Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 64
  1. #46
    Pro
    Points: 23,031, Level: 46
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 519
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran10000 Experience Points
    Skyh13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,468
    Points
    23,031
    Level
    46

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    WR's were REALLY terrible tonight. Don't know where the help is gonna come from next year... Defense is really looking up... offense is scary bad.

  2. #47
    All-Star
    Points: 11,063, Level: 31
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 187
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    InCytful's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    1,127
    Points
    11,063
    Level
    31

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Overall, I'm appreciative of the team's effort against Missouri and for the season in general. 5-7 was the record I predicted at the start, but I wouldn't have predicted the games we'd win. Defense was very good today.

    Tiller performed ok for someone with one week of the majority of snaps with the first string offense, with some pretty good throws and others not so good. O-line was pretty good most of the game against a good defense, but still had a false start and a chop block that were pretty costly. Other than a few good plays, the WR corps played terrible. Drops, poor routes, taking it easy on plays as others have mentioned. D. Reynolds missed a block on an outside run by Tiller that I think could have gone for big yards. They had other times where outside runs or screens weren't blocked well. Poor downfield blocking is some of the worst stuff you can do in a spread offense. I don't know if they need different guys or just another off-season's conditioning drills. I'm thinking more of the latter, as it can do nothing but improve this group. Take some time off for Thanksgiving and finals, and then get back to work for next year. Thanks for the effort, Seniors! Go State!

  3. #48
    Walk On
    Points: 12,512, Level: 33
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 138
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    risiusj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ames/Buffalo Center
    Posts
    196
    Points
    12,512
    Level
    33

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Just a quick little note -

    Saw Sedrick Johnson strolling around Wal-Mart with a girl a few minutes ago. Maybe I'm upset about how we ended the season, but I could, personally, never approach college football like that. Or practically anything for that matter. A little bit of inward reflection is what I think is in order. I suppose if he were the guy to operate like that he would've stopped playing like a dog a couple months ago.

    Plus, she wasn't all that hot.

  4. #49
    All-Star
    Points: 11,063, Level: 31
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 187
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    InCytful's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    1,127
    Points
    11,063
    Level
    31

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by risiusj View Post
    Just a quick little note -

    Saw Sedrick Johnson strolling around Wal-Mart with a girl a few minutes ago. Maybe I'm upset about how we ended the season, but I could, personally, never approach college football like that. Or practically anything for that matter. A little bit of inward reflection is what I think is in order. I suppose if he were the guy to operate like that he would've stopped playing like a dog a couple months ago.

    Plus, she wasn't all that hot.
    What the heck happened to Sedrick this year? After they hyped him coming into the season, he dropped down the depth chart and didn't do much. He hurt or something, or as you say, was his mind on other things than football?

  5. #50
    Addict
    Points: 177,549, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    jbhtexas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Arlington, TX
    Posts
    9,845
    Points
    177,549
    Level
    100

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by Frak View Post
    They keep bringing in multiple WRs every year and none of them are worth a crap.
    Quote Originally Posted by clonedude View Post
    This is my BIGGEST pet peeve with our recruiting. We've been sacrificing the defensive side of the ball to bring in tons of WR's, but which ones are going to pan out?
    Well, here's an idea...instead of just bringing in waves of receivers and hoping for a some good ones, maybe we could hire somebody to coach the current corps into being better players. The defense isn't loaded with 4* recruits, but they seem to be getting better.

    There have been multiple setbacks across the whole offense, not just at WR. Nobody really improved this year. Time to start taking the kids you've got and making them better. Right now, ISU is not magnet for talent. Limited athletic ability is one thing, but when there is no improvement across the entire unit, it's time to start taking the coaches to task.
    "Don't worry Boss...they can't do nothin' 'til they're through sparklin'..."

    Avatar - America's new superhero...Cenex Guy

  6. #51
    Speechless
    Points: 182,476, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 48.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    22,844
    Points
    182,476
    Level
    100

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by tazclone View Post
    This is hilarious. Arnaud has had guys dropping balls all year and it was his fault. All of a sudden, they lack effort and they need to be better. Well Tiller hit guys oin the freaking hands tongiht. This crapola that "if we only has an accurate QB" blah, blah, blahblah. This offense needs consistency improvements at every freaking position

    OL- Inconsistent all year
    WR- Inconsistent all year
    QB- Inconsistent (actually much better in conference)
    RB- Inconsistent (much better in conference particularly Texas and beyond)

    Now ask yourself when every unit is inconsistent, what do they all have in common?
    They are consistently inconsistent????

