-
Big XII contingency plan
I hate to start a new thread but I wanted to start a new spin-off of the discussion.
It appears that UT/TTU/OU/OSU are headed West.
This leaves: ISU/KSU/KU/MU/Baylor as the 5 final pieces of the Big 12.
Here are a few key scenarios I would like to see play out:
1A. Massive Exit penalties, the 5 remain together
1. Big 12 offices move to KC
2. In this scenario, I would prefer to retain our Texas foothold and grab some combo of TCU/SMU/and Houston.
3. After securing a Texas presence, attempt to lure a combo of Louisville, Cincy, Air Force, & BYU.
4. Retain AQ status and create a much more manageable league and an opportunity for ISU to become very competitive.
-
Re: Big XII contingency plan
NO SMU
Also pull in UCF and USF for Florida recruiting.
-
Re: Big XII contingency plan
 Originally Posted by delt4cy I hate to start a new thread but I wanted to start a new spin-off of the discussion.
It appears that UT/TTU/OU/OSU are headed West.
This leaves: ISU/KSU/KU/MU/Baylor as the 5 final pieces of the Big 12.
Here are a few key scenarios I would like to see play out:
1A. Massive Exit penalties, the 5 remain together
1. Big 12 offices move to KC
2. In this scenario, I would prefer to retain our Texas foothold and grab some combo of TCU/SMU/and Houston.
3. After securing a Texas presence, attempt to lure a combo of Louisville, Cincy, Air Force, & BYU.
4. Retain AQ status and create a much more manageable league and an opportunity for ISU to become very competitive. Not to be a negative nancy, BUT
once the superconferences are established, NO AQ status will be available outside of those 4 conferences. Also why attempt to bring these other schools up to AQ status why ISU is fighting for 1 of the 4 spots in the B1G??? Need to reduce competition, not increase it.
-
Re: Big XII contingency plan
 Originally Posted by HoopsTournament NO SMU
Also pull in UCF and USF for Florida recruiting. This!
I like this arrangement personally
WEST:
ISU
MU
KU
KSU
BYU
Baylor
EAST:
USF
Louie
Cinci
rutgers
TCU
Houston
Or North South again but that wouldn't benefit us too much.
North:
MU
ISU
KU
KSU
BYU
Rutgers
South:
Loui
Cinci
TCU
Houston
Baylor
USF
  Originally Posted by AltHawk Why would it? One bad game doesn't change a thing. Iowa will still be a darkhorse B1G championship contender, and Iowa State will be lucky to make the NIT. -
Re: Big XII contingency plan
West. * * * * * * * * * * * * East
Boise State * * * * * * *Iowa State
BYU. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mizzou
Baylor. * * * * * * * * * * * ND
TCU * * * * * * * * * * * * * * USF
SMU. * * * * * * * * * * * * * WV
Houston. * * * * * * * * * * Cincy
Kansas. * * * * * * * * * * *Louisville
Kansas St. * * * * * * * * *Rutgers
Wildcards (incase some teams don't agree)
Air Force
New Mexico
Villinova (would be a BIG jump)
Northern Illinois*
UCF/FIU
Iowa State: Anyone who's a true college basketball fan needs to see a game at Hilton Coliseum. Nice is in the DNA of Iowans and the fans here are particularly gracious -- even when the home team loses but gives a great effort, they are appreciative. ESPN.com picked Hilton Coliseum as the "Hot Arena" in the Big 12...coaches in the league noted that, "regardless of talent, the Cyclones have a home court like no other." -
Re: Big XII contingency plan
 Originally Posted by erikbj Not to be a negative nancy, BUT
once the superconferences are established, NO AQ status will be available outside of those 4 conferences. Also why attempt to bring these other schools up to AQ status why ISU is fighting for 1 of the 4 spots in the B1G??? Need to reduce competition, not increase it. But this is just media propoganda. Not to mention, who says the Big 10 is expanding, they may sit tight at 12 too, which would leave SEC at 14 and ACC at either 14 or 16.
  Originally Posted by AltHawk Why would it? One bad game doesn't change a thing. Iowa will still be a darkhorse B1G championship contender, and Iowa State will be lucky to make the NIT. -
Re: Big XII contingency plan
 Originally Posted by cmoore_23 West. * * * * * * * * * * * * East
Boise State * * * * * * *Iowa State
BYU. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mizzou
Baylor. * * * * * * * * * * * ND
TCU * * * * * * * * * * * * * * USF
SMU. * * * * * * * * * * * * * WV
Houston. * * * * * * * * * * Cincy
Kansas. * * * * * * * * * * *Louisville
Kansas St. * * * * * * * * *Rutgers
Wildcards (incase some teams don't agree)
Air Force
New Mexico
Villinova (would be a BIG jump)
Northern Illinois*
UCF/FIU It is sad, but we may need Boise for football respect...
