Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 177
Like Tree65Likes

Thread: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

  1. #61
    Starter
    Points: 27,462, Level: 50
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 88
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    MartyFine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Warren Co., IA
    Posts
    857
    Points
    27,462
    Level
    50

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    Have not read the entire thread, but I imagine that UNI comes cheaper than some of the other I-AA schools do and they obviously do not demand a return game like some of the Non-BCS D1 schools do from ISU (or a lot of money if they don't get that).

    Also, I saw someone early in thread state that if UNI is a tough game then that is an ISU problem. Could not agree more. We have no chance against today's Big 12 if we cannot handle UNI.
    Cydkar likes this.

  2. #62
    Pro
    Points: 73,554, Level: 84
    Level completed: 24%, Points required for next Level: 1,296
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    ribsnwhiskey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,311
    Points
    73,554
    Level
    84

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    All the ******** is pretty pointless. We're locked in with UNI for 7 games. You all should email Pollard with your dissatisfaction. The only way this game goes away is when the NCAA decides games against FCS teams no longer count toward bowl eligibility, which would actually improve the state of the game IMO.

  3. #63
    Speechless
    Points: 376,469, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    alarson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    18,750
    Points
    376,469
    Level
    100

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    Quote Originally Posted by cycarob View Post
    Honestly, I'd rather not play a FCS team. Why not play a team from the WAC for our 12th game (assuming it's not collapsing, which it probably is)? Wouldn't that be cheaper? Probably an easy win as well.
    Nope. A really low level FBS opponent costs more, because not only are they a buy-a-win program, if you buy them you can also still buy another FCS team and have 2 guaranteed wins towards bowl eligibility.

  4. #64
    Rookie
    Points: 10,261, Level: 30
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 289
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    F5cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    391
    Points
    10,261
    Level
    30

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    By the time some of these games will be played, UNI will be D-1 anyway.

  5. #65
    Speechless
    Points: 376,469, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    alarson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    18,750
    Points
    376,469
    Level
    100

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    Quote Originally Posted by CyFan61 View Post
    On a somewhat related note, I would just like to see 7 home games every year. We shouldn't be playing 6 home/6 away anymore, like we will be doing next year.

    We have 5 home/5 away locked in with the Big 12 schedule plus Iowa, every season. An FCS game is an automatic home game. We should be paying a mid-major to come to JTS every season for the 7th home game... not scheduling home-and-homes.
    Agreed. Was good when we got out of the Utah return, and getting out of the Tulsa return wouldnt be a bad thing either.

  6. #66
    All-Star
    Points: 30,351, Level: 53
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 499
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Me State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Altoona
    Posts
    1,325
    Points
    30,351
    Level
    53

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    The game won't be on tv so it will cause UNI fans to get one month subscriptions to Cyclones.tv every year they play. Every year most will forget to cancel their subscription after the game so ISU will get 2 months of payments at least. ISU will make back some of the money they are paying to UNI.
    Cyrok and ISUAgronomist like this.

  7. #67
    Pro
    Points: 40,975, Level: 62
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 675
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    Omaha Cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The Omaha, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,448
    Points
    40,975
    Level
    62

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    uni is typically good competition. i like the game. i would like to see it get scheduled in week 6 or whatever some year though just to shake things up a little.

  8. #68
    All-Star
    Points: 34,691, Level: 57
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 759
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registered25000 Experience Points
    Tailg8er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    West Des Moines
    Posts
    1,845
    Points
    34,691
    Level
    57

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    Quote Originally Posted by ribsnwhiskey View Post
    All the ******** is pretty pointless. We're locked in with UNI for 7 games. You all should email Pollard with your dissatisfaction. The only way this game goes away is when the NCAA decides games against FCS teams no longer count toward bowl eligibility, which would actually improve the state of the game IMO.
    Yeah, but then UNI would probably just find a way to bump up to FBS. They don't wanna lose their super bowl from the schedule, ya know!

    As for to play UNI or not, I'm in the "play them" crowd. While I enjoy watching the Clones play whoever, & it's great getting a chance to see the younger guys, the atmosphere in JTS Saturday was just blah.

  9. #69
    Addict
    Points: 168,719, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    MNCyGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Norwalk
    Posts
    8,147
    Points
    168,719
    Level
    100

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    I get the argument against scheduling UNI, I really do. However I LOVE this for two reasons:

    1) I still feel like it adds more entertainment value to my tickets than any other FCS game (exempting maybe rubbing a win over NDSU in the faces of the smug Bison alumni I went to HS with).

    2) I assume JP consulted some with Rhoads before scheduling this game. We know Rhoads hasn't been shy about his preference to schedule more winnable non-conference games. The length of this agreement shows me that unlike our fans, Rhoads has NO fear of this game going forward. Let's just stomp Farley for the next decade and end the whole delusion that they are at our level.
    Ry4Cy likes this.

