Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 56 of 56
Like Tree7Likes

Thread: Turnovers

  1. #46
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 60,047, Level: 75
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 3
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Ficklone02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Urbandale
    Posts
    3,797
    Points
    60,047
    Level
    75

    Re: Turnovers

    I think our offense will improve as the year goes on. Seems the units Mess coaches tend to do that.

  2. #47
    Legend
    Points: 230,916, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Cydkar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    12,898
    Points
    230,916
    Level
    100

    Re: Turnovers

    Quote Originally Posted by awd4cy View Post
    Did you see the blocking he got from the 2nd string O-line? I don't think that it could have been any worse. I'm not sure how much of Barnett's performance we can take away from that.
    This. At least early on in his chances Barnett had no chance. We left early though (3 hour drive).
    "Missouri is free to create an enduring basketball rivalry with Auburn."

  3. #48
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 36,837, Level: 59
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 1,013
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Altoona
    Posts
    3,759
    Points
    36,837
    Level
    59

    Re: Turnovers

    Our defense will give us the opportunity to win 8 games or more. Unfortunately, if our offense continues to turn the ball over like it has, we will win 5 or 6.

  4. #49
    Prospect
    Points: 499, Level: 5
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 51
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered250 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Sioux City, IA
    Posts
    6
    Points
    499
    Level
    5

    Re: Turnovers

    Jantz's 70% plus completion rate is great improvement from last season. It seems to me that fumbles have been the bigger issue with turnovers as opposed to interceptions. Either way though, we will be a better team if we take better care of the ball.
    Kickedinthenuts likes this.

  5. #50
    Pro
    Points: 44,097, Level: 64
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 153
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    isufbcurt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    2,846
    Points
    44,097
    Level
    64

    Re: Turnovers

    Quote Originally Posted by Ficklone02 View Post
    With Jantz I wish we'd just get rid of the read option & run stuff that is more his strengths. More 4 verts & play action type stuff. I have not been big on Jantz, but at some point you do have to look at the coaches since its their job to put the players in a position where they can succeed. If Jantz is not good at running the read option, then it shouldn't be surprising that turnovers continue if we keep making him run that.
    Steele has only had one turnover running the zone read (at Iowa). The fumble the other night he was running downfield and stretched the ball out.

    Zone read is our bread and butter running play. Pistol has not worked for us yet (as in not more than a 2 yard gain) when we have run it.

    We'll be fine, look at the other position groups Mess has coached here at ISU, all turned out to play pretty good, especially special teams.

  6. #51
    Recruit
    Points: 5,261, Level: 21
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 289
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Urbandale, IA
    Posts
    103
    Points
    5,261
    Level
    21

    Re: Turnovers

    Quote Originally Posted by bos View Post
    I think thats what frustrates me the most. We have a ton of experience and some above talent with so much potential. Tighten this junk up and we could be a major threat.
    Without the turnovers against Western Illinois we almost certainly have a performance that the fans were expecting. Dominant on the field and the scoreboard. It's hard to be disappointed with a 34-point win, but we did fail to cover...

  7. #52
    Recruit
    Points: 5,261, Level: 21
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 289
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Urbandale, IA
    Posts
    103
    Points
    5,261
    Level
    21

    Re: Turnovers

    Quote Originally Posted by awd4cy View Post
    Did you see the blocking he got from the 2nd string O-line? I don't think that it could have been any worse. I'm not sure how much of Barnett's performance we can take away from that.
    True, it would have been nice to see JB get some reps with the first team OL, but he clearly made some bad decisions that were completely on him and he looked very rusty. The near pick to the DE could have been a disaster, and that play is DESIGNED to draw in the DL. That one was all JB.

  8. #53
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 52,263, Level: 70
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 287
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    awd4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    3,859
    Points
    52,263
    Level
    70

    Re: Turnovers

    Quote Originally Posted by Kickedinthenuts View Post
    True, it would have been nice to see JB get some reps with the first team OL, but he clearly made some bad decisions that were completely on him and he looked very rusty. The near pick to the DE could have been a disaster, and that play is DESIGNED to draw in the DL. That one was all JB.
    I will agree with you there. That was horrendous and that play was all on him.

  9. #54
    All-Star
    Points: 35,260, Level: 57
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 190
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    FootballinTexas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,031
    Points
    35,260
    Level
    57

    Re: Turnovers

    Quote Originally Posted by Kickedinthenuts View Post
    True, it would have been nice to see JB get some reps with the first team OL, but he clearly made some bad decisions that were completely on him and he looked very rusty. The near pick to the DE could have been a disaster, and that play is DESIGNED to draw in the DL. That one was all JB.
    Looked to me like the RT was supposed to cut the DE and he whiffed. They didn't replay it so I couldn't tell for sure. Someone correct me if im wrong. BTW, whoever that RT is has a rough night against that DE. He was the cause of a lot of the pressure JB was getting.

  10. #55
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 63,850, Level: 78
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 1,000
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    d4nim4l's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    West Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    4,733
    Points
    63,850
    Level
    78

    Re: Turnovers

    Quote Originally Posted by FootballinTexas View Post
    Looked to me like the RT was supposed to cut the DE and he whiffed. They didn't replay it so I couldn't tell for sure. Someone correct me if im wrong. BTW, whoever that RT is has a rough night against that DE. He was the cause of a lot of the pressure JB was getting.
    This is correct. Just watched the replay. Almost completely whiffed on him.

    Barnett's pick over the middle was exactly what I thought it was when I saw it live: an adjustment by WIU based on film and a bad route by Bundrage.

    WIU moved their coverage to the middle and Bundrage originally ran what looked like a hitch and then came into the middle of the field. Ball was kind of late/Bundrage wasn't there. Three WIU guys made the pick look completely awful.

  11. #56
    All-Star
    Points: 35,260, Level: 57
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 190
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    FootballinTexas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,031
    Points
    35,260
    Level
    57

    Re: Turnovers

    Quote Originally Posted by d4nim4l View Post
    This is correct. Just watched the replay. Almost completely whiffed on him.

    Barnett's pick over the middle was exactly what I thought it was when I saw it live: an adjustment by WIU based on film and a bad route by Bundrage.

    WIU moved their coverage to the middle and Bundrage originally ran what looked like a hitch and then came into the middle of the field. Ball was kind of late/Bundrage wasn't there. Three WIU guys made the pick look completely awful.
    Ok. I saw they rolled the coverage to the short side of the field. On the play he checked to Bundrage on the fade they rolled to wide side and manned tge short side. probably expecting a bubble screen

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19