Page 19 of 19 FirstFirst ... 91516171819
Results 271 to 278 of 278
Like Tree71Likes

Thread: ***OFFICIAL FIRE MESSINGHAM THREAD***

  1. #271
    Starter
    Points: 14,988, Level: 37
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 662
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Arlington Heights, IL
    Posts
    805
    Points
    14,988
    Level
    37

    Re: ***OFFICIAL FIRE MESSINGHAM THREAD***

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclophile1 View Post
    That varies quite a lot by QB and whether it's inside or outside zone really. Outside zone just takes longer to develop and it seemed like Messingham thought our guys do better with a higher ratio of outside zone to inside zone. Younger and less experienced QBs will often have a tougher time making that key read and so I think that's one reason why I think we have the perception that Barnett runs it better than Jantz (which is accurate in my view). The problem is that you are going to have problems if you cannot execute the inside zone - most everything you are going to do is predicated off this building block setup, and we struggled quite a lot with it. Of all the spread concepts, inside zone is the most basic, straight up technique in the package - it's really just an old-fashioned veer dive option which allows the RB to freelance on what gap opens and run to it, or QB keep based on optioning the backside DE. We seemed to have a problem all year just getting hat on hat blocks to make this work well. While we weren't great at inside zone (despite White being pretty good a jamming the playside quickly), I do think we were better at outside zone but we were wildly inconsistent at it. Frustrating to watch honestly.

    Cheers
    I think part of the problem with the zone is merely we are taking to long to read it. I don't know when I see other teams run it the read is fairly quick. Either the DE crashes or he doesn't. This read taking a split second longer is the difference in there being a hole and there not.

    I watched the majority of the Northwestern game yesterday. I don't think their athletes are much better than ours but their zone read takes that split second less than ours and gives their QB and backs an ability to make plays.

    To me this is coaching. I would rather the QB make a quick decision wrong decision than to hesitate and not give us any opportunity. With time he would start making the right decision.

    In away all year to me it seems our QBs are afraid to make a mistake, which isn't a good enviroment for them to be in. Yes mistakes are bad, but just as important is that they made a decision. They are young and inexperience we have to live with them making bad throws, wrong reads. But it seems like they are scared to make the decision and that is much worse. Makes me wonder if Mess is complete ******* on the practice field.
    A world without yoga pants and Planter's cheese balls, is a world I no longer want to live in.

  2. #272
    Starter
    Points: 23,692, Level: 47
    Level completed: 15%, Points required for next Level: 858
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cyclophile1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    731
    Points
    23,692
    Level
    47

    Re: ***OFFICIAL FIRE MESSINGHAM THREAD***

    Quote Originally Posted by boone7247 View Post
    I think part of the problem with the zone is merely we are taking to long to read it. I don't know when I see other teams run it the read is fairly quick. Either the DE crashes or he doesn't. This read taking a split second longer is the difference in there being a hole and there not.

    I watched the majority of the Northwestern game yesterday. I don't think their athletes are much better than ours but their zone read takes that split second less than ours and gives their QB and backs an ability to make plays.

    To me this is coaching. I would rather the QB make a quick decision wrong decision than to hesitate and not give us any opportunity. With time he would start making the right decision.

    In away all year to me it seems our QBs are afraid to make a mistake, which isn't a good enviroment for them to be in. Yes mistakes are bad, but just as important is that they made a decision. They are young and inexperience we have to live with them making bad throws, wrong reads. But it seems like they are scared to make the decision and that is much worse. Makes me wonder if Mess is complete ******* on the practice field.
    Oh no question about it that Barnett makes the read a beat faster and consequentially, it runs better with him. I think Sam does pretty well with it for a redshirt freshman. Jantz was just freaking horrible at it and seemed to be just flipping a dadgum coin on his reads. It does make a real difference in how the plays work certainly, but I would argue that our OL struggled mightily developing blocks doing IZR so much that the defenses didn't really need to respect us at all. That kills all your play-action pass package, let's you bring an extra guy in the box without much fear, blows up all your Y-action plays. It's just bad, bad, bad.

    Calls into question the QB coaching to a degree, but the OL coaching and development even more so. You just aren't going to be successful in this kind of spread without being able to do something as basic as IZR.

    I like what I have seen some Richardson, so I'm hopeful. He's a good thrower and I hope we don't screw up his head.

    Cheers

  3. #273
    Rookie
    Points: 9,748, Level: 29
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 202
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CascadeClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    373
    Points
    9,748
    Level
    29

    Re: ***OFFICIAL FIRE MESSINGHAM THREAD***

    Quote Originally Posted by tyler24 View Post
    He's a hell of a position coach...just demote him.
    Think I agree with this. Didn't he coach special teams when we actually had a good return game a year or two ago?

