New players listed on roster now

[BallSoHard4Cy]

ISU's Big 12 ranking
2011: 10th (88.6) ...9th place was 96.2
2010: T9th (97.0)
2009: 12th (86.7) ...11th place was 90.6
2008: T1st (100.0) ...4 teams perfect
2007: T1st (100.0) ...4 teams perfect
2006: T1st (100.0) ...5 teams perfect
2005: 7th (95.1)
2004: 11th (89.3) ...10th place was 93.9
2003: T1st (100.0) ...2 teams perfect
2002: 5th (97.9)

Were pretty bad. But only 3 years under .9 isn't terrible.

[Aclone]

Is it true that Duaron Williams is so big, they game him a three digit number?

[dualthreat]

Looks to me like the only correlation is the worse we are, the better we can kick!

[NATEizKING]

I'm going with 97% minimum.

[NATEizKING]

I could probably header in 90%.

[Cyclonepride]

Seems like most players just got to Ames. With Twitter, it's an interesting dynamic because these guys have been talking back and forth for quite a while.

[WhatchaGonnaDo]

Jake Knott #20
Luke Knott #21

I see what you did there.

[reignofthetiger]

2 guys jumped out at me:

Aka @ 255
Dagel @ 6'8" (yes I know he was a redshirt last year, but still...)

[KFitzy87]

LOL @ Jacques Washington rockin the NBA nerd glasses

[Aclone]

2 guys jumped out at me:

Aka @ 255
Dagel @ 6'8" (yes I know he was a redshirt last year, but still...)

The sizes for the incoming freshmen are those listed last signing day. We probably won't see them adjusted for accuracy before next Spring's roster.

[papaw]

Unless you have a poor deep snapper and holder the PATs should be 100%. On your FGs using the same criteria it should be around 87%.

[ISUFB]

2 guys jumped out at me:

Aka @ 255
Dagel @ 6'8" (yes I know he was a redshirt last year, but still...)

aka is probably around 275 now according to what he's told me at least
Dagel, is a legit 6'8 as well.

[cyclones500]

ISU's Big 12 ranking
2011: 10th (88.6) ...9th place was 96.2
2010: T9th (97.0)
2009: 12th (86.7) ...11th place was 90.6
2008: T1st (100.0) ...4 teams perfect
2007: T1st (100.0) ...4 teams perfect
2006: T1st (100.0) ...5 teams perfect
2005: 7th (95.1)
2004: 11th (89.3) ...10th place was 93.9
2003: T1st (100.0) ...2 teams perfect
2002: 5th (97.9)

At first, I looked at 2003 and thought "what a waste of 100% proficiency" ... then realized there were only about 20 opportunities for a PAT.

[dualthreat]

Unless you have a poor deep snapper and holder the PATs should be 100%. On your FGs using the same criteria it should be around 87%.

Does that include missed 57 yarders? Rhoads sent mahoney out a bunch of times, even if there was just a slim shot to make it...

[Messi]

Does anyone think any of these guys wont redshirt?