  10. #70
    Starter
    Points: 23,811, Level: 47
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 739
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    CycloneVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    850
    Points
    23,811
    Level
    47

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    I have said this before, for those of you worried about Mark Farley shooting his mouth off, that ball is in ISU's court. Beat them 52-0 I bet his mouth stays shut. I remember 2004 where they were talking about if Brett Meyer started at qb as a freshman that they would beat us, well under 100 yards of offense later and a 23-0 shutout they kept their mouth shut for a while. I remember sitting behind the UNI bench yelling "Talk is Cheap" as well. Talk was also cheap this last week in Kinnick too, all I heard all week was that UNI was gonna beat them, guess not.

  11. #71
    Pro
    Points: 93,635, Level: 95
    Level completed: 26%, Points required for next Level: 1,415
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    vmbplayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Rochester
    Posts
    3,209
    Points
    93,635
    Level
    95

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    My thoughts on this:

    1) based on Pollard's Quote
    "We are excited to extend our contract with UNI because our games have been some of the best attended contests in Jack Trice Stadium history,"
    We are planning on bowling in the stadium soon because what is the point of being excited about record attendance for UNI vs record attendance for WIU. You only need a boost to attendance numbers if you have an even larger stadium. 2 Tier south End zone is on Pollard's radar screen.

    2) If UNI were to become an FBS team (as hoped by Farley in his presser last week) that would be great for ISU. Why? We'd get credit for playing and FBS quality opponent (UNI is better than most low tier FBS schools). We can then Schedule UNI and Western Illinois/NDSU types the same season and count both as bowl eligible wins. That makes our SOS easier for once because you replace the Tulsas with UNI and UNI with Western Illinois. If you're a ISU fan you really are pulling for UNI to move to the FBS as Farley would like to do. Locking in a contract now that is half an FBS payout for games 11 and 9 years from now could prove to be an excellent ROI.

    3) If people are worried about losing to UNI hurting us so badly maybe we should work on getting good enough to flat out beat them no contest every time we play them and it won't matter. The days of losing to the Panthers are behind us folks. If you're still concerned about this I would suggest you haven't been paying attention to where the programs in this state are headed. If we get back to the point we're worried about losing to UNI again we will have seen a significant fall off from where we currently are and our biggest concern shouldn't be why we scheduled ourselves to play UNI.


    4) The only downside here is opponent variety, but that doesn't matter to me at all. Why? Because if I scheduled someone outside UNI I'd pick a no name directional school for a free W instead of a team I'd enjoy seeing us play from a BCS league every day of the week because we can't add more burden to our schedule.
    "Blamo"! The new CF approved swear word.

  12. #72
    Legend
    Points: 230,910, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Cydkar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    12,897
    Points
    230,910
    Level
    100

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    Quote Originally Posted by Me State View Post
    The game won't be on tv so it will cause UNI fans to get one month subscriptions to Cyclones.tv every year they play. Every year most will forget to cancel their subscription after the game so ISU will get 2 months of payments at least. ISU will make back some of the money they are paying to UNI.
    Jamie, is that you? It seems there are people that still don't trust your judgement. Baffling, I know. Thanks, and take care.

    Cydkar
    "Missouri is free to create an enduring basketball rivalry with Auburn."

  13. #73
    Prospect
    Points: 309, Level: 3
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 41
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    31 days registered250 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    6
    Points
    309
    Level
    3

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    Can we replace Iowa with UNI for a new version of the Cy-Hawk game each year? Cy-Panther game? Just kidding. On serious note, why is the game never held at the UNI dome whenver ISU or Iowa play against UNI. I know it is a smaller venue by far, but you think the Panthers should get to have a home game against ISU or Iowa every once in the while.

  14. #74
    Addict
    Points: 212,695, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 64.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered50000 Experience PointsSocial
    CyArob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    5,483
    Points
    212,695
    Level
    100

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    Quote Originally Posted by alarson View Post
    Nope. A really low level FBS opponent costs more, because not only are they a buy-a-win program, if you buy them you can also still buy another FCS team and have 2 guaranteed wins towards bowl eligibility.
    Gotcha. Thanks.

  15. #75
    Speechless
    Points: 522,477, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    ISUAgronomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Back in Iowa!!!!!!!!
    Posts
    20,101
    Points
    522,477
    Level
    100

    Re: Scheduling agreement with Northern Iowa

    Quote Originally Posted by isu5000 View Post
    Can we replace Iowa with UNI for a new version of the Cy-Hawk game each year? Cy-Panther game? Just kidding. On serious note, why is the game never held at the UNI dome whenver ISU or Iowa play against UNI. I know it is a smaller venue by far, but you think the Panthers should get to have a home game against ISU or Iowa every once in the while. Just kidding some more.
    FIFY
    Cyrok and CyFan61 like this.


Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19