  7. #52
    Hall-Of-Famer Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by twojman View Post
    While I agree the receivers could have done a better job, 13-31 does not get it done. There were some very bad throws by Tiller and if he would have taken his time on a couple of other plays he had receivers WIDE open in the end zone he did not even see. Poor decision making by the QB, poor throws by the QB, poor hands by the WR's and the offensive line underperforming gets ISU shutout. Lots of work to do with this **** poor offense. Do we need Steve Loney to come back? ISU's offense was OUTSTANDING under him.
    Yes, he could have done better. But those drops were freaking ridiculous and they happened at bad time. You do know that Tiller's stats would look a lot better if there were 6 more completions. Get 6 more completions and you can run the ball more effectively. Open receivers in the end zone don't mean squat if they can't catch the damn ball.
    "Not at the table Carlos."

  8. #53
    Hall-Of-Famer Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by InCytful View Post
    Overall, I'm appreciative of the team's effort against Missouri and for the season in general. 5-7 was the record I predicted at the start, but I wouldn't have predicted the games we'd win. Defense was very good today.

    Tiller performed ok for someone with one week of the majority of snaps with the first string offense, with some pretty good throws and others not so good. O-line was pretty good most of the game against a good defense, but still had a false start and a chop block that were pretty costly. Other than a few good plays, the WR corps played terrible. Drops, poor routes, taking it easy on plays as others have mentioned. D. Reynolds missed a block on an outside run by Tiller that I think could have gone for big yards. They had other times where outside runs or screens weren't blocked well. Poor downfield blocking is some of the worst stuff you can do in a spread offense. I don't know if they need different guys or just another off-season's conditioning drills. I'm thinking more of the latter, as it can do nothing but improve this group. Take some time off for Thanksgiving and finals, and then get back to work for next year. Thanks for the effort, Seniors! Go State!
    Tiller was just waiting to read that block. If Reynolds forces his man out, Tiller could have cut up. If he forces him in, Tiller goes out. In the end it was a stalemate which was disappointing because Reynolds is probably our best blocking WR
    "Not at the table Carlos."

  9. #54
    Hall-Of-Famer Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,693

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by jbhtexas View Post
    Well, here's an idea...instead of just bringing in waves of receivers and hoping for a some good ones, maybe we could hire somebody to coach the current corps into being better players. The defense isn't loaded with 4* recruits, but they seem to be getting better.

    There have been multiple setbacks across the whole offense, not just at WR. Nobody really improved this year. Time to start taking the kids you've got and making them better. Right now, ISU is not magnet for talent. Limited athletic ability is one thing, but when there is no improvement across the entire unit, it's time to start taking the coaches to task.
    Shhhh. It is year two and Herman does not have his guys (even though WR is one of the easier positions to start as an underclassmen) you are not allowed to criticize him or the offensive stat.
    IMO- Two units have been really disappointing this year. OL and WR. I expected more out of both. Now the OL had some key injuries but we have heard about how deep we are. All this depth and we had to slide our C out to RT? KO moved back to an "okay" LT. Williams was our only consistent WR and even he had a 2 game stretch of the dropsies. Everyone else plateaued and even slipped
    "Not at the table Carlos."

  10. #55
    Addict
    Points: 97,291, Level: 97
    Level completed: 13%, Points required for next Level: 1,759
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bondurant
    Posts
    5,998
    Points
    97,291
    Level
    97

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Whats wrong with Jenert (sp)?

  11. #56
    Speechless
    Points: 322,460, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    46,650
    Points
    322,460
    Level
    100

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by ISUAlum2002 View Post
    Its almost like this thread was an omen to the performance that was to occur tonight. How many drops did we see tonight? I can recall two critical drops by each of Josh Lenz and Money tonight, among other drops. I realize its cold out but these guys were dropping passes that were hitting them right in the numbers, or at the very least were very catchable balls. That game was there for the taking tonight, even without our d-line putting pressure on Gabbert. The receivers blew this game tonight, big time.
    It looked like they had an inability to slow down and adjust to catch the ball. Wow, that was a ball breaker.
    Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style.

