-
02-28-2012, 06:47 PM #106
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
Just a quick question.
If I'm referencing the movie Sandlot (a movie international students from Southeast Asia have probably never seen), and I talk about how much I love Squints (character from the movie almost every young American boy is probably familiar with), does that make it a racist comment because it could POSSIBLY be construed as racist towards those of Asian descent? Where do we draw the line here? International students are probably just as familiar with an obscure Iowan term for Squirrels as they are with an american movie character.
Again, this letter to the editor is absolutely fantastic. Letter to the editor: Keep us readers away from offensiveness - Iowa State Daily: Opinion -
02-28-2012, 06:47 PM #107
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
 Originally Posted by CynadoAlley I don't get the interperatation of "squintey's" meaning squirrels? Could somebody elaborate one that one for me?
The individual who selected those for publication mistook the word for a central-Iowa colloquialism for ground squirrels — more popularly referred to as “squinny.” No one came in behind to catch the error in judgment.
Strange. I've lived in central Iowa for over twenty-five years, and never heard that before.
"Hey! I'm building something here!"
--unattributed quote
-
02-28-2012, 06:49 PM #108
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
We should look back at our favorite Just Sayin's.
My favorite, "Getting up is only the second hardest thing in the morning".
-
02-28-2012, 06:50 PM #109
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
OK people, here's the facts:
"Nine striped" ground squirrels (the long, skinny ones) are called "SQUINNIES".
Chipmunks are called "grinnies".
"Back in the Day" when I worked at Outdoor Recreation, we used to have long arguments during our shifts over whether squinnies & grinnies were different or the same thing. "Fish" was our resident FWB major, and his verdict was squinnies=ground squirrels and grinnies=chipmunks. This was people from Central Iowa, NE Iowa, NW Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, and several other states.
Do I think that the kids (yeah, I'm old. GET OFF MY LAWN!!!) who put the comments in the Daily are racists? Beats the hell out of me. What kind of Madam Cleo-wannabe can tell if someone is racist or not by reading one quote from the Daily, unless that quote is "I hate blacks/Asians/Mexicans/the Dutch"?
"Correct me if I'm wrong, Scotty.......but if I kill all the golfers, they'll lock me up and throw away the key!" Carl Spackler -
02-28-2012, 06:53 PM #110
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
-
02-28-2012, 06:56 PM #111
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
 Originally Posted by clone319 The only name I call them by is leopard-spermophile.
-
02-28-2012, 08:36 PM #112
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
First 4 decades of life in Iowa - never heard the term squinty or squinney or any variation used for ground squirrels, pocket gophers or any of their obnoxious cousins. Moved to Ames 10 years ago and heard many folks use it, and yes the version I first heard was squinty. My spelling, don't know how anyone else spelled it.
First 50 some years on this planet and can't say I ever recall hearing the term squinty used as a derogatory term for people of Asian descent. Plenty of other words, but not that one.
Maybe I live on a completely different planet, but when I read the Daily that day, I immediately associated squinty with ground squirrels. Yeah, they'd win a stare down. And saw the next day an apology was issued in the Daily, saying the editor/writer thought the term was referring to ground squirrels. That should have been the end of the story.
Dropping Just Sayin' is a complete overreaction. Apologize again if you must, acknowledge a different interpretation is possible, but continue to assert the original interpretation was equally correct. Pledge to be more sensitive in the future and get on with business. Even a brief Google search turns up many references to squinty used for ground squirrels - they can't all be from Iowa. Of more amusement was the number of references to Renee Zellweger using squinty and chipmunk.
I think a whole lot of people need to get their undies unbundled on this one - Just Saying'
-
02-28-2012, 08:56 PM #113
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
So chipmunks and ground squirrels are different? They all look the same to me.
Now THAT'S racist.
-
02-28-2012, 09:41 PM #114
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
 Originally Posted by RING4CY It absolutely is the right call. If people are picking up the ISD solely for the Just Sayin's, they're picking it up for the wrong reasons, and that in of itself is a problem. Agree totally.
"Of course the people don't want war ... the people can always be brought to do the bidding of the leaders. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to greater danger."
-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials -
02-28-2012, 09:47 PM #115
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
 Originally Posted by Incyte So chipmunks and ground squirrels are different? They all look the same to me.
Now THAT'S racist. I agree. I view all squirrel-like creatures the same way, and I value them all. I don't divide them based on their stripes, dots, or other shallow features of their appearance. They are all wonderful in their own unique and special ways.
-
02-28-2012, 09:52 PM #116
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
I can very easily see how this would be interpreted as racist. It's a term I've never heard of, either in the sense of squirrels or asians, but not having read this thread I NEVER would've guessed it was referring to squirrels.
I think the Daily is doing the right thing by suspending the Just Sayin segment, so that they can take some time to review their process of accepting submissions. However, I think it's way too extreme to get rid of it all together. Making sure that stuff like that doesn't end up in the paper is the job of the editors and others who work at the Daily, not the people (occasionally, very stupid people) who submit things. That's just the nature of user submitted content.
-
02-28-2012, 09:54 PM #117
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
I have lived in Iowa my whole life and have asked 5 friends who have as well and none of us have ever heard of squinnes or grinnies or anything else. It was a squirrel or a chipmunk.
That being said I can count on one hand the number of people I know that actually read the daily, the rest myself included either don't pick it up or if we do we read the just sayin. I don't care for people ******** back and forth telling me what to think. The other issue is I get my news elsewhere faster. That's not a daily issue that's a newspaper issue.
-
02-28-2012, 09:55 PM #118
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
I know I'm probably a bit late to the game, but why not fire the editor? It is the editor's job to catch stuff like this, and clearly he has failed. Fire him, keep the section in the paper, and move on.
____________________________________
You can't die. That would upset the equilibrium in the Cave.
Warning: Posts contain 98% post-sarcastic content.
Hoiball  -
02-28-2012, 10:09 PM #119
Re: "Just Sayin" Eliminated from ISU Daily
I've grown up in central and north Iowa and have never heard the word squinny used once until now.  Originally Posted by BryceC This is just utterly stupid. Same with the chink in the armor thing. It's a dang saying and people are trying to find racism where there isn't any.
The editor didn't do the right thing. He did the easy thing. The right thing would have been to say it was a typo and no racism was intended or implied. He buckled like a belt and that takes no integrity. And you're a fool if you think "chink in the armor" wasn't intentional. Even on the very slight chance it wasn't, the author should have realized that it could and would be taken to be racist and edited that before he even typed it. It's inexcusable that something like that got through on a major media outlet. Even if it was a complete, 100% innocent mistake, he should have still been fired. I would be fired if I made a mistake of that level in my company and I think most of us are held to the same standards in our respective fields.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks