-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
 Originally Posted by hoosman 5-7 is exactly right. I would not be upset with that. Aren't we playing 6 ranked teams this year? We need to dump the squawks from our schedule if we want to have a winning season. I just cannot understand why anyone would not be upset if we actually end up 5-7. Also, the last part is not true at all.
Last edited by awd4cy; 06-18-2012 at 08:29 PM.
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
 Originally Posted by hoosman 5-7 is exactly right. I would not be upset with that. Aren't we playing 6 ranked teams this year? We need to dump the squawks from our schedule if we want to have a winning season. No
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
disappointed - yes; upset - no
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
 Originally Posted by awd4cy I just cannot understand why anyone would not be upset if we actually end up 5-7. Also, the last part is not true at all. 4-8 to 6-6 is where we are likely to end up this year. If we finish one game below our most likely ceiling, why would anyone be upset? If we finish one game above our most likely ceiling, I would be overjoyed. However if we finished one game below our expected floor (3 wins), I will be extremely disappointed.
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
Welcome to cf, trolls from eastern Iowa.
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
 Originally Posted by Istate 4-8 to 6-6 is where we are likely to end up this year. If we finish one game below our most likely ceiling, why would anyone be upset? If we finish one game above our most likely ceiling, I would be overjoyed. However if we finished one game below our expected floor (3 wins), I will be extremely disappointed. 6-6 is our ceiling? That would be all your opinion.
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
"too many holes to fill"??? They sure don't know CPR (yet), do they?
We got a new Marshall here in town, and his name's Paul Rhoads, and the times, they is a'changin'.
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
 Originally Posted by hoosman 5-7 is exactly right. I would not be upset with that. Aren't we playing 6 ranked teams this year? We need to dump the squawks from our schedule if we want to have a winning season. this is freaking stupid. Just the kind of loser mentality, the culture that CPR is trying to turn around. But then, some people are too shortsighted to recognize that.
We got a new Marshall here in town, and his name's Paul Rhoads, and the times, they is a'changin'.
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
5 - 7?!? That's it dammit! Two season tickets for sale - cheap or best offer!    "Explode and tear this whole town apart Take a knife and cut this pain from my heart Find somebody itching for something to start" "The Promised Land" Bruce Springsteen -
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
Here are the games in the order of likelihood that I think we will win.
1. Western Illinois. We should use this game to make a statement, not just win.
2. @ Kansas. Why was it so close last year? This should be a blowout.
3. Baylor. They will be down because of being beaten so often already by others.
4. Texas Tech. Good recruits, but we will be able to handle them early in the season.
5. @ Iowa. We should win, but Kinnick will make them tougher than they really are.
6. Tulsa. They tend to get better as the season goes on. Glad we get them early.
7. @Texas. Very winnable given their problems coming into the season.
8. Kansas State. Must win this game to get to a better bowl.
9. West Virginia. Hoping the Big 12 beats them down before they get to Ames.
10. @ TCU. They will be trying to make a strong entry into the Big 12.
11. @ Oklahoma State. Look out for some bad revenge. Still winnable.
12. Oklahoma. Toughest game, but it would be a great signature win at home.
Re-posted from previous thread objecting to some writer's projections.
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
 Originally Posted by Cycsk Here are the games in the order of likelihood that I think we will win.
1. Western Illinois. We should use this game to make a statement, not just win.
2. @ Kansas. Why was it so close last year? This should be a blowout.
3. Baylor. They will be down because of being beaten so often already by others.
4. Texas Tech. Good recruits, but we will be able to handle them early in the season.
5. @ Iowa. We should win, but Kinnick will make them tougher than they really are.
6. Tulsa. They tend to get better as the season goes on. Glad we get them early.
7. @Texas. Very winnable given their problems coming into the season.
8. Kansas State. Must win this game to get to a better bowl.
9. West Virginia. Hoping the Big 12 beats them down before they get to Ames.
10. @ TCU. They will be trying to make a strong entry into the Big 12.
11. @ Oklahoma State. Look out for some bad revenge. Still winnable.
12. Oklahoma. Toughest game, but it would be a great signature win at home.
Re-posted from previous thread objecting to some writer's projections.
these gurus are full of s**t as a christmas turkey. gurus living in south texas say we will go 12-0...if you believe that i have some beach front property for sale for you in the deserts of utah and nevada...
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
 Originally Posted by HFCS Weed halve to probably win every game butt maybe won against non-ranked teams two go 5-7 so this prediction is actually pretty respectable compared to the three and for win predictions others have maid. dude, anybody over three spells better than that
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
 Originally Posted by awd4cy 6-6 is our ceiling? That would be all your opinion. Obviously our ceiling is 12. Most people feel we'll be in that 4-8 to 6-6 window with an outside chance at 7-5 if we get Iowa at Kinnick. Anything above that is ridiculous homerism and below 4-8 is complete pessimism.
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
 Originally Posted by rhino dude, anybody over three spells better than that Not sure if serious...author of the piece said "out of the blew". It was an attempt at humor.
-
Re: CFN Estimates ISU goes 5-7 in 2012
We haven't earned the respect to be projected to go bowling. I think the team is more than capable of going again, but to ask a neutral publication do predict otherwise is a bit out of reach right now.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks