Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
The Bleacher Report is garbage, but it's a good example of how a large percentage of the extra-chromosome-possessing, buffalo wing inhaling, bad beer drinking, mouth breathing public think of Cyclone football. According to this "journalist," UNI will be the best offensive line Iowa have faced this year. Additionally, according to this reporter, Iowa State aren't world beaters. This water-headed ******'s writing is as annoying as Lou Holtz and Jim Rome's hypothetical miracle baby. Rant finished.
Breaking Down Northern Iowa's Chances of Beating the Hawkeyes | Bleacher Report
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
If you are this worked up about something this trivial, you may want to look into some anger management courses.
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
Quote:
Originally Posted by
veryphil
The Bleacher Report is garbage, but it's a good example of how a large percentage of the extra-chromosome-possessing, buffalo wing inhaling, bad beer drinking, mouth breathing public think of Cyclone football. According to this "journalist," UNI will be the best offensive line Iowa have faced this year. Additionally, according to this reporter, Iowa State aren't world beaters. This water-headed ******'s writing is as annoying as Lou Holtz and Jim Rome's hypothetical miracle baby. Rant finished.
Breaking Down Northern Iowa's Chances of Beating the Hawkeyes | Bleacher Report
The writer is a hawkeye fan, with one interesting 'stache.
David Fidler 's Sportswriter Profile | Bleacher Report
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
BR was about the only site with a crap review of KO's first game. Washington and Baltimore papers loved him.
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
Why the **** do people continue to care about what people outside the program write about us?? This team and coaches don't care and never will. Move on and move forth my fellow Clone.
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
The writer of that article predicted Iowa State to beat Iowa, in case you were wondering.
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
The linking of Bleacher Report should be a banable offense on CF
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
You got trolled by a hawk writer, amatuer.
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
If he means that UNI will not fall on it's face on the 7 yard line, than, yes the UNI offense is better than ISUs. It is painful to rewatch the replay of the ISU vs Iowa game.
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
I haven't and won't read that article but I'm sure its typical bleacher report/hawkeye bs that shouldn't even be allowed on the internet...a place where just about anything at all is allowed. I'm not worried about it and nobody else should be
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
Posting a link to Bleacher Report should result in an a****an.
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BuffettClone
I haven't and won't read that article but I'm sure its typical bleacher report/hawkeye bs that shouldn't even be allowed on the internet...a place where just about anything at all is allowed. I'm not worried about it and nobody else should be
Like I said, Bleacher Report is garbage. But the thoughts of the writer represent a large percentage of the mainstream CFB-watching public. The 'Clones are gaining rather than losing respect.
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
Bleacher Report...I stopped reading right there...
Re: Bleacher Report article: Cyclones aren't world beaters
BR is a garbage. Anyone can post there.
I recall someone writing an article about "The Best Manchester United Players of All Time" and only the players from the last 3-4 years were included except of 2-3 players (this was out of 10-15 players) One guy commented why you don't have xxxxxx (certain legends) in your list and he answered that he only started watching soccer since 2008 and didn't even know that these legends exist. He even admitted that he included 2-3 players because he heard their names regularly and had no idea about them.
I stopped reading BR since then.