My question is how does this guy get ok'd to be on our board when I cant get on the Hawkeye nation board. Ban this guy please.
Printable View
My question is how does this guy get ok'd to be on our board when I cant get on the Hawkeye nation board. Ban this guy please.
The RU guy loses all credibility when he says we're unproven.
I guess overlooking the fact we played one of the toughest schedules in the nation, and as well as playing in the toughest, or a barely second toughest conference in the nation.
Iowa would lose to Tech I agree, and also UNI.
It is clear that our troll believes we padded our NC schedule with cupcakes like UNI, EIU, and UCONN. Then went into the best conference in the BCS and beat 2 ranked teams and a bad KU. The RU blogger still thinks we are unproven. I guess until we beat RU, we will be unproven to this blogger. Fine. Beat down of RU begins in about 22 hours.
If we played 5 non-conference games every season, we would go bowling every year. Period.Quote:
Originally Posted by FDCy83
The New York Times today had it totally wrong: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/sp...tate.html?_r=2
They said that "In 2009, Rhoads’s first year, Iowa State beat Nebraska in Lincoln for the first time in 32 years. Iowa State broke a 36-game road losing streak to ranked opponents when the Cyclones beat Texas in Austin last season."
But the Nebraska win was actually what broke that string, because they were ranked at the end of the year. And the Texas game wasn't a win over a ranked opponent, because they weren't ranked at the end of the year. It's amazing that dimwit Hawk trolls are so much smarter than New York Times reporters.
Nevermind... i read the whole thread now.Quote:
Originally Posted by MIClone