» Site Navigation | | Home | | 08-09 Football | | 08-09 MBB | | 08-09 WBB | | 08-09 Wrestling | | Site Rules | | Photo Gallery | | Social Groups | | CyBookie | | CF Top Stats |
| | Donate! | | CF Store |
| | Forum Index | | » Forum Menu | | Forum Index | | Front-Page News | | Site News | | Feedback/Support | | Introductions | | CF Tourney Pools | | Betting Board | | Press Releases | | ISU General | | Campus Life | | ISU MBB | | ISU WBB | | ISU Football | | ISU Wrestling | | Big XII | | In-State Rivals | | General College | | Pro Sports | | Off Topic | | Politics/Religion | | Gaming & Groups | | Ticket Exchange | | CF Archive | | Restricted Forums | | Advertise Here | » 2008 Iowa State Football | | I-State vs Nebraska: |
09-24-2007, 05:59 PM
|
#1 | | Legend
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Omaha
Posts: 13,171
Credits: 1,696,981 Degree: MSCE NFL: Patriots NBA: Warriors MLB: Devil Rays | O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | | Administration Urges Social Security Fix
Administration Urges Social Security Fix Sep 24 12:41 PM US/Eastern By MARTIN CRUTSINGER
AP Economics Writer    WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration said Monday the only way to permanently fix Social Security is through some combination of benefit cuts and tax increases. That was one of the key findings in a new paper on Social Security released by the Treasury Department in an effort to achieve common ground on the politically explosive issue. "Social Security can be made permanently solvent only by reducing the present value of scheduled benefits and/or increasing the present value of scheduled tax increases," the paper said. The Treasury paper said that while other changes to the
| EIU is the other Okoboji University for serious students and home of Captain Kirk who pilots the Enterprise on its Trek through the Universe for finding his next great job. Captain, beware of your Superbowl. |
| |
09-24-2007, 06:02 PM
|
#2 | | Hall-Of-Famer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,533
Credits: 1,103,897 | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | |
This news could have been issued ten years ago. The question is whether there is the political will to address the issue. The answer to the question appears to be no.
| | |
| |
09-24-2007, 06:04 PM
|
#3 | | Hall-Of-Famer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,533
Credits: 1,103,897 | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | |
Older Americans vote in overwhelming numbers. The lobbying groups that represent them are adamantly opposed to any benefit reduction. Younger Americans do not want their taxes raised. We have a standoff that politicians want no part of.
| | |
| |
09-24-2007, 06:08 PM
|
#4 | | Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Story City, IA
Posts: 538
Credits: 915,829 Year: 1997 Degree: B.S., History NFL: Seahawks MLB: Royals | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | |
And Obama wants to eliminate taxes for seniors making $50,000 or less. Not only will I never see any return on my FICA contributions, I'll have to pay more taxes to offset the AARP crowd.
If you're in your 30's this kind of thinking should make you sick.
| | |
| |
09-24-2007, 06:20 PM
|
#5 | | Pro
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Clive, IA
Posts: 2,827
Credits: 908,575 | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | |
Everyone should be planning a future without SS. If you are not, you will have financial troubles come retirement time.
|
ISU Grad 1997.
ISU Fan for Life.
Not in CO anymore but I'm not changing my name :)
|
| |
09-24-2007, 06:27 PM
|
#6 | | Hall-Of-Famer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,533
Credits: 1,103,897 | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | | Originally Posted by Broodwich And Obama wants to eliminate taxes for seniors making $50,000 or less. Not only will I never see any return on my FICA contributions, I'll have to pay more taxes to offset the AARP crowd.
If you're in your 30's this kind of thinking should make you sick. You will see a return but unfortunately the return will be negative unless you live to be 100 plus years of age.
| | |
| |
09-24-2007, 06:37 PM
|
#7 | | Addict
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: To the right of center
Posts: 6,594
Credits: 301,352 | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | | Where's that Mr. Obvious photo from the other thread? Of course this needs to be done. But, yeah, not very many politicians have the will to do it. So we will just continue our plummet until there's no other choice. | "We have gone forth from our shores repeatedly over the last hundred years and we've done this as recently as the last year in Afghanistan and put wonderful young men and women at risk, many of whom have lost their lives, and we have asked for nothing except enough ground to bury them in, and otherwise we have returned home to seek our own, you know, to seek our own lives in peace, to live our own lives in peace." Colin Powell |
| |
09-24-2007, 08:19 PM
|
#8 | | Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Ankeny
Posts: 16,169
Credits: 4,191,658 Year: 1997 Degree: BS Com Sci NFL: Dolphins MLB: Cubs | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | |
This is why I want out! quit your socialization of america, and let me plan for my own retirement.
So I ran some quick numbers, assuming you make $50k, that is about $3500 a year in SS. Your employer also puts in $3500. $7k per year at 5% for 35 years (65-30). That is $528k. Now take that entire lump sum when you retire, and buy a 30 year annuity.
Your yearly retirement benefit from that alone is $32,000. That is $2666 a month for 30 years.
