Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 63

Thread: Pitt to the ACC

  1. #46
    All-Star
    Points: 24,049, Level: 47
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 501
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,809
    Points
    24,049
    Level
    47

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    Quote Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
    I'd be fine with Louisville, USF & UCF as 3 additions.. I don't know if that'll entice Boren to stay though
    Ahhh...I see Stoops' plan in all this. Use Cali recruiting as a decoy and go for Florida instead. Well played Boomer, well played...

  2. #47
    Speechless
    Points: 376,337, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    alarson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    18,713
    Points
    376,337
    Level
    100

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    Quote Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
    I'd be fine with Louisville, USF & UCF as 3 additions.. I don't know if that'll entice Boren to stay though
    USF is a good one i forgot in my above post. They'd be a good grab.

    There are definitely quality teams, and honestly at this point OU cannot anymore say that it was impossible to find adequate replacements for TAMU. Between BYU and big east options, this all falls on OU now if this blows up, no excuses from OU about how there were no other options.

  3. #48
    Addict
    Points: 105,961, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    aeroclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,069
    Points
    105,961
    Level
    100

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    Okay, consider me confused. I thought this OU to the Pac thing was all leverage against UT to share revenue, and that OU was our best friends and we were joined at the hip. Now it is looking like the whole thing is going to blow up and we are going to end up in a Big East conference that will be even weaker than it already is? Awesome.

  4. #49
    Pro
    Points: 25,777, Level: 49
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 773
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Jarrods79's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Washington D.C.
    Posts
    2,080
    Points
    25,777
    Level
    49

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    I'm not freaking out about this for a few reasons:
    1. The Big12, Big East, and ACC met in August to discuss these factors. One would have to assume the cards were all shown in that meeting and the situation is playing out like one of the scenarios anticipated (not saying if that scenario is good or bad for ISU...that is unknown).
    2. Pitt and Syracuse are good fits for the ACC. I'm especially interested to see that they are taking the best "geographic" option for their school.
    3. These schools were potential B1G targets...so now they are off the table.
    4. It isn't the Big 12 that is moving right now. Stability is important for our conference members, and there are plenty of stability and expansion options still out there.

  5. #50
    Speechless
    Points: 376,337, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    alarson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    18,713
    Points
    376,337
    Level
    100

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarrods79 View Post
    4. It isn't the Big 12 that is moving right now. Stability is important for our conference members, and there are plenty of stability and expansion options still out there.

    This is important to note. No way can OU claim it had to leave because of b12 stability or because we couldnt find replacement teams. If reports are correct, the ACC has locked in its members with higher departure fees. The SEC already has A&M and just needs one more, which it can get with taking WVU from the BE. The rest of the big east will be ripe for cherry picking to get back to 12 (we can be back to 12 taking only existing AQ teams). The big 10 wont jump higher unless it feels it absolutely has to (it doesnt). The PAC cant really expand unless the b12 teams decide to blow it up.

  6. #51
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 91,995, Level: 94
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 1,155
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    3,892
    Points
    91,995
    Level
    94

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    Heartland Conference

    Southwest Division
    Texas TCU Texas Tech Houston Baylor Louisville UCF South Florida Midwest Division BYU UNLV Hawaii Cincinnati Iowa State Air Force Kansas Kansas State


    Some nice travel destinations and a few pretty strong programs in that mix....if, of course, Texas decides to stick with us and rebuild the Big 12 remnants. Trips to Hawaii, Vegas and Florida most years...works for me. Would rather sneak into the Big Ten...but trying to be realistic.
    Last edited by Mesaclone1; 09-17-2011 at 10:24 AM.

  7. #52
    Addict
    Points: 99,029, Level: 97
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 21
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Tornado man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    6,908
    Points
    99,029
    Level
    97

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    Quote Originally Posted by alarson View Post
    USF is a good one i forgot in my above post. They'd be a good grab.

