I know that some people like him as a corner, I just thought he might prove to be an awesome successor to Jacques Washington. Either way, I hope he stays.Quote:
Originally Posted by swarthmoreCY
Printable View
I know that some people like him as a corner, I just thought he might prove to be an awesome successor to Jacques Washington. Either way, I hope he stays.Quote:
Originally Posted by swarthmoreCY
Look around Charlie, all the freshmen redshirted
anyone know if pavlenko is gonna play somewhere else? as far as remaining schollys, i would like campos and a LB or 2
Exactly, should be plenty of pt at the corner position next year. IMO, we have Jansen Watson and that's about it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by swarthmoreCY
Lynn/Stokes/Richardson/Lawry...we will have plenty of people out there.Quote:
Originally Posted by ripvdub
Yeah we are fine at corner. Hopefully Stokes gets better or gets jumped by someone though because I'm not sure we will do so hot with him as our #2 for a full year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tre4ISU
How about we wait for real info before lambasting Charlie.
Almost all have expressed their hopes that it is not true because he is going to be a great player. Saying you do not understand why he would leave now is not a dig at Charlie.Quote:
Originally Posted by simply1
He can go to JUCO and then play 3 years somewhere. That's far from a bad move considering he'd had to fight for PT next year. If he doesn't like it at ISU, he may as well make the move. He's a young kid. We have another RS stud in Lawry, who has probably been dwarfed by a single comment about Rogers being a potential NFL guy.Quote:
Originally Posted by swarthmoreCY
I think he's just sick of Daley burning him. :smile:
That was not the discussion. The reason given earlier in the thread was he did not like the coaches redshirt policy. If that is true, what does leaving after the redshirt do besides be an attempt at retribution or a retaliation for being redshirted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc
I think he will/would see a lot of PT next year- not much of a fight.
If astericks have to be included with his name, then the post should not be made. There is no reason at all to question whether he is all in, is a stupid ******, etc, imo. How you say it with Charlie's name most certainly comes across as a premature dig.Quote:
Originally Posted by swarthmoreCY
We don't know that he's not all in. We don't know that he's ****** about redshirting. Speculating that he is and how stupid it would be is crap.
14. :psmile:Quote:
Originally Posted by ISUAlum2002
Like I said, almost all have not done this. You can quote the post(s) that offended you, it is not too hard.Quote:
Originally Posted by simply1
Maybe a dumb question -- what is a greyshirt?Quote:
Originally Posted by CYphyllis
If we lose a guy or two due to the Red Shirt policy, I'm fine with that. It's a great policy long term that I think will ultimately help the team.Quote:
Originally Posted by swarthmoreCY