Now according to the SS.gov retirement calculator, using those same figures, your monthly SS check would be.....$1438. About $1200 a month this ponzi scheme just cost you. Pretty substantial amount of money for letting the gov steal from you.
| |
| |
09-24-2007, 08:25 PM
|
#9 | | All-Star
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Chaska, MN
Posts: 1,547
Credits: 97,356 NFL: Rams NBA: Lakers MLB: Dodgers | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | |
But us USAMERICANS are just too dumb to take care of ourselves and we would spend that money on frivolous things. I mean we need this government program to help us take care of ourselves otherwise we would just waste away and never prosper. I mean really how can you expect the public to take care of themselves without someone to do it for us?
| "It is the nature of man to rise to greatness if greatness is expected of him." John Steinbeck XBOXLive: MNclone |
| |
09-25-2007, 07:10 AM
|
#10 | | Pro
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,873
Credits: 1,361,149 | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | | Originally Posted by brianhos This is why I want out! quit your socialization of america, and let me plan for my own retirement.
So I ran some quick numbers, assuming you make $50k, that is about $3500 a year in SS. Your employer also puts in $3500. $7k per year at 5% for 35 years (65-30). That is $528k. Now take that entire lump sum when you retire, and buy a 30 year annuity.
Your yearly retirement benefit from that alone is $32,000. That is $2666 a month for 30 years.
Now according to the SS.gov retirement calculator, using those same figures, your monthly SS check would be.....$1438. About $1200 a month this ponzi scheme just cost you. Pretty substantial amount of money for letting the gov steal from you. Quit using logic.
| |
| |
09-25-2007, 07:24 AM
|
#11 | | Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: hiawatha, ia
Posts: 654
Credits: 494,743 | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | | Originally Posted by brianhos This is why I want out! quit your socialization of america, and let me plan for my own retirement.
So I ran some quick numbers, assuming you make $50k, that is about $3500 a year in SS. Your employer also puts in $3500. $7k per year at 5% for 35 years (65-30). That is $528k. Now take that entire lump sum when you retire, and buy a 30 year annuity.
Your yearly retirement benefit from that alone is $32,000. That is $2666 a month for 30 years.
Now according to the SS.gov retirement calculator, using those same figures, your monthly SS check would be.....$1438. About $1200 a month this ponzi scheme just cost you. Pretty substantial amount of money for letting the gov steal from you. that's crazy talk, you are probably a freedom hater too.
That does make a lot of sense. But what is the solution??? Maybe everyone under the age of 35 or 40 has the option of getting out and the money that would have gone to FICA goes to your 401K or you have to set up a IRA if you do not qualify for a 401K. I wouldn't mind another 10-15K/year going into my 401K.
The problem may come about, what about those you rely on S.S. when they become disabled? If they opt out of S.S. and then 10 years something happens to them and they are unable to work? S.S. does do more than just help people out when they retire.
| | |
| |
09-25-2007, 07:34 AM
|
#12 | | Addict
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: To the right of center
Posts: 6,594
Credits: 301,352 | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | | Originally Posted by erikbj that's crazy talk, you are probably a freedom hater too.
That does make a lot of sense. But what is the solution??? Maybe everyone under the age of 35 or 40 has the option of getting out and the money that would have gone to FICA goes to your 401K or you have to set up a IRA if you do not qualify for a 401K. I wouldn't mind another 10-15K/year going into my 401K.
The problem may come about, what about those you rely on S.S. when they become disabled? If they opt out of S.S. and then 10 years something happens to them and they are unable to work? S.S. does do more than just help people out when they retire. Disability insurance. Going about this whole thing privately is way more efficient than through the government, with the added bonus that the government doesn't go bankrupt. | "We have gone forth from our shores repeatedly over the last hundred years and we've done this as recently as the last year in Afghanistan and put wonderful young men and women at risk, many of whom have lost their lives, and we have asked for nothing except enough ground to bury them in, and otherwise we have returned home to seek our own, you know, to seek our own lives in peace, to live our own lives in peace." Colin Powell |
| |
09-25-2007, 07:41 AM
|
#13 | | Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: hiawatha, ia
Posts: 654
Credits: 494,743 | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | |
How come a group of 100+ guys/gals on a cyclone website can come up with better solutions to fix our problems than our "elected officials?"
Maybe CF needs to run a coup of our government and get the ship sailing straight again.
| | |
| |
09-25-2007, 08:02 AM
|
#14 | | Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Hiawatha, Iowa
Posts: 2,033
Credits: 3,500,509 NFL: Chiefs MLB: Dodgers | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | |
where do I sign up?
| | |
| |
09-25-2007, 08:03 AM
|
#15 | | Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 774
Credits: 382,848 NFL: Vikings MLB: Twins | Re: O.T. - You won't have social security to kick around in the future | | Originally Posted by erikbj How come a group of 100+ guys/gals on a cyclone website can come up with better solutions to fix our problems than our "elected officials?"
Maybe CF needs to run a coup of our government and get the ship sailing straight again. Because no one has actually come up with a solution that pays current and near future retirees their benefits and allows people to "invest their own money".
Personally I believe this country owes our retirees and disabled a safety net in case they get screwed by the insurance companies or their retirement plan holders (Enron, anyone?). That is all SS is, a safety net to provide the bare minimum needed.
| | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |