Was that punt in the Endzone?

[Incyte]

Don't touch backs come back to the 25 now? That's 22 yards of field position. From section 2 it looked like it clearly hit the goal line.

[keepngoal]

Don't touch backs come back to the 25 now? That's 22 yards of field position. From section 2 it looked like it clearly hit the goal line.

Cy. Only on kickoffs.... Punts go to the 20.

-keep

[BBHMagic]

What are the odds that the offense was good for an 80 yard drive?

Not too good, but as you can see from my post, it would have changed field position a lot for Oklahoma making it hard for them to score the put away touchdown.

[TykeClone]

what team do you root for?

-keep

Apparently the refs.

[cyinne]

what team do you root for?

-keep

Apparently the refs.

I root for Iowa State. I am a realist and understand that calls go both ways. I drink just as much kool ade as the next person, i just dont think that referees are out to "get" us.

[isucy86]

It was inconclusive.. The camera angle was not straight on so it wouldmake it look like it touched the line. The ref had a better angle than the camera.

[jrios545]

I'm going to have to watch the replay. I was standing in the student section, fourth pretty much perpendicular to the goal line and it was clear to me that the not only did the ball hit the goal line but also hit green grass in the endzone.

[IcSyU]

I'm going to have to watch the replay. I was standing in the student section, fourth pretty much perpendicular to the goal line and it was clear to me that the not only did the ball hit the goal line but also hit green grass in the endzone.

And you're full of ****.

Honestly people, exercise some intelligence when posting. They're really going to mess up by 6 inches? Half the damn ball would've been in the endzone.

[ISUCubswin]

And you're full of ****.

Honestly people, exercise some intelligence when posting. They're really going to mess up by 6 inches? Half the damn ball would've been in the endzone.

No, I was there too. I'm not being a smartass, the refs missed the call. The one ref looked at the other ref because he had no idea if it crossed or not, and the other ref just let it play out.

[IcSyU]

No, I was there too. I'm not being a smartass, the refs missed the call. The one ref looked at the other ref because he had no idea if it crossed or not, and the other ref just let it play out.

Touching the green in the endzone? There is absolutely NO way that poster isn't full of ****. I didn't see a replay but the fact that people are making the argument it's inconclusive tells me that there is absolutely no way that the ball was even CLOSE to the green on the endzone.

[stevefrench]

whose got a screen shot??

[shagcarpetjesus]

People who have seen the TV replay and are swearing that the ball is obviously in the end zone are wearing some seriously cardinal-and-gold tinted shades. What I saw on TV was pretty much the definition of inconclusive evidence. The edge of the ball looked to be just about even with the edge of the goal line. There was no way the replay ref was going to overturn the call on the field.

[VikesFan28]

Clearly the entire ball was in the endzone and the refs made a bad call.

In all seriousness though, I was pretty certain that it hit the goal line when it happened live. I know we're all biased, but I believe what I see with my own eyes. A screenshot could end this. Where you at, Aggie?

[Jeffreyisu]

Just watched the replay. CLEARLY touches the white line. SMH.

[CyCloned]

It was very, very close and I had a lot less trouble with that then when the center fumbled and the refs threw a flag on the play, really bailed them out.