-
Last edited by DaddyMac; 06-21-2007 at 04:54 PM.
-
Re: Oldest = Smartest (?)
It's definitely true in my household!! Some people wear Superman pajamas. Superman wears Chuck Norris pajamas. -
Re: Oldest = Smartest (?)
In the study, the difference between the groups (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc) is less than 1% of total 1st born's IQ score. I suppose the data backs the theory but the differential is nothing to brag about. If first borns were scoring 120-130 and second borns were at 101, then I would be impressed.
ISU Grad 1997.
ISU Fan for Life.
Not in CO anymore but I'm not changing my name :) -
Re: Oldest = Smartest (?)
I don't think it matters, but I will say I enjoy reading opinions on here from folks in that 35-45 age range. You guys aren't any smarter, but you can't put a price on experience.
-
Re: Oldest = Smartest (?)
 Originally Posted by Drive4cy I don't think it matters, but I will say I enjoy reading opinions on here from folks in that 35-45 age range. You guys aren't any smarter, but you can't put a price on experience. It's called perspective, and having a foundation of knowledge because you have seen more. It doesn't make you a better fan or "more" right than someone else, but it does give you a better platform from which to base arguments, because both sides of an issue, are fairly apparent.
I know when I was the age of many on here, I didn't want to hear anything other than what I believed either. The world was black and white, right and wrong. The thing is, that as you get a little older, and have real life experiences, the gray that exists creeps in.
-
Re: Oldest = Smartest (?)
I know when I was the age of many on here, I didn't want to hear anything other than what I believed either. The world was black and white, right and wrong. The thing is, that as you get a little older, and have real life experiences, the gray that exists creeps in. Are you talking debates/arguments, or hair?
"Seven minutes to glory." -
Re: Oldest = Smartest (?)
Yeah, it is creeping up on me...
ISU Grad 1997.
ISU Fan for Life.
Not in CO anymore but I'm not changing my name :) -
Re: Oldest = Smartest (?)
 Originally Posted by CyinCo In the study, the difference between the groups (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc) is less than 1% of total 1st born's IQ score. I suppose the data backs the theory but the differential is nothing to brag about. If first borns were scoring 120-130 and second borns were at 101, then I would be impressed. you just cannot wrap your mind around it because you're not a first born. don't worry, we'll type slower for you ... -
Re: Oldest = Smartest (?)
 Originally Posted by clones_jer you just cannot wrap your mind around it because you're not a first born. don't worry, we'll type slower for you ...  You are right. I'm a second :(
ISU Grad 1997.
ISU Fan for Life.
Not in CO anymore but I'm not changing my name :) -
Re: Oldest = Smartest (?)
 Originally Posted by Drive4cy I don't think it matters, but I will say I enjoy reading opinions on here from folks in that 35-45 age range. You guys aren't any smarter, but you can't put a price on experience. It's also nice to be appreciated!
:)
Ala "Middle Aged" Cyclone
-
Re: Oldest = Smartest (?)
 Originally Posted by psycln11 It's definitely true in my household!!  Ditto...
(Plus, my hair isn't slowly turning gray, it's "silver" )
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks