CycloneFanatic

Go Back   CycloneFanatic > Iowa State > Football
Forgot Password? | Sign Up!
Register Members Mark Forums Read

Notices

Please help support CF, Donate Today!

» Site Navigation
Home
08-09 Football
08-09 MBB
08-09 WBB
08-09 Wrestling
Site Rules
Photo Gallery
Social Groups
CyBookie
CF Top Stats

Donate!
CF Store

Forum Index
» Forum Menu
Forum Index
Front-Page News
Site News
Feedback/Support
Introductions
CF Tourney Pools
Betting Board
Press Releases
ISU General
Campus Life
ISU MBB
ISU WBB
ISU Football
ISU Wrestling
Big XII
In-State Rivals
General College
Pro Sports
Off Topic
Politics/Religion
Gaming & Groups
Ticket Exchange
CF Archive
Restricted Forums
Advertise Here


Post New Thread  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2008, 11:28 AM   #16
Addict
 
jdoggivjc's Avatar
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Originally Posted by mjones34 View Post
Not to be a Debbie Downer, but as much as I love our WR skill and depth, I'm still concerned about our line giving QBs enough time to get it to them.
I thought we did a pretty decent job protecting Meyer last year (he at least had more than the count of 2 to get rid of the ball), and they're all back and getting manhandled by Shep as we speak. I remember hearing someone say the OL wasn't exactly a concern this year (although it's something we've always got to keep on building due to graduation)

Attempt #4
The ongoing story of the persistent attempts to get to the other side.


jdoggivjc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 11:36 AM   #17
Hall-Of-Famer
Donor 
 
clones_jer's Avatar
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Why don't we just throw the ball to Sedrick Johnson? It's so frusterating, we haven't thrown to him all year!

"clones_jer--you're right" - mvhm 9/9/8
clones_jer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 11:46 AM   #18
Starter
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Right now our OL may be our strength.....Not to mention all starters are back, don't count on all the starters keeping their jobs....

I've been a fan of Big Trey's for a long time, this guy looks the part, size, feet, speed, and that lil piece of nasty you need for a dominant OL player.....He will be a stud - mark it!!!!

But, the word i was hearing last year was about Kelechi Osemele, he's supposed to be a beast.

Considering we still have Vargas, Pinkelman, Klerekoper, Alvarez, Vanstrom, Hulbert, Steinback all as either FR or RFR players, not to mention our new Commits, our OL is young, athletic, and under shep's world - eatin right, lifting and gettin big, mean, and tough....our OL is the least of my concerns....

My concern is the D, we couldnt stop anyone last year, now we lose arguable our three best defensive players in Rubin, Banks, & Bowen, we need some young guys to step up and play some big time ball....Our secondary will get a huge injection of talent.....cant wait to see spring ball and see if Johnson, Benton, Land and if Darks goes over to D all competing for Playing time this year.
KMAC_ATTACK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 11:58 AM   #19
Addict
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

I agree Kmac, losing both Rubin and Braaksma is going to require some guys to step up. Some of the guys on the o-line will need to gain some weight like Dedrick but they have all offseason to do that.

I don't think Vargas is on the team anymore though.
BryceC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 12:10 PM   #20
Rookie
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

I remember from one of Chizik's pre-game interviews last year, that he felt that one of our major weaknesses was yards after catch by our receivers.
Just seemed like every time somebody caught a ball, they were immediately tackled on the spot by the first defender there.
Hopefully some of the new guys have the strength to break tackles or the speed to run away from defenders. We need to have some plays where we throw a 5 yard pass and the receiver runs for 15 more yards before he is tackled.
CyCy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 12:59 PM   #21
Pro
Donor 
 
cstrunk's Avatar
 
Send a message via AIM to cstrunk Send a message via MSN to cstrunk
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Originally Posted by CyCy View Post
I remember from one of Chizik's pre-game interviews last year, that he felt that one of our major weaknesses was yards after catch by our receivers.
Just seemed like every time somebody caught a ball, they were immediately tackled on the spot by the first defender there.
Hopefully some of the new guys have the strength to break tackles or the speed to run away from defenders. We need to have some plays where we throw a 5 yard pass and the receiver runs for 15 more yards before he is tackled.
Agreed. I pointed this out this past season while watching KU receivers. They did a great job of it, while ours did not. They were also very good blockers, where ours would hit and block but a lot of times they couldn't sustain the block, especially long enough for the running back to get by them.

I also think Arnaud is going to do a better job than Meyer at hitting the open receivers. We saw hints of this during games last season. He just needs experience and he's going to get plenty of it this season IMO.

Chizik: "One thing that I’d encourage our fans…I want them to be the loudest stadium in the Big 12. I don’t care…I want Jack Trice stadium to be the loudest in the Big 12 and I think that creates homefield advantage.... I want to stress to everyone…I want this place to be juiced up. They bought 36,000 season tickets so there is a passion there…don’t hide it…let it out. I want there to be a passion in the stadium."

I-S-U!

cstrunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 01:03 PM   #22
All-Star
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Originally Posted by every_yard View Post
Add Houston Jones and Derron Montgomery to that list. Montgomery has suffered from injuries in the past so hopefully he can stay healthy this year and contribute somewhere.

I'm not sure if these two will see much playing time, but I'd say they have potential
Montgomery is healthy enough to be putting up some pretty decent times in the 400M for the track squad.

Meet Results
Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 01:04 PM   #23
7 Star Recruit
Donor 
 
cys_av8r's Avatar
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Originally Posted by cstrunk View Post
I also think Arnaud is going to do a better job than Meyer at hitting the open receivers. We saw hints of this during games last season. He just needs experience and he's going to get plenty of it this season IMO.
AND he is much more mobile than Mr. Molasses Meyer. I can see him creating extra time with his legs.

A free people claim their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.
Thomas Jefferson
cys_av8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 01:12 PM   #24
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Originally Posted by CyCy View Post
I remember from one of Chizik's pre-game interviews last year, that he felt that one of our major weaknesses was yards after catch by our receivers.
Just seemed like every time somebody caught a ball, they were immediately tackled on the spot by the first defender there.
Hopefully some of the new guys have the strength to break tackles or the speed to run away from defenders. We need to have some plays where we throw a 5 yard pass and the receiver runs for 15 more yards before he is tackled.
So true. Some of it was the routes they ran and plays called, some was because they didn't do a good job of getting upfield after the catch and other times it was because the other receivers just quit on the play once they realized they were not getting the ball.

I do think our receiving group did not play well as a "team". Not a lot of guys sacrificing themselves for the sake of others. I'd hope this will be rectified this fall.

Hamilton strikes me as a guy that can lead this charge.

ISUFan22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 01:26 PM   #25
Asst. Regional Manager
Donor 
 
mjones34's Avatar
 
Send a message via AIM to mjones34
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Originally Posted by cys_av8r View Post
AND he is much more mobile than Mr. Molasses Meyer. I can see him creating extra time with his legs.

So true. I loved Meyer, but he'd have daylight and I mean DAYLIGHT and a 600 pound lineman who had fallen over 3 different times in the play would catch him.

Remember that stressed spelled backwards is desserts!

"The New England Patriots: As annoying as the Yankess, just with 23 fewer titles."
mjones34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 06:07 PM   #26
Bench Warmer
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

With the number of players on the OL this year will anyone be possibly moved to the DL.
singsing is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 06:32 PM   #27
All-Star
 
cycloneman003's Avatar
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

i think the best thing about this is how much better hamilton has been getting, that allows sedrick johnson to come in as the #2 or 3 guy and wont have tons of pressure and high expectations on him right away... with range, johnson, carlson and company the recievers are looking good for the next couple years

why do the flag in jack trice always fly to the east?
-cuz the hawks suck, and the huskers blow
cycloneman003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2008, 06:35 PM   #28
All-Star
 
cycloneman003's Avatar
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Originally Posted by singsing View Post
With the number of players on the OL this year will anyone be possibly moved to the DL.
ADRIN HAUGHTON! i will die if we leave this kid on the OL.... hes 6'4" 323 lbs for crying out loud! he even runs a 4.9sec 40! this kid could be a monster at DT and would provide immediate impact... just watching his highlight videos hes one of the fastest guys of that size ive seen in quite some time and would provide a solid replacement after losing tuba to graduation

why do the flag in jack trice always fly to the east?
-cuz the hawks suck, and the huskers blow
cycloneman003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 08:27 AM   #29
Bench Warmer
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Originally Posted by CyCy View Post
I remember from one of Chizik's pre-game interviews last year, that he felt that one of our major weaknesses was yards after catch by our receivers.
Just seemed like every time somebody caught a ball, they were immediately tackled on the spot by the first defender there.
Hopefully some of the new guys have the strength to break tackles or the speed to run away from defenders. We need to have some plays where we throw a 5 yard pass and the receiver runs for 15 more yards before he is tackled.
I think Bret Meyer has to take his share of the blame for lack of YAC by the receivers. It's not enough to just get the ball in the general vicinity of an open receiver, you've got to give the guy a chance to turn it into something. How many times did you see a receiver running open in the middle of the field or down the sideline and have to adjust to a poorly thrown ball. Mayer almost never hit guys in the numbers or hands on the dead run, seemed like most throws were behind them, low or high, or something that would disrupt their momentum.

I don't think he is entirely to blame, but Meyer definitely contributed to the problem.
mjlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2008, 08:28 AM   #30
Bench Warmer
 
Re: RECEIVERS!!!

Originally Posted by cstrunk View Post
Agreed. I pointed this out this past season while watching KU receivers. They did a great job of it, while ours did not. They were also very good blockers, where ours would hit and block but a lot of times they couldn't sustain the block, especially long enough for the running back to get by them.
Yes, the KU receivers did a great job of holding and not getting called for it.
mjlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Post New Thread  Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM.


vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
All content owned by CycloneFanatic.com and Jeremy Lind - All rights reserved 2005-08. By viewing this website you agree to the Terms of Service, Site Rules and Legal Disclaimer. The words, views, images and opinions expressed or provided by users do not reflect the opinions or views of CycloneFanatic.com, Jeremy Lind or Iowa State University. The names, words, symbols, and graphics representing Iowa State University are trademarks and copyrights of the University protected by the trademark and copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries and are used on this web site under license from the University. Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26