Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24
  1. #16
    Speechless
    Points: 322,460, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    46,650
    Points
    322,460
    Level
    100

    Re: Is Missouri to blame?

    We were chizzed.
    Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style.

  2. #17
    Legend
    Points: 289,811, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    CyCrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In a Bunker
    Posts
    13,391
    Points
    289,811
    Level
    100

    Re: Is Missouri to blame?

    Dan Beebee, he sucks at life. Enough said.

  3. #18
    Starter
    Points: 11,095, Level: 31
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 155
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Psyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    642
    Points
    11,095
    Level
    31

    Re: Is Missouri to blame?

    You are all to blame by continuing to subscribe to cable and satellite providers that carry the Big Ten Network as part of the basic package. The windfall revenue that resulted from what essentially is a hidden Big Ten Network tax on the typical American has created this money grab. Each cable subscriber in the Big 10 footprint, sports fan or not, pays around $10 a year to that network. With millions of subscribers, the total revenue is a game changer. Satellite subscribers also pay at a substantially lower rate, but the number of subscribers nationwide results in another huge revenue stream.

    I dropped back to broadcast basic when Mediacom caved to the Big 10 Network, as I couldn't in good conscious see any my money going to support ISU's rival.

  4. #19
    All-Star
    Points: 44,991, Level: 65
    Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 559
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Die4Cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,236
    Points
    44,991
    Level
    65

    Re: Is Missouri to blame?

    Quote Originally Posted by Psyclone View Post
    You are all to blame by continuing to subscribe to cable and satellite providers that carry the Big Ten Network as part of the basic package. The windfall revenue that resulted from what essentially is a hidden Big Ten Network tax on the typical American has created this money grab. Each cable subscriber in the Big 10 footprint, sports fan or not, pays around $10 a year to that network. With millions of subscribers, the total revenue is a game changer. Satellite subscribers also pay at a substantially lower rate, but the number of subscribers nationwide results in another huge revenue stream.

    I dropped back to broadcast basic when Mediacom caved to the Big 10 Network, as I couldn't in good conscious see any mys money going to support ISU's rival.
    Well put Psyclone.

    I think everyone understood that at the time that the Big Ten's effort to force BTN onto basic cable was going to be a game changer in terms of conference alignment. It was going to force an arms race toward conference TV channels which is a big part of what this re-alignment stuff is all about.

  5. #20
    Walk On
    Points: 8,658, Level: 27
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 92
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    209
    Points
    8,658
    Level
    27

    Re: Is Missouri to blame?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclonepride View Post
    He should have spent the next three days wading through expansion threads to be sure
    Oh, I didn't expect him to find it (although I can't imagine there'd be too many hits for a search of "urkel"). Just thought he'd like to know in case he wants to merge. Any other poster but CW and people would all be calling for a merge. The cool thing about CF is that it turns all of us into investigators and it'd be nice if the guy who found it before CW could also get credit (since his thread was largely ignored and this one is already a 2 pager).

  6. #21
    Addict Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oldpeopleville
    Posts
    9,207

    Re: Is Missouri to blame?

    Quote Originally Posted by Psyclone View Post
    You are all to blame by continuing to subscribe to cable and satellite providers that carry the Big Ten Network as part of the basic package. The windfall revenue that resulted from what essentially is a hidden Big Ten Network tax on the typical American has created this money grab. Each cable subscriber in the Big 10 footprint, sports fan or not, pays around $10 a year to that network. With millions of subscribers, the total revenue is a game changer. Satellite subscribers also pay at a substantially lower rate, but the number of subscribers nationwide results in another huge revenue stream.

    I dropped back to broadcast basic when Mediacom caved to the Big 10 Network, as I couldn't in good conscious see any my money going to support ISU's rival.
    Yea, it's everyone that has cable/satellite's fault the conference folded like a house of cards.
    "Seven minutes to glory."

  7. #22
    Rookie CardinalAndGold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    426

    Re: Is Missouri to blame?

    1. Texas
    2. Missouri
    3. Nebraska
    4. Dan Beebe
    5. Colorado
    "I am so proud... I am so proud to be your football coach!" -- Paul Rhoads

  8. #23
    Pro
    Points: 64,532, Level: 78
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 318
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    gogagig's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,566
    Points
    64,532
    Level
    78

    Re: Is Missouri to blame?

    Why are we still searching for someone to blame. We are screwed because we're not good enough (by whatever parameter). And for that, we can't blame anybody. You think Nebraska, TT, A&M, UT, Colorado, OU and OSU are sitting around now blaming people?

    We're not good enough. Maybe it's lack of ability. Maybe it's a lack of capacity. Maybe we didn't try hard enough. Maybe we did. Regardless- it didn't work out for us.

    And I'm sure you'll continue to support ISU no matter which conference we end up in. As will I. If we end up in a conference, that is.

  9. #24
    Pro
    Points: 45,662, Level: 66
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 1,288
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    PGreen ISU '92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Waukee, IA
    Posts
    2,143
    Points
    45,662
    Level
    66

    Re: Is Missouri to blame?

    The University of Texas should probably yield a majority of the blame. It was within their power to go along with a Big XII Network, similar to the Big Ten Network, and they refused on the grounds they wanted to expolore the possibility of their own network. As a result, the league's revenues fell behind other major conferences. They will also be the school that gives the league the death blow on Tuesday June 15th, 2010.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19