    There are definitely quality teams, and honestly at this point OU cannot anymore say that it was impossible to find adequate replacements for TAMU. Between BYU and big east options, this all falls on OU now if this blows up, no excuses from OU about how there were no other options.
    I don't agree that those teams are "adequate replacements" for A&M, and I doubt OU thinks so either...

  8. #53
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 102,953, Level: 99
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 97
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    CyFan61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,346
    Points
    102,953
    Level
    99

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    SIAP, but OU and UT Regents are both meeting on Monday?

    That could be a huge day for all of this.

  9. #54
    Speechless
    Points: 522,393, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    ISUAgronomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Back in Iowa!!!!!!!!
    Posts
    20,082
    Points
    522,393
    Level
    100

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    Quote Originally Posted by CyFan61 View Post
    SIAP, but OU and UT Regents are both meeting on Monday?

    That could be a huge day for all of this.
    Yep. The Iowa BOR meets on the 20th (Tuesday) and the State of Kansas BOR meets on the 21st and 22nd (Wednesday-Thursday) - Both regularly scheduled but agenda updates could happen.
    Last edited by ISUAgronomist; 09-17-2011 at 11:00 AM.


  10. #55
    Recruit
    Points: 3,421, Level: 16
    Level completed: 93%, Points required for next Level: 29
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    81
    Points
    3,421
    Level
    16

    Pitt to the ACC

    I share this sentiment. The more schools and states that are involved in this crap, the more likely it is that someone steps in and tells them to pull their heads out of their *****.

    Just my thought though....I could be totally wrong.


    ---
    - Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #56
    Speechless
    Points: 182,476, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 48.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    22,844
    Points
    182,476
    Level
    100

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    Quote Originally Posted by Mesaclone1 View Post
    Heartland Conference

    Southwest Division
    Texas TCU Texas Tech Houston Baylor Louisville UCF South Florida Midwest Division BYU UNLV Hawaii Cincinnati Iowa State Air Force Kansas Kansas State


    Some nice travel destinations and a few pretty strong programs in that mix....if, of course, Texas decides to stick with us and rebuild the Big 12 remnants. Trips to Hawaii, Vegas and Florida most years...works for me. Would rather sneak into the Big Ten...but trying to be realistic.
    No thanks. That is a logistics nightmare. We have better options IMO.

  12. #57
    Speechless
    Points: 182,476, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 48.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    22,844
    Points
    182,476
    Level
    100

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    Quote Originally Posted by Tornado man View Post
    I don't agree that those teams are "adequate replacements" for A&M, and I doubt OU thinks so either...
    Based on what?? A&M has a big stadium and big fan base. But they are not the program they were when they first joined the Big XII. A&M has won only 1 Bowl game in umpteen years. They are not the football power you seem to think they are. They will become even more irrelevant in the SEC.

  13. #58
    Speechless
    Points: 174,618, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hurdleisu24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    16,111
    Points
    174,618
    Level
    100

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    I think the SEC would take USF if were talking big east teams

  14. #59
    Speechless
    Points: 234,389, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    isuno1fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Clive, Iowa
    Posts
    15,957
    Points
    234,389
    Level
    100

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    USF sucks...I don't want a team that is mediocre at FB and sucks at everything else that is geographically out of whack. Terrible choice.

  15. #60
    Speechless
    Points: 322,460, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    46,650
    Points
    322,460
    Level
    100

    Re: Pitt to the ACC

    Quote Originally Posted by CyFan61 View Post
    This is actually not that bad.

    OU & OSU to Pac
    Pitt and 'Cuse to ACC
    TAMU and Mizzou to SEC
    UT and ND to B1G?
    Leaving KU/KSU/ISU/BU and a few others (ECU? UCF? Houston?) to Big East

    Where you had 6 BCS conferences of varying size before, you'd now have 5 each with 14 teams.
    Now the espn lead says Baylor and ISU to BE just in case.
    Last edited by Wesley; 09-17-2011 at 01:57 PM.
    Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19