-
New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
A friend of mine talked directly to Pollard about McCarney and relayed the information directly to me.
Pollard said simply considering McCarney "It is over"
I know nothing on the coordinators but in my honest opinion, I say keep Skladany and the running back coach and maybe the linebacker coach, and can the rest of em.
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
I find it hard to believe that Pollard himself would tell someone else before he informed Dan. I won't be shocked, however, if this week it's announced Dan is being let go.
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
JP cannot raise money for projects with stuff like this going on...
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
that moves my 15% chance down to 10%.
Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice? Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.  -
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
I was told that Mac and Pollard have a meeting set for Sunday after the Mizzou game to discus his future. Alford is a key to recruiting but there is no way any of them will be kept with a new coach coming in. They will want to name everyone in their staff, just like noone wanted to "have" to keep Wayne Motgan a few years ago.
I think its safe to say Jamie can start to schedule appointments now for interviews.
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
Whoever comes in cough HARBAUGH cough I would really like to see Ben Bruns in at O-line coach. He sounds kind of crazy with some of the things he says, but that is because he does not want to throw his former coach under the bus. He knows his football stuff.
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
there are a million Alfords out there... He was the one who wanted Flanders....
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
twojman, thats the best idea i've heard. I love Ben Bruns, the guy is more cardinal and gold than anybody i've ever met in my life.
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
 Originally Posted by ISUFan22 I find it hard to believe that Pollard himself would tell someone else before he informed Dan. I won't be shocked, however, if this week it's announced Dan is being let go. '
He probably told McC last week and he will make it official Sunday.
Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style. -
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
 Originally Posted by cyclonedcm JP cannot raise money for projects with stuff like this going on... I think bringing in a new coach is a good way to bring in money. What happened when McCarney came in, New Logo, New Field and New Ugly Airline Hangar Looking Thing.
He can say the same thing about Football as he did last year about basketball. Winning is Important to Me. I would be more likely to poney up the bucks with a new coach and a new direction. Why would I want to invest money into the same old thing?
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
 Originally Posted by BobCooper I meant f@ck yo cyclonedcm you F@cking ****** since the site edited the other message Bob, I think you may have some anger issues.
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
 Originally Posted by BobCooper I meant f@ck you cyclonedcm you f@cking ****** since the site edited the other message What was that all about?
-
Re: New Development on McCarney *NOT RUMOUR*
Thanks for the clarification, Bob.
Man... who let that guy in here?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks