CycloneFanatic Home Football Basketball Cyclone Recruiting Schedules
» Forum Menu
New Posts
Forum Index
Site News
Feedback/Support
Introductions
CF Tourney Pools
Betting Board
Press Releases
ISU General
Campus Life
ISU MBB
ISU WBB
ISU Football
ISU Volleyball
ISU Wrestling
Big XII
In-State Rivals
General College
Pro Sports
Off Topic
Politics/Religion
Gaming & Groups
Ticket Exchange
CF Archive
Restricted Forums
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-12-2007, 08:31 AM   #1
Hall-Of-Famer
 
bellzisu's Avatar
 
R.J. Sumrall

Has anyone else noticed the lack of playing time and catches lately from him? I only remember seeing the ball thrown his way once last week and that was AA perfect pass that hit him in the hands.

I thought he would really step up this year. He has a good number of catches but he has also shown that he drops alot of passes especially at critical times. If you need reminded he had a couple big drops against kNu.

I thought we would see a healthy dose of him returning kicks and becoming a star but I guess he has different plans for himself.
bellzisu is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 08:36 AM   #2
All-Star
 
wesley_w's Avatar
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

Originally Posted by bellzisu View Post
I thought we would see a healthy dose of him returning kicks and becoming a star but I guess he has different plans for himself.
I think that's being a little rough on him. Yes, he's had a few drops, but we don't know if he's been hurt or what the reason is. Even the best of them drop balls, plus not every pass has hit him in the hands. He's also made some big plays for us and I'm glad he's on our side!!

wesley_w is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 08:51 AM   #3
Speechless
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

He has all but disappeared the last 2 weeks. Just 3 catches for 9 yards last week and none this week - with a key drop.

Perhaps the emergence of Hamilton has hurt him, not sure. Even though he's having a career year in receptions (50) and yards (420), he's been a disappointment.

His yards per catch (8.4) is way down from the first two years (15.6 and 12.4), but I don't put that all on him.


ISUFan22 is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 09:07 AM   #4
Prospect
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

R.J. has kinda become the "possesion" reciever this season. I think he may get a few more looks next season. I also wonder about Bates. Its too bad we couldn't have put redshirt on him. I am curious if he and Arnaud will be in a battle for the QB spot next year?
jdolson is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 09:13 AM   #5
All-Star
 
djcubby's Avatar
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

Originally Posted by jdolson View Post
I am curious if he and Arnaud will be in a battle for the QB spot next year?
I guess I don't see that happening since Arnaud has most of the rep's behind Meyer and Bates has been used as more of an athlete. Arnaud has looked really good when he gets a chance to play.
djcubby is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 09:13 AM   #6
Always wear a safety belt
 
DaddyMac's Avatar
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

Originally Posted by jdolson View Post
R.J. has kinda become the "possesion" reciever this season. I think he may get a few more looks next season. I also wonder about Bates. Its too bad we couldn't have put redshirt on him. I am curious if he and Arnaud will be in a battle for the QB spot next year?
I wonder how much of a battle there will be? I understand that AA is a RS frosh and PB is a true frosh. But Bates didn't see any snaps at all the last few weeks, has he? And the ones he has have all be designed runs. And Austin has some extensive playing time the last two weeks especially. Maybe that's an experience thing, except both players have the same amount of time under Chizik (except spring ball). So it's a little hard to say that AA has more time in the system.

I'm sure PB will get a look and a chance, but seems to me the writing is on the wall as to who has the clear cut lead between the two.

Personally, I really like the idea of Bates as a wideout. Although not the same type of players - it's kind of a similar situation as a Randle El when in Pitt (haven't watched Wash) or even Seneca at Seattle. A guy who can do a number of things when he has the ball. You could see alot of trickery with him as a receiver.

"He's not concerned with yesterday - he knows constant change is here today. He's noble enough to know what's right, but weak enough not to choose it. He's wise enough to win the world, but fool enough to lose it"
DaddyMac is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 09:17 AM   #7
Hall-Of-Famer
 
Kyle's Avatar
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

Originally Posted by DaddyMac View Post
Personally, I really like the idea of Bates as a wideout. Although not the same type of players - it's kind of a similar situation as a Randle El when in Pitt (haven't watched Wash) or even Seneca at Seattle. A guy who can do a number of things when he has the ball. You could see alot of trickery with him as a receiver.
I think we were about to see some trickery during the game, but we then got a penalty for lining up in the neutral zone and Bates came back off of the field. We had lined up 4 receivers to one side with Bates to the back.
Kyle is online now   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 09:19 AM   #8
Speechless
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

Right, we were in the diamond formation. I assumed we were going to run the WR screen on that play.


ISUFan22 is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 09:20 AM   #9
All-Star
 
ahaselhu's Avatar
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

The only reason we ended up getting Bates is because Chizik guaranteed him that he would get a legitimate shot to play QB, which is really what he wants to play. From what I understand he just isn't playing any QB this year because he didn't start learning the system until fall practices, and doesn't know the offense well enough at this point.
ahaselhu is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 09:22 AM   #10
Addict
 
cstrunk's Avatar
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

Originally Posted by ahaselhu View Post
The only reason we ended up getting Bates is because Chizik guaranteed him that he would get a legitimate shot to play QB, which is really what he wants to play. From what I understand he just isn't playing any QB this year because he didn't start learning the system until fall practices, and doesn't know the offense well enough at this point.
If he ends up being better than Arnaud I just may have to poop myself. If that were true he'd be good, fo sho'.

Drinkin' the Kool-Aide!



Follow my storm chasing blog at: http://centraliowastormchaser.blogspot.com/
cstrunk is online now   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 09:27 AM   #11
Prospect
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

I agree I think Arnaud has an advantage due to the snaps he has taken lately and he hasn't done anything out there to make me say "Maybe Bates should get a look.". Didn't Kansas have this situation last year. I think they started Meier at QB last year, Reesing and he were up for the same spot this year and Reesing came out the leader. It looks like Meier is doing well at WR for the Jayhawks. I hope the clones can have a similar outcome!
jdolson is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 11:05 AM   #12
All-Star
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

yea similar outcome, 10-0 i would take it haha
nickwc is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 12:19 PM   #13
Pro
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

Gotta throw Tiller into the mix as well.
PolkCityClone is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 12:30 PM   #14
All-Star
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

We've had some success turning qb's into wr's ala Austin Flynn.
Evidently a football coach now with a smoking hot fiance
Update on Former Iowa State Cyclone Austin Flynn | isuisu.com
Iastfan112 is offline   Reply
Old 11-12-2007, 12:45 PM   #15
Speechless
 
Cyclonepride's Avatar
 
Re: R.J. Sumrall

I think RJ will have a very prominent role next year, and this year wasn't all that bad. Hamilton might be the go-to receiver with RJ #2.



"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." -- Mark Twain
Cyclonepride is online now   Reply
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Contact Us | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | New Posts | CycloneFanatic | Archive | Top

Ecommerce Consulting by Kaldenberg Consulting

eTrust Pro Certified sitesecuritymonitor.com seal


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2010 vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294