Originally Posted by Cyclonepride 
No, it's one thing when they ask us to believe empirical and anecdotal evidence that's extrapolated into a story, and quite another when we are asked to change our way of life for it. There are so many compelling reasons to save the environment, so why is it thought necessary to create doomsday scenarios to get action? Other than because carbon credits= big business and big money?
I'm confused ... isn't this exactly what the global warming/climate change proponents/scientists are doing?