  12. #57
    Speechless
    Points: 322,460, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    46,650
    Points
    322,460
    Level
    100

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by UNIGuy4Cy View Post
    Whats wrong with Jenert (sp)?
    He needs to add some weight.
    Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style.

  13. #58
    Speechless
    Points: 322,460, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    46,650
    Points
    322,460
    Level
    100

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by InCytful View Post
    Overall, I'm appreciative of the team's effort against Missouri and for the season in general. 5-7 was the record I predicted at the start, but I wouldn't have predicted the games we'd win. Defense was very good today.

    Tiller performed ok for someone with one week of the majority of snaps with the first string offense, with some pretty good throws and others not so good. O-line was pretty good most of the game against a good defense, but still had a false start and a chop block that were pretty costly. Other than a few good plays, the WR corps played terrible. Drops, poor routes, taking it easy on plays as others have mentioned. D. Reynolds missed a block on an outside run by Tiller that I think could have gone for big yards. They had other times where outside runs or screens weren't blocked well. Poor downfield blocking is some of the worst stuff you can do in a spread offense. I don't know if they need different guys or just another off-season's conditioning drills. I'm thinking more of the latter, as it can do nothing but improve this group. Take some time off for Thanksgiving and finals, and then get back to work for next year. Thanks for the effort, Seniors! Go State!
    The wide receivers need about 50% improvement to begin tom match the other teams receivers. The downfield blocking was much better than it was in the past. The rush by MO was fairly good. The best part of MO was their people at sidelines drove into tackles and did not allow runners to fall forward. We needed to take dives over the tops of their tackles to gain more yards and we did not.
    Looking forward to CFH magic for the next bball season, Georges style.

  14. #59
    Speechless
    Points: 310,566, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    16,329
    Points
    310,566
    Level
    100

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by tazclone View Post
    Shhhh. It is year two and Herman does not have his guys (even though WR is one of the easier positions to start as an underclassmen) you are not allowed to criticize him or the offensive stat.
    IMO- Two units have been really disappointing this year. OL and WR. I expected more out of both. Now the OL had some key injuries but we have heard about how deep we are. All this depth and we had to slide our C out to RT? KO moved back to an "okay" LT. Williams was our only consistent WR and even he had a 2 game stretch of the dropsies. Everyone else plateaued and even slipped
    You can question Herman all you want but I think the questioning is focused on the wrong person. I think there are two people on the staff who need to be re-evaluated. Obviously, I don't see the day to day workings and what goes on. I can say thought that I have not seen the two people I am thinking of do their parts at this point. The thing about Herman is that he can't coach the positions and be the OC so he is reliant on 4-5 other guys to develop players he can use. The WRs have underachieved. I don't know why for sure, but here is my guess: What I believe we have in general is average receivers and an average QB. Those two together will struggle. One of those groups needs to be able to help the other out. They don't. There are tough through to average receivers. That's a not a model for consistency. Honestly, Tiller impressed me a little bit last night. I thought he made some awesome throws into small windows and I thought he made good situational throws. This talk of seperation is a little overdone. In man coverage situations, you're not going to get 5 yards. You might get two. That's where the QB comes in. I also think that when there is zone coverage, we have trouble finding the soft spots. IMO, this is coaching and last night chemistry likely had something to do with it.

    I still have complete faith in Herman. I just think there's a couple other places that I haven't seen what I thought I would see.
    I'm on Twitter too: Tre4ISU

    Or so I have read.

  15. #60
    Speechless
    Points: 296,214, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUFan22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Grimes, IA
    Posts
    29,474
    Points
    296,214
    Level
    100

    Re: ISU's Wide Receivers

    Quote Originally Posted by ISUAlum2002 View Post
    Our WR corps are consistently overrated....well, by us here on the board anyway.
    Correct. Made worse by a certain family member of a player that got a number of people here all twisted up in the hype and slobbering over his every letter.

    Quote Originally Posted by CloneFan4 View Post
    Couldn't agree more! The deep threat showed in the T Tech game but all of a sudden wasn't called upon for the rest of the season. Herman I'm looking at you.
    A deep threat is defined as a receiver that can consistently get behind defenders and make big plays. It is not defined as a player that catches one deep ball all season and then proceeds to drop passes and fumble the ball by trying to do too much.


Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19