356Likes -
11-28-2012, 08:48 AM #826
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by UNIGuy4Cy Lets not be dumb here, this was a direct shot by the ACC at the Big 12. Louisville to*join ACC, replacing Maryland as league's 14th member - Pete Thamel - SI.com
From Pete Thamel at SI.com:
A source with knowledge of the ACC's discussions said a big reason that the ACC moved so quickly to add Louisville was that the Big 12 also had interest in the Cardinals.
Louisville was always considered a logical candidate for the Big 12, as it would give West Virginia a geographic partner. The looming question is whether Big 12 presidents feel pressure to expand from 10 schools now that the Pac-12 (12), SEC (14), ACC (14), and Big Ten (14) are all significantly bigger.
-
11-28-2012, 08:49 AM #827
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by Al_4_State Exactly. Can't these people read that Louisville is not bringing any money to the ACC? If they aren't making the ACC money, they sure as hell aren't going to make the Big 12 money.
This is the ACC's version of us adding TCU. Like I said, the ACC failed big time by not adding U Conn.
-
11-28-2012, 08:54 AM #828
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
Some quotes from the ESPN article: The ACC also considered UConn and Cincinnati for membership. However, sources told ESPN the league only wanted Louisville because there is a sense among league presidents that the ACC can add more schools at a later date if the ACC lost any other schools The addition of Louisville will not affect the ACC's new media rights deal. When the ACC added Notre Dame in all sports but football in September, sources told ESPN the ACC's media rights deal was expected to increase to about $18 million annually. It should be abundantly obvious why the Big 12 is not adding Louisville.
In 1984, I was hospitalized for approaching perfection. -
11-28-2012, 08:56 AM #829
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by ISUAgronomist "We have to have "x" games in Texas every year to pull in Texas recruits"
What are we selling the great Florida kids each year that we pull in... Culture of the states is completely different. Kids raised in Texas are taught that Texas is the greatest state in the nation, and that nothing else can compete with it. It is unlike any other state in that regard. The hubris makes recruiting Texas very hard if you are not going to give them a chance to play in the "mother land". Florida and most other states will have kids that aren't taught to hate all other locales, and will be much more open to pulling up their stakes.
Last edited by brett108; 11-28-2012 at 09:02 AM.
-
11-28-2012, 08:58 AM #830
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by CarrollCyclone A source with knowledge of the ACC's discussions said a big reason that the ACC moved so quickly to add Louisville was that the Big 12 also had interest in the Cardinals.
Who's the "source"? TheDudeofWV???
Also found this interesting from the ESPN article... However, sources told ESPN the league only wanted Louisville because there is a sense among league presidents that the ACC can add more schools at a later date if the ACC lost any other schools. -
11-28-2012, 08:58 AM #831
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by ISUAgronomist "We have to have "x" games in Texas every year to pull in Texas recruits"
What are we selling the great Florida kids each year that we pull in... I'm all for the Big 12 getting Miami and Florida State. My dream scenario would be to add Clemson, Virginia Tech, Miami, Florida State, UConn and Notre Dame.
Last edited by chuckd4735; 11-28-2012 at 09:02 AM.
-
11-28-2012, 09:00 AM #832
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by brett108 Culture of the states is completely different. Kids raised in Texas are taught that Texas is the greatest state in the nation, and that nothing else can compete with it. It is unlike any other state in the nation in that regard. The hubris makes recruiting Texas very hard if you are not going to give them a chance to play in the "mother land". Florida and most other states will have kids that aren't taught to hate all other locales, and will be much more open to pulling up their stakes. It's so sad those kids are lead to believe such rubbish.
∞ -
11-28-2012, 09:00 AM #833
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by FarminCy I personally would have rather had Louisville than TCU. Yeah, we screwed that up at the time. TCU was readily available, so we got them to plug the Hole that A&M left. We couldn't drop below 10 because it would nullify the TV contracts, and the conference may have fallen apart. So then when Mizzou left it took so long for all that to unfold because we had to get all our ducks in a row with WV, and they had to sue the Big East to get out immediately.
If we would have known Mizzou was gonna follow A&M, maybe we go after a tandem like WV and Louisville, but Mizzou was telling us they were committed, so we grabbed TCU since they were kind of in Limbo, and could get out of the Big East fairly easily.
-
11-28-2012, 09:01 AM #834
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by chuckd4735 I'm all for the Big 12 getting Miami and Florida State. This... Miami (barring bad sanctions) is on the verge of becoming a relevant team again, and combined with FSU the BigXII would have the entire Florida market minus Gainesville
Self proclaimed 2012 CF Newcomer of the Year -
11-28-2012, 09:02 AM #835
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by BloodyBuddy Yeah, we screwed that up at the time. TCU was readily available, so we got them to plug the Hole that A&M left. We couldn't drop below 10 because it would nullify the TV contracts, and the conference may have fallen apart. So then when Mizzou left it took so long for all that to unfold because we had to get all our ducks in a row with WV, and they had to sue the Big East to get out immediately.
If we would have known Mizzou was gonna follow A&M, maybe we go after a tandem like WV and Louisville, but Mizzou was telling us they were committed, so we grabbed TCU since they were kind of in Limbo, and could get out of the Big East fairly easily. Exactly. Louisville is probably a little better add than TCU, but we did what we had to do to keep our TV contracts alive, and in the end healthy.
In 1984, I was hospitalized for approaching perfection. -
11-28-2012, 09:11 AM #836
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
Joe Schad @schadjoe ACC Presidents have agreement to disclose any contact from other conferences and source says it hasn't happened outside of Maryland But ALL our sources....
Signed,
WVU bloggers
∞ -
11-28-2012, 09:15 AM #837
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by ISUAgronomist Joe Schad @schadjoe ACC Presidents have agreement to disclose any contact from other conferences and source says it hasn't happened outside of Maryland ACC Presidents must disclose any contact from other conferences.*
*Disclosure must take place within 2 years after joining the conference that contacted you. -
11-28-2012, 09:17 AM #838
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by ISUAgronomist TCU brings a media market we already own. ALL OF TEXAS. There was no market gain adding them. Find a city in Texas where you can't watch a Big 12 football game... Signed the LHN,
Iowa State @ Texas 2012
-
11-28-2012, 09:17 AM #839
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by DistrictCyclone ACC Presidents must disclose any contact from other conferences.*
*Disclosure must take place within 2 years after joining the conference that contacted you. lol. good catch.
-
11-28-2012, 09:18 AM #840
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by AllBig12Drinker Signed the LHN,
Iowa State @ Texas 2012 LHN is a myth along with everything being bigger and basketball fans in Texas.
∞
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks