Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jsmith86
That is what Ohio State let the Hawkeyes tell you.
Grate Post Buddy Grate Post....:twitcy:
Scarcasm Costs Little and Amuses Many...:twitcy:
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
I am not sure how much this revenue sharing changes things with all the football games on TV now, but if it helps a little we will take it!!
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
i think ive finally decided who i will be cheering for in the iowa-NU game from now on
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hawkeyeh8r
i think ive finally decided who i will be cheering for in the iowa-NU game from now on
The refs? That what I decided to do a long time ago. I a guess I thought it was a no brainer.
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
sorry boys it took 4 yeah count em FOUR teams in the old big 12 to vote against equal revenue sharing, not one but again FOUR!
this is common sense.
you are right we were against equal revenue sharing in the big 12 but its quite clear that we werent the only ones the, its just that now the big boys are being outvoted by the little guys because they are hanging by their nuts!
i mean seriously step back and remember the FACTS about what went down a year ago and it becomes quite clear that danny beebe is just trying to save face. seems to me like a commissioner that is trying to convey a mirage of self worth and conformity.
psychologically speaking, the person taking the pot shots is generally the person to blame.
p.s. wait til texas gets that network going and you can watch them climb that mountain even further ahead of ya. :twitcy:
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cykadelic2
And those suggesting that Tom Osborne was the primary source of blame for the prior lack of conference unity are absolutely dead on.
Yup. HUGE mistake by NU to bring Tom back as AD. Now, not than anybody cares, but the question arises as to how long will it take him to disrupt the Big Ten...
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
Quote:
Originally Posted by
huskerman
sorry boys it took 4 yeah count em FOUR teams in the old big 12 to vote against equal revenue sharing, not one but again FOUR!
this is common sense.
you are right we were against equal revenue sharing in the big 12 but its quite clear that we werent the only ones the, its just that now the big boys are being outvoted by the little guys because they are hanging by their nuts!
i mean seriously step back and remember the FACTS about what went down a year ago and it becomes quite clear that danny beebe is just trying to save face. seems to me like a commissioner that is trying to convey a mirage of self worth and conformity.
psychologically speaking, the person taking the pot shots is generally the person to blame.
p.s. wait til texas gets that network going and you can watch them climb that mountain even further ahead of ya. :twitcy:
The response to this idiot should be hilarious.
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
Quote:
Originally Posted by
huskerman
sorry boys it took 4 yeah count em FOUR teams in the old big 12 to vote against equal revenue sharing, not one but again FOUR!
this is common sense.
you are right we were against equal revenue sharing in the big 12 but its quite clear that we werent the only ones the, its just that now the big boys are being outvoted by the little guys because they are hanging by their nuts!
i mean seriously step back and remember the FACTS about what went down a year ago and it becomes quite clear that danny beebe is just trying to save face. seems to me like a commissioner that is trying to convey a mirage of self worth and conformity.
psychologically speaking, the person taking the pot shots is generally the person to blame.
p.s. wait til texas gets that network going and you can watch them climb that mountain even further ahead of ya. :twitcy:
First of all, that sig pic might be the dumbest, most corny thing I have seen.
You guys left. If it was Texas who was all hot and bothered don't you think they would have left or gone independent? Do you honestly think you guys were the first choice of Big 12 teams to poach? You weren't. Texas was. Texas decided to stay and the Big Ten defaulted to you. Then you dropped out of the AAC which I think is just hilarious. It won't ever matter, but it's just how it looks that's funny.
While you were here, you stalled equal sharing talks every chance you get. Am I supposed to think it's just a coincidence that, in their first opportunity, the conference has expanded equal sharing?
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
Quote:
Originally Posted by
huskerman
sorry boys it took 4 yeah count em FOUR teams in the old big 12 to vote against equal revenue sharing, not one but again FOUR!
Right, and your ******* program was vote number 4. Then you would cry when the other schools you screwed over wouldn't vote with you
Quote:
Originally Posted by
huskerman
i mean seriously step back and remember the FACTS about what went down a year ago and it becomes quite clear that danny beebe is just trying to save face. seems to me like a commissioner that is trying to convey a mirage of self worth and conformity.
psychologically speaking, the person taking the pot shots is generally the person to blame.
Husker fans don't know the facts about what happened a year ago. You only listen to what Osborne and Harvey tell you. Interesting that Harvey was sent home with his tail between his legs on more than one occassion from the Big 12.
Go play with your ********* graphics and skanks in Knebby wear on another message board.
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LindenCy
I'd rep you, but I have to "spread the wealth around."
Socialist scumbag.:smile:
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
I've seen several different acronymns used in the posts above and I think they were trying to refer to the Association of American Universities (AAU). After like 111 years Nebraska was the first school voted out. And they are not trying to cut numbers as they just invited Georgia Tech to join.
U. of Nebraska-Lincoln Is Voted Out of Assn. of American Universities - Government - The Chronicle of Higher Education
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%
Quote:
Originally Posted by
yaman3
First of all, that sig pic might be the dumbest, most corny thing I have seen.
You guys left. If it was Texas who was all hot and bothered don't you think they would have left or gone independent? Do you honestly think you guys were the first choice of Big 12 teams to poach? You weren't. Texas was. Texas decided to stay and the Big Ten defaulted to you. Then you dropped out of the AAC which I think is just hilarious. It won't ever matter, but it's just how it looks that's funny.
While you were here, you stalled equal sharing talks every chance you get. Am I supposed to think it's just a coincidence that, in their first opportunity, the conference has expanded equal sharing?
Don't you use "you guys" with this troll when talking about the AAU. There's no way in hell this guy actually went to kNU.
Re: Big 12 Revenue Sharing at 76%