    But can you demote a guy after promoting him? Awkward.

  4. #274
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 54,118, Level: 72
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 1,432
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    erikbj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    hiawatha, ia
    Posts
    3,940
    Points
    54,118
    Level
    72

    Re: ***OFFICIAL FIRE MESSINGHAM THREAD***

    Quote Originally Posted by CascadeClone View Post
    Think I agree with this. Didn't he coach special teams when we actually had a good return game a year or two ago?

    But can you demote a guy after promoting him? Awkward.
    Better than being fired.....ask the previous isu oc's who were fired on how their careers are going

  5. #275
    Speechless
    Points: 310,419, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    16,310
    Points
    310,419
    Level
    100

    Re: ***OFFICIAL FIRE MESSINGHAM THREAD***

    Quote Originally Posted by CascadeClone View Post
    Think I agree with this. Didn't he coach special teams when we actually had a good return game a year or two ago?

    But can you demote a guy after promoting him? Awkward.
    I don't think so. Besides, you would have to get rid of someone anyway. Keeping him around probably wouldn't do much good.
    I'm on Twitter too: Tre4ISU

    Or so I have read.

  6. #276
    All-Star
    Points: 35,102, Level: 57
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 348
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,018
    Points
    35,102
    Level
    57

    Re: ***OFFICIAL FIRE MESSINGHAM THREAD***

    Quote Originally Posted by Tre4ISU View Post
    I don't think so. Besides, you would have to get rid of someone anyway. Keeping him around probably wouldn't do much good.
    I think the only possible demotion would be to WR coach and Sturdy to OC. Unless Bleil would get fired and slide Mess there and Rhoads makes an outside hire for OC.

  7. #277
    Starter
    Points: 14,988, Level: 37
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 662
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Arlington Heights, IL
    Posts
    805
    Points
    14,988
    Level
    37

    Re: ***OFFICIAL FIRE MESSINGHAM THREAD***

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclophile1 View Post
    Oh no question about it that Barnett makes the read a beat faster and consequentially, it runs better with him. I think Sam does pretty well with it for a redshirt freshman. Jantz was just freaking horrible at it and seemed to be just flipping a dadgum coin on his reads. It does make a real difference in how the plays work certainly, but I would argue that our OL struggled mightily developing blocks doing IZR so much that the defenses didn't really need to respect us at all. That kills all your play-action pass package, let's you bring an extra guy in the box without much fear, blows up all your Y-action plays. It's just bad, bad, bad.

    Calls into question the QB coaching to a degree, but the OL coaching and development even more so. You just aren't going to be successful in this kind of spread without being able to do something as basic as IZR.

    I like what I have seen some Richardson, so I'm hopeful. He's a good thrower and I hope we don't screw up his head.

    Cheers
    Just so I am clear I don't have a problem with Richardson. I do have a problem with what appears to be no progress in our offense in 4 years, under a new scheme. I understand some of the guys up front are young/inexperienced, but to me that puts even more of a magnifying glass on the coaching staff. They have to do everything to get the guys prepared. Basically if we can't run what should be a staple of our offense, we are ****ed. And if we have redshirt guys unable to do it they aren't getting the proper coaching. I look at it like this, we have low to mid level D1 talent, currently. If they can't sustain a blocks on a staple of our offense that isn't their fault that is the coaching staff not preparing them propertly. If it was redshirt freshman, on the first game of the year, I wouldn't worry, but we had the same problems all year, and on the last game of the year we had horrible problems with it, against a non BCS opponent. Tulsa was a good team, but they weren't as good as we made them look.
    A world without yoga pants and Planter's cheese balls, is a world I no longer want to live in.

  8. #278
    Pro
    Points: 98,206, Level: 97
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 844
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Boxerdaddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Beaverdale, IA
    Posts
    2,634
    Points
    98,206
    Level
    97

    Re: ***OFFICIAL FIRE MESSINGHAM THREAD***

    I just don't like the read as our main run game. We don't have the right qb to be running this style. Our qbs have been effective at runnning but you really need a cody green or Kline type of qb or even like Gino. Right now I just don't think our personnel fits the style we're trying to run. I worry everytime our qbs take off running that they will get injured. (or fumble) As mentioned by numerous others it just takes too long for our run game to develop. Too many 3 and outs and that kills a defense.

Page 19 of 19 FirstFirst ... 91516171819

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19