Originally Posted by CloneAggie 
So if the first thing the creator did was to create someone to document his creation. Would we then believe in creation? Is that what you're asking?
Good question. My own question lacked some clarity.
I'm not exactly asking if it would be mandatory that the creator's first work would be to create someone to document the creation. As I'm thinking about that idea, it would be difficult for that someone to survive without a place to survive in. Didn't mean to make that sound so odd.
I'm more pointing to the Bible as a work 'whose' writing was guided by that creator. If that creator, who would be an eyewitness, left such a record, which recounted in an observable manner the act of creation, would that kind of sound like it meets the criteria that something must be observable? In a sense, scientific?
Did that make it clearer, or just use a lot more words? (I wish Icould be paid by the word? Man, that would be awesome!!!!)
