-
Taylor - Regarding Rumors
I'm trying to confirm the information but I've had two dozen or so PM's on the matter in the last few hours so I wanted to let everybody know that I'm working on the story and hope to have things confirmed one way or another soon. I understand those that feel this shouldn't be up but thats exactly why I didn't post any rumors as to what he did or did not do. I'm taking the time to confirm it either way and posted this simply to stop the rampant speculation that would be taking place in countless threads and emails.
Last edited by Jeremy; 04-16-2007 at 07:50 PM.
A program isn't built on one player and it doesn't succeed because of one player, thus a program won't fail if it doesn't get that one player. -
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
Here I am, all pumped up to go listen to Stephanie Tanner talk to me about how I shouldn't do meth, and you have to go and kill the mood like this.
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
I woulda gone, but then I decided the only reason I would have gone was because she's pretty.
Remember that stressed spelled backwards is desserts!
"The New England Patriots: As annoying as the Yankess, just with 23 fewer titles." -
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
 Originally Posted by mwitt Here I am, all pumped up to go listen to Stephanie Tanner talk to me about how I shouldn't do meth, and you have to go and kill the mood like this. WAY off topic, but I wanted to let you know that her talk has been moved to tomorrow night. She had some trouble with her flight and couldn't make it into Iowa today.
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
 Originally Posted by mjones34 I woulda gone, but then I decided the only reason I would have gone was because she's pretty. I'm going because I used to watch Full House religiously.
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
 Originally Posted by Stumpy WAY off topic, but I wanted to let you know that her talk has been moved to tomorrow night. She had some trouble with her flight and couldn't make it into Iowa today. I'm glad I went off topic then. Thanks for the update.
Now back to Mike Taylor.
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
Cheese and rice. Is this for real? That 'deep' team we were gonna have next year is just not gonna be. No guards to teach younger players. Grrreat. It'll be 25 turnovers a game ALLL over again next season.
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
 Originally Posted by mwitt I'm glad I went off topic then. Now back to Mike Taylor. We can make it on topic, let's give it a shot:
I'm sure there was a Full House episode where Uncle Jesse had to lecture Stephanie about doing the right thing and taking responsibility after she tried to hide something she would get in trouble for.
Substitute McDermott for Uncle Jesse and Mike Taylor for Stephanie and I think we all know how this episode ends. One big happy Cyclone family.
Or not.
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
 Originally Posted by MidwestZest Cheese and rice. Is this for real? That 'deep' team we were gonna have next year is just not gonna be. No guards to teach younger players. Grrreat. It'll be 25 turnovers a game ALLL over again next season. Didn't taylor lead the NCAA in turnovers? Lets get rid of the bad apples and bring in some quality people to represent ISU.
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
We can make it on topic, let's give it a shot:
I'm sure there was a Full House episode where Uncle Jesse had to lecture Stephanie about doing the right thing and taking responsibility after she tried to hide something she would get in trouble for.
Substitute McDermott for Uncle Jesse and Mike Taylor for Stephanie and I think we all know how this episode ends. One big happy Cyclone family.
Or not.
So would i be correct in saying that Stephanie could possibly be kicked out of the house and that would open up one more chair (scholarship) for the house? How likely is it that Stephanie is going to get kicked out? What did Stephanie even do?
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
Please let it be something minor he did. Mike is desperately needed next season, but not at all costs, of course.
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
Are you seriously thinking about next year without Taylor? Personally, if this is true, and he ends up gone, I would rather have a coach that has this discipline than letting players off the hook.
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
Also, FWIW....I've heard from some a very good source that no one should be shocked if Wesley Johnson is the only starter from last year that is starting once conference season comes around next year. I'm not saying Taylor isn't a big key...he is, just thought I would throw that out there.
-
Re: Taylor - Strike 3 (?)
O my this sucks... it would suck if Taylor's gone.
We NEED him. Without him ..... we're ****ed.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks