CycloneFanatic

Go Back   CycloneFanatic
Register Mark Forums Read

Notices

Please help support CF, Donate Today!

» Site Navigation
Home
08-09 Football
08-09 MBB
08-09 WBB
08-09 Wrestling
Site Rules
Photo Gallery
Social Groups
CyBookie
CF Top Stats

Donate!
CF Store

Forum Index
» Forum Menu
Forum Index
Front-Page News
Site News
Feedback/Support
Introductions
CF Tourney Pools
Betting Board
Press Releases
ISU General
Campus Life
ISU MBB
ISU WBB
ISU Football
ISU Wrestling
Big XII
In-State Rivals
General College
Pro Sports
Off Topic
Politics/Religion
Gaming & Groups
Ticket Exchange
CF Archive
Restricted Forums
Advertise Here


Thread: NCAA or NFL
View Single Post
Old 08-26-2008, 06:50 PM   #27
jumbopackage
Pro
 
jumbopackage's Avatar
 
Re: NCAA or NFL

Originally Posted by CloneAggie View Post
I think this statement is debatable considering a team with two losses played in the national championship game last year.

Other things I don't like about Div. I college FB:
1) No playoff system;
2) Losing early in the season is generally more favorable than losing late in the season (if you have championship aspirations); and
3) Lack of consistency in how conferences handle certain things, namely whether or not they have a championship game.
It's debatable, but if there had been two undefeated teams, they would both have been playing. (let's not get into it about Hawaii...we saw what they were) I would agree that the more parity there is, the less the "every game matters" thing applies, but I think it's largely true looking back at the past 20 years or so of CFB.

1 - I don't think it matters, honestly. No matter what you did, you couldn't make it an even playing field for everyone unless you're willing to drastically change the structure of the conferences, and that means that any playoff would produce just as illegitimate a champion as the current system.

2 - I would agree somewhat, but the BCS has largely mitigated that. Nebraska losing to K-state in the Big 12 Championship, LSU losing late last year. Georgia lost earlier than LSU, but didn't get invited to the big game. Losing at all is a bad bad thing in NCAA D-1 football is you want to be a contender.

3 - I think that's somewhat part of the fun with it. You can blame the conferences for it, though. It's a ton of money to turn down every year.


What I would like to see, especially in the event of 3 or more undefeated teams, is the bowl season play out, and then the rankings AFTER those games determining a +1 game. Sort of like a playoff, but more like a second BCS championship game. I think that would largely of solved most of the "split national championship" questions over the history of College football. Last year, for instance, had Hawaii beat Georgia, they would have gotten a shot at, say, LSU. Or, as it played out, Georgia would have had a shot against LSU.

You mean we have unlimited juice?
This party is going to be off....THE HOOK!
jumbopackage is offline   Reply With Quote
 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.


vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
All content owned by CycloneFanatic.com and Jeremy Lind - All rights reserved 2005-08. By viewing this website you agree to the Terms of Service, Site Rules and Legal Disclaimer. The words, views, images and opinions expressed or provided by users do not reflect the opinions or views of CycloneFanatic.com, Jeremy Lind or Iowa State University. The names, words, symbols, and graphics representing Iowa State University are trademarks and copyrights of the University protected by the trademark and copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries and are used on this web site under license from the University.