353Likes -
12-04-2012, 04:31 PM #1351
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by Cyclophile1 Depends on what the FOX execs think, but, by and large I think you are correct. FOX is paying the money for big matchups and that means FSU (and to a lesser extent Clemson) playing the other heavyweights. The inventory overall would be increasing by three games total and they are getting a bunch of higher profile matchups. As well as some flexibility in scheduling an occasional heavyweight out of conference. What it likely means is that ISU-Kansas, ISU-Baylor, and Baylor-Kansas and those kinds of games probably won't make the Tier 2 slate as often. If the money is going up to $30 million per team, is that something we can live with? I don't think there are enough quality time slots to support 54 conference games (12 team with 9 games each) much less 63 time slots needed for 14 teams at 9 games each. Imagine 16 teams with 9 conference games - an inventory of 72 games? I'm guessing that we would see a lot more conference games played in Week2, with the cupcakes coming in late in the year like the SEC has done just to make sure we have enough time slots available for the Big Dogs. I'm thinking that 16 team with a 9-game schedule would make for a huge electronic and media presence. If it happens, we need to be prepared for ISU to have a number of games not aired on T1/T2 each season, probably 2 or even 3.
Issues like this are why I just really like the 12-team model. If all of it leads to a playoff with greater than 4 teams in the future, I think we may all look back at this mess from 2010 forward as a shameful, unnecessary money and power grab. With a seeded 8-team model, you could have a viable BigEast and ACC along with the Big Four conferences and a couple of wild cards and have everything work out fine most years. Exactly. You just need two or three good games per week to fill up the big money spots. After that, does it really matter if KU is playing Baylor that week as opposed to KU playing Rice?
-
12-04-2012, 04:32 PM #1352
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by Wesley So is anybody tracking those FSU/Clemson planes to Dallas? This is where we miss Cyber:(
"Really Jail wouldn't be so bad (If he had CF)..I'd wake up-check Cyclone Fanatic and not have to go to work, so there's a plus" -MEClone -
12-04-2012, 05:21 PM #1353
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
FSU to Big 12 is a done deal...according to radio stations in Tampa. Hope this is true.. Florida State: Seminoles to Join the Big 12 -
12-04-2012, 05:28 PM #1354
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style. -
12-04-2012, 05:31 PM #1355
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
These links and tweets are all the same article. Fwiw.
-
12-04-2012, 05:35 PM #1356
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
It's circular reports...I'll wait for someone of substance to report it.
-
12-04-2012, 05:36 PM #1357
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by isuno1fan It's circular reports...I'll wait for someone of substance to report it. Obviously. Not getting hopes up but worth posting regardless.
-
12-04-2012, 05:39 PM #1358
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
Believe it when a credible source says so
-
12-04-2012, 05:41 PM #1359
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by Boxerdaddy  Originally Posted by dahliaclone Obviously. Not getting hopes up but worth posting regardless. Yes...keep posting....muhahahahhahahah
-
12-04-2012, 05:55 PM #1360
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
Last edited by Wesley; 12-04-2012 at 05:57 PM.
Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style. -
12-04-2012, 06:07 PM #1361
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by Cyclophile1 Depends on what the FOX execs think, but, by and large I think you are correct. FOX is paying the money for big matchups and that means FSU (and to a lesser extent Clemson) playing the other heavyweights. The inventory overall would be increasing by three games total and they are getting a bunch of higher profile matchups. As well as some flexibility in scheduling an occasional heavyweight out of conference. What it likely means is that ISU-Kansas, ISU-Baylor, and Baylor-Kansas and those kinds of games probably won't make the Tier 2 slate as often. If the money is going up to $30 million per team, is that something we can live with? I don't think there are enough quality time slots to support 54 conference games (12 team with 9 games each) much less 63 time slots needed for 14 teams at 9 games each. Imagine 16 teams with 9 conference games - an inventory of 72 games? I'm guessing that we would see a lot more conference games played in Week2, with the cupcakes coming in late in the year like the SEC has done just to make sure we have enough time slots available for the Big Dogs. I'm thinking that 16 team with a 9-game schedule would make for a huge electronic and media presence. If it happens, we need to be prepared for ISU to have a number of games not aired on T1/T2 each season, probably 2 or even 3.
Issues like this are why I just really like the 12-team model. If all of it leads to a playoff with greater than 4 teams in the future, I think we may all look back at this mess from 2010 forward as a shameful, unnecessary money and power grab. With a seeded 8-team model, you could have a viable BigEast and ACC along with the Big Four conferences and a couple of wild cards and have everything work out fine most years. Fox is adding new channel on August. They will have 5 networks for games. They want content to fill those networks.
-
12-04-2012, 06:11 PM #1362
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
With the 2014 playoff system next year, conferences are now making their moves. I still think BIG, SEC, and B12 want to sllicee up the ACC and BE to make them impotent. Even Dodds can see that. ND may be back in play.
Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style. -
12-04-2012, 06:13 PM #1363
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
FWIW, this rumor (at this point) seems to be starting much like MD to the Big 10 did: via radio stations in cities within the inviting conference.
In 1984, I was hospitalized for approaching perfection. -
12-04-2012, 06:55 PM #1364
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
1) Florida State would be a huge get for this conference. The dominoes will fall at that point.
2) I am seeing one blogger from rant sports or something and a few radio people discuss this. I will believe this when legit sources start reporting it.
3) ISU will be fine in all of this
4) Expansion sucks. I heard KU was thinking about the B1G earlier and I hope that is not true. KU and ISU (as well as KSU) have so much history that it would be sad to see that go.
"Die rebel scum" - Paul Rhoads -
12-04-2012, 07:00 PM #1365
Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***
 Originally Posted by HoopsTournament Fox is adding new channel on August. They will have 5 networks for games. They want content to fill those networks. There also is a rumor, which could be what you are talking about, that they are going to change Speed to a 24/7 national sports channel.
The gap in our economy is between what we have and what we think we ought to have--and that is a moral problem, not an economic one. - Paul Heyne
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks