Spiderman 3

Can someone please tell me what Sandman brought to the table? There was no consistency to him. He was nice, mean, and then nice again? I feel as if he was the worst villian of all time. He just didn't bring anything but cheese to the movie. Venom COULD have been cool but they really didn't get into that part of the movie till the very end.

For people who have not read the comics it was hard to make sense of where Venom came from and what it that machine was that turned the man into dustman! It was just so vague. Poor acting, poor plot, good special effects, and semi funny. I would rate it a C to a C-

For the most part I liked it. It wasn't as good as the first or second, and the ****** was kind of lame at times, but I was entertained (and that's all that matters). Since I got to burn movie passes on them, I didn't waste a cent either, so happy Valentine's day from my parents to my wife and me...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bostinelosd

I guess Sam and the writers took liberties changing things here and there from the comics. Not sure why, but it didnt really matter too much. I was surprised to see how the symbiote (venom) got to earth in this one. I thought JJJ's son the astronaut brought it back from space. And since they already had shown him in the second movie, was surprised they didnt continue from there.

---

Jameson did bring it back from space with him. In fact, John Jameson becomes Man-Wolf. It's hard saying why they do this or don't do that.

Hopefully it will be awhile before we see Kraven or Vulture. Do we really need to see a guy with lightning bolts coming out if his head like Electro?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clones85'

I feel as if he was the worst villian of all time.

---

Worst villian of all time? Ah my friend, you must not remember Richard Pryor in Superman III.

Or what abour Nuclear Man from Superman IV: The Quest For Peace?
They were so bad that Superman Returns was set 5 years after Superman II and didn't even acknowledge the existence of the the thrid and fourth movie.


Nice hair Nuclear Man.....

I want to take my three boys (8,6 & 4) to see the film. Could someone tell me why it's PG-13? Is it just comic book violence? My boys have seen Star Wars III (or VI or whatever they call it. The one where Anakin becomes Vader.) and they've seen the latest Batman which was pretty dark. If it's no worse violence-wise than those two I'll take them to see it.

If they have seen those movies, they are fine. There is just some action/violence. No gore or really any blood for that matter.

I can't believe I am saying this, but here it goes.........the Venom thing did not come back with Jameson, from the comic books I remember from my youth, I recall that Spiderman got the new alien costume while on another planet during the "Secret Wars".

here is the article

Sorry I let my geek out....

Saw it on Sunday and didn't love it or hate it. Just a very, very, average movie. Good thing I saw it on the big screen otherwise I think it would probably rate as below average in my book. Glad I went with the matinee "bargain" of 7.75 per ticket...:baffled5wh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bostinelosd

Have you seen Margot Kidder lately? ew

http://entimg.msn.com/i/150/ce/0404/...er_150x208.jpg

---

She is almost as hideous as snaggletooth Kirsten Dunst.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cybone

.........the Venom thing did not come back with Jameson,

---

Jenna is in this movie? Why has no one told me this before?

Yeah, it is embarrassing to say but I still have that Secret Wars comic where he gets the new costume.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brianhos

She is almost as hideous as snaggletooth Kirsten Dunst.

---

It's funny you said that. We were watching Spidey 2 this weekend and and I stated something about her teeth to my wife. She spent the rest of the movie complaining that that was the only thing she could focus on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SuperCy

Worst villian of all time? Ah my friend, you must not remember Richard Pryor in Superman III.

Or what abour Nuclear Man from Superman IV: The Quest For Peace?
They were so bad that Superman Returns was set 5 years after Superman II and didn't even acknowledge the existence of the the thrid and fourth movie.


Nice hair Nuclear Man.....

---

Haha yes those villians were as lame as they get. But I stand strong by the fact that Sandman was just as bad, if not worse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SuperCy

Secondly, why would anybody give soemthing up for Margot Kidder? Seriously, wasn't there a more attractive actress available?

---

Am I the only one who had a thing for Margot Kidder back in the late '70s?

http://www.leninimports.com/margot_k...gallery_24.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SuperCy

It's funny you said that. We were watching Spidey 2 this weekend and and I stated something about her teeth to my wife. She spent the rest of the movie complaining that that was the only thing she could focus on.

---

She sure is perrty...

http://64.111.216.18/ul/2115-KD1.jpg