ISU MUST package themselves with KU, KSU, and MU

[isuno1fan]

KU WILL NOT go to the MWC IMO. Only chance to hold onto KU is BE or rebuilding the BXII.

Everyone that thinks the BE is going to get raided even if the 4 BXII teams went there should consider the MWC losing Utah to the P10 and possibly MO & KU to either the B10 or SEC. What looks like a decent MWC shaping up could go to crap real fast just like the BE.

Bottom line...our position and choices suck.

[Cyclone90]

What really sucks is the 10 current non-BCS MWC schools could suddenly be granted BCS status after they expand while we're left out in the cold (C-USA or worse). You'd think the NCAA would have some say in the matter that current BCS schools couldn't be downgraded in this whole process.

[rhillary]

What really sucks is the 10 current non-BCS MWC schools could suddenly be granted BCS status after they expand while we're left out in the cold (C-USA or worse). You'd think the NCAA would have some say in the matter that current BCS schools couldn't be downgraded in this whole process.

Once again, the NCAA does not give a **** about ISU. They care about MONEY and they will be getting more of it after all is said and done. I am betting the only schools that end up going from "Non-BCS" to "BCS" status are ISU and Baylor.

You think the NCAA is going to make rule changes to help ISU or Baylor?

They are more likely to make rules changes that hurt us!

[helechopper]

The MWC would take ISU in a heart beat. Stop over reacting please.

[cyfanatic]

The MWC would tIe ISU in a heart beat. Stop over reacting please.

How do you know this?

[CYVADER]

How do you know this?

because they already have wyoming. are you going to try and tell me that wyoming is a more viable entity than iowa state? please do i would love to hear your argument.

while you are at it, explain how colorado state, air force, and new mexico are more viable then us. add sdsu to the mix as well.

[helechopper]

How do you know this?

First off - typing on an iPhone suxxzorz.
Second - ISU is a solid academic and athletic institution with a track record of integrity.
Third - The MWC would only strengthen their profile by adding us, a current BCS member.
Fourth - Yes, all schools are out for themselves, but if KU, Kst & MU head to the MWC, then they can lobby for us if need be.

That's why. So stop freaking n00bs.

[cyfanatic]

because they already have wyoming. are you going to try and tell me that wyoming is a more viable entity than iowa state? please do i would love to hear your argument.

while you are at it, explain how colorado state, air force, and new mexico are more viable then us. add sdsu to the mix as well.

Would we bring enough money into the conference that the current members would make even more although they would be splitting revenues by a larger number of schools? If we have KU BB with us...maybe...but on our own? Not so sure of that.

[Wesley]

We need to be proactive and invite the entire Big East to the remaining 4 Big XII schools. Screw Baylor.

That is why the B12 broke up. The wheeler dealers wheeled too much.

[CYVADER]

we would arguably bring more money then any of the current schools i listed abovve do. i'm too lazy to look at the numbers, but i would be willing to bet we have a far greater attendence record in all sports then the schools i listed above. far more fans then a lot of the schools listed above

i've seen isu fans all over the country. can't say that about sdsu, wyoming, colo state, or new mexico. byu, utah, boise, tcu, air force yes. the others no way

[Wesley]

How do you know this?

It all depends if they have an odd or even number of vacancies.


Is the Big East moving too slow to be relevant?

Rutgers and Syracuse may noit move to the Big TYen and they may stand pat.

I am wondering if Maryland moves and the ACC needs a body.


If I was a t shirt conosieur I would print one with logos for ISU all together for mwc, acc, big east, and pac Ten with their league approvals.......