  Originally Posted by AltHawk Why would it? One bad game doesn't change a thing. Iowa will still be a darkhorse B1G championship contender, and Iowa State will be lucky to make the NIT. -
Re: Big XII contingency plan
 Originally Posted by erikbj Not to be a negative nancy, BUT
once the superconferences are established, NO AQ status will be available outside of those 4 conferences. Also why attempt to bring these other schools up to AQ status why ISU is fighting for 1 of the 4 spots in the B1G??? Need to reduce competition, not increase it. Who says there will be no AQ conferences outside of those four? If remnants of Big 12 and Big East combine under one of those conference names it would be pretty hard to take away their AQ status...
-
Re: Big XII contingency plan
Did we really need another thread for your "contingency plan"? There are countless pages on this stuff already.
-
Re: Big XII contingency plan
Why can't the Big 12 stay together now and just add those teams? Why are OU, Okie St, TT, and Texas so hell bent on leaving now? What's wrong with this conference:
North:
Iowa State, MU, Kansas, K-State, Louisville, WVU
South:
Texas, TT, Baylor, OU, Okie State, BYU
If we need two additional teams, Notre Dame is an obvious one if they'll want a conference for the North and TCU for the south. If not ND, take Cincy.
-
Re: Big XII contingency plan
ND is not coming to the big 12. The only way we go to the big 10 is if Iowa and Nebraska rally the rest of the big 10 to ask us to come. So basically If Nebby and Iowa don't rally for us we are screwed there.
Also the Big 12 has been so far has not even attempted to reach out to any other teams. Basically they have sat and watched other conferances pick off our teams.
Nobody but HB knows for sure. You pretty much know nothing....like Knownothing would like to say.
Word -
Re: Big XII contingency plan
 Originally Posted by SvrWxCy Who says there will be no AQ conferences outside of those four? If remnants of Big 12 and Big East combine under one of those conference names it would be pretty hard to take away their AQ status... 8 BCS spots (or whatever replaces the BCS). 4 conferences (8 Leagues), each League champion gets a AQ spot. They are not going to give a AQ spot to the left overs.
-
Re: Big XII contingency plan
I think Missouri and WV are out long term as either Big Ten or SEC. I also think either ISU or Kansas, and possibly KSU is out long term as Big Ten but I'll include those 3 for now.
There needs to be a focus on getting some good football, geography be damned.
West:
Boise State
TCU
BYU
AFA
Houston
KSU
KU
East:
ISU
Louisville
East Carolina
South Florida
UCF
Cincy
Memphis
Or
North:
ISU
KU
KSU
Boise State
AFA
BYU
South:
TCU
Houston
UCF
South Florida
Cincy
Memphis
East Carolina
Big East catholic schools go to their own hoops league, they're loosing 3 marquee programs and Rutgers anyway.
Those are your 13 best with Big 12/Big East leftovers, and ISU, KU, KSU, South Florida, Louisville, and Cincy could still all find a better home possibly.
Last edited by HFCS; 09-19-2011 at 09:14 AM.
-
Re: Big XII contingency plan
 Originally Posted by erikbj 8 BCS spots (or whatever replaces the BCS). 4 conferences (8 Leagues), each League champion gets a AQ spot. They are not going to give a AQ spot to the left overs. If they have 8 team playoff, with 4 conference champs, they'd be smart to not only have the 4 at large bids, but guarantee one to a team outside the super 4 NFL leagues.
If they don't they'll be forced to do something like it in the lawsuit they lose.
-
Re: Big XII contingency plan
[QUOTE=Clonegrad07;2407530]Why are OU, Okie St, TT, and Texas so hell bent on leaving now? What's wrong with this conference?
This is THE question that both puzzles and grieves me. In the minds of NU and aTm, UT was the bad guy, the reason for leaving. (Not sure about CU, but they always wanted to be with their cultural peers on the west coast.) But now, it appears as though TX is not so bad: three other conference schools are leaving with UT. If nobody likes UT, why join a different conference where UT will also be? Everyone says it's about the money, but the new Big XII TV package looked pretty darn good. I don't understand any of this.
I bleed Cardinal & Gold 
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks