| Please help support CF, Donate Today! | » Site Navigation | | Home | | 08-09 Football | | 08-09 MBB | | 08-09 WBB | | 08-09 Wrestling | | Site Rules | | Photo Gallery | | Social Groups | | CyBookie | | CF Top Stats |
| | Donate! | | CF Store |
| | Forum Index | | » Forum Menu | | Forum Index | | Front-Page News | | Site News | | Feedback/Support | | Introductions | | CF Tourney Pools | | Betting Board | | Press Releases | | ISU General | | Campus Life | | ISU MBB | | ISU WBB | | ISU Football | | ISU Wrestling | | Big XII | | In-State Rivals | | General College | | Pro Sports | | Off Topic | | Politics/Religion | | Gaming & Groups | | Ticket Exchange | | CF Archive | | Restricted Forums | | Advertise Here |
 | |
04-23-2008, 11:32 AM
|
#16 | | Bench Warmer
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Altoona, IA
Posts: 294
Credits: 922,939 Year: 2001 Degree: MIS/TransLog | Originally Posted by jtaconutz Another reason teams are going to the no huddle is that if used effectively it should allow for more offensive plays per game. More offensive plays = more scoring opportunities. I think that's exactly what Pinkel said when asked why Mizzou switched.
| | |
| |
04-23-2008, 11:37 AM
|
#17 | | Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 635
Credits: 1,901,228 | Originally Posted by jtaconutz Another reason teams are going to the no huddle is that if used effectively it should allow for more offensive plays per game. More offensive plays = more scoring opportunities. That theory works well if you offense either moves the ball and continues to run the clock or scores. However, if your increase in offensive plays resluts in more 3 and outs, it allow the other team's offense to run more plays.
Either way, I would rather be the agressor than sit on the ball and be conservative.
| | |
| |
04-23-2008, 06:44 PM
|
#18 | | Bench Warmer
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Rompots
Posts: 232
Credits: 334,213 |
Not to burst anyone's bubble, but no huddle has been around for at least 15 years. If it were a clear advantage all teams would run it all the time.
| | |
| |
04-23-2008, 09:14 PM
|
#19 | | Bench Warmer
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Burlington
Posts: 273
Credits: 1,006,774 |
If we aren't deeper than our opponent, and we're ahead on the scoreboard, the no-huddle seems like it wouldn't help us; but it would keep defenses off-guard and it would also help when time is running down on the game clock. I'm guessing we woudn't use it with impunity.
| | |
| |
04-23-2008, 09:39 PM
|
#20 | | Walk On
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Kansas
Posts: 163
Credits: 1,274,790 | Originally Posted by l2alphmacchio If anyone here has watched CIML football, I believe that when we run the no-huddle it will be a lot like Johnston's offense. My brother was a senior this year and told me that McFarland spent a couple of days watching them practice. This may have been just to watch Guyer kick, but my brother swears he was scouting their offense. Scary. I hope we are not basing our offensive strategies on central Iowa high school programs. Sounds Waldenesque.
| | |
| |
04-24-2008, 08:56 AM
|
#21 | | Bench Warmer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 288
Credits: 868,912 |
I doubt we're "basing our offensive strategies" off high school football teams. But if someone does one thing REALLY well, better than you're doing it now, isn't it at least worth exploring in the off season? Coaches learn a lot from each other, regardless of the level of play. Several of the coaches at the clinic mentioned that they've integrated methods from high school coaches when the players just couldn't figure something out. It's not just a matter of how much you know, but how well can you teach it to your players.
| | |
| |
 | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.