CycloneFanatic

Go Back   CycloneFanatic > Iowa State > Football
Forgot Password? | Sign Up!
Register Members Mark Forums Read

Notices

Please help support CF, Donate Today!

» Site Navigation
Home
08-09 Football
08-09 MBB
08-09 WBB
08-09 Wrestling
Site Rules
Photo Gallery
Social Groups
CyBookie
CF Top Stats

Donate!
CF Store

Forum Index
» Forum Menu
Forum Index
Front-Page News
Site News
Feedback/Support
Introductions
CF Tourney Pools
Betting Board
Press Releases
ISU General
Campus Life
ISU MBB
ISU WBB
ISU Football
ISU Wrestling
Big XII
In-State Rivals
General College
Pro Sports
Off Topic
Politics/Religion
Gaming & Groups
Ticket Exchange
CF Archive
Restricted Forums
Advertise Here


Post New Thread  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2008, 09:35 AM   #16
Starter
 
cycloneryan's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Classic example of a player built for college football and not the NFL
cycloneryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 09:49 AM   #17
Starter
 
mplscyclone's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by twojman View Post
Agreed, you cannot teach 6'5".
I know a few people that are 6'5 that could NOT play football.

Blythe isn't a complete player and he's injury prone. I was thinking my Junior year that if he were to bulk up, he could play TE and would be a good red zone target.....

The problem is that Blythe can't block and because he's so injury prone, he probably couldn't handle how physical TE could be.

Really too bad, as he had a lot of potential, and I hope he finds something he can do in his life that makes him happy!
mplscyclone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 09:53 AM   #18
Pro
 
Clones85''s Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by mplscyclone View Post
I know a few people that are 6'5 that could NOT play football.

Blythe isn't a complete player and he's injury prone. I was thinking my Junior year that if he were to bulk up, he could play TE and would be a good red zone target.....

The problem is that Blythe can't block and because he's so injury prone, he probably couldn't handle how physical TE could be.

Really too bad, as he had a lot of potential, and I hope he finds something he can do in his life that makes him happy!
Todd Blythe is injury prone?!?! This is a new development. I know that Ex- ISU WR Montgomery took a cheap shot at Blythe and tore his ACL. Other than that was he ever hurt? Did he ever miss a game due to injury?

I love the Blythe haters on this board. They really know what they are talking about
Clones85' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 09:53 AM   #19
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

I wouldn't call Todd injury prone at all. He had the pancreas issue, which is not a football injury. The only other one that I can recall was his ACL before the sophomore season.

He simply didn't develop beyond that year and failed to do the little things right.

ISUFan22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 09:54 AM   #20
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by Clones85' View Post
I love the Blythe haters on this board. They really know what they are talking about
Couldn't care less what you call the group that sees Todd for who he is.

He's simply not an NFL caliber receiver. At least today. Perhaps his eyes will open, he'll get a coach that will ride his tail and he'll become what he could be.

But today? Nope.

ISUFan22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:02 AM   #21
Pro
 
Clones85''s Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by ISUFan22 View Post
Couldn't care less what you call the group that sees Todd for who he is.

He's simply not an NFL caliber receiver. At least today. Perhaps his eyes will open, he'll get a coach that will ride his tail and he'll become what he could be.

But today? Nope.
I didn't mention anything about him in the NFL. It is the people that try to downplay him at ISU. The guy did some pretty unreal things at ISU and people don't appreciate it b/c they expected him to be an All American. That is just wrong. He had 4 times more TD in ONE GAME than our top two WR's this year have had in their careers.

I just don't understand how people can take a guy who set all these records at Iowa State, and did it with a below average QB, and be critical b/c he didn't live up to their expectations.
Clones85' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:05 AM   #22
Starter
 
mplscyclone's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by ISUFan22 View Post
Couldn't care less what you call the group that sees Todd for who he is.

He's simply not an NFL caliber receiver. At least today. Perhaps his eyes will open, he'll get a coach that will ride his tail and he'll become what he could be.

But today? Nope.

Exactly. His problem is that no one ever pushed him. He was a star in High School and a star in college. The coaching staff here didn't push him to be his best; they were happy with where he was at.

I wouldn't place all the blame on him, but when you've always been considered good, a lot of athletes don't have that internal drive to become the best and see holes in their game.

If a coach tells him something that would help them develop, they take it personally.

I don't know all of the details, but I'm sure Blythe was always told he was doing fine, no one pushed him, and he didn't push himself. He was a good college WR, the best we've had in a while, but he just didn't have the drive to become an NFL talent.

I wouldn't write him off completley, but he's more of a possesion receiver and I can't think of a developmental league that he could participate in that would help him get to the NFL, as he isn't built for the AFL.
mplscyclone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:05 AM   #23
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by Clones85' View Post
I didn't mention anything about him in the NFL. It is the people that try to downplay him at ISU. The guy did some pretty unreal things at ISU and people don't appreciate it b/c they expected him to be an All American. That is just wrong. He had 4 times more TD in ONE GAME than our top two WR's this year have had in their careers.

I just don't understand how people can take a guy who set all these records at Iowa State, and did it with a below average QB, and be critical b/c he didn't live up to their expectations.
Hmm, some hypocrisy here. Meyer did some amazing things here too, yet he's below average and Todd isn't?

Both guys could have, and should have, been much better. I firmly believe both got comfortable, the staff allowed it and we saw it on the field.

Yes, Todd was a very good collegiate receiver. Not once did I discount that. However, I'm not sure I consider him great. In ISU standards, probably. In national standards? Not quite.

It's very easy to see what Todd fell short in doing when watching a couple ISU games.

ISUFan22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:15 AM   #24
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by mplscyclone View Post
Exactly. His problem is that no one ever pushed him. He was a star in High School and a star in college. The coaching staff here didn't push him to be his best; they were happy with where he was at.

I wouldn't place all the blame on him, but when you've always been considered good, a lot of athletes don't have that internal drive to become the best and see holes in their game.
Right. I have little doubt we'd be having a very difference conversation about him had he played under the current staff for more years than he did under the former staff.

I also think he could have taken it more upon himself to get better. In the end, he is the one that is likely to miss out on some big bucks.

ISUFan22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:15 AM   #25
Pro
 
Clones85''s Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by ISUFan22 View Post
Hmm, some hypocrisy here. Meyer did some amazing things here too, yet he's below average and Todd isn't?

Both guys could have, and should have, been much better. I firmly believe both got comfortable, the staff allowed it and we saw it on the field.

Yes, Todd was a very good collegiate receiver. Not once did I discount that. However, I'm not sure I consider him great. In ISU standards, probably. In national standards? Not quite.

It's very easy to see what Todd fell short in doing when watching a couple ISU games.
If you don't know the difference between a player of Meyer's caliber and Blythe's caliber, than let me know and I will stop arguing with you right now.

I have had this same argument with you before ISUFan22. You like to downplay Blythe as a Cyclone b/c he didn't block. You even make the claim that Hamilton is a better WR than Blythe (mainly b/c he is a better blocker). That is all I need to hear to know that I shouldn't waste my time arguing with you
Clones85' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:18 AM   #26
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Todd's inability to block is just one part of it. How about his lack of crisp route-running? Him virtually being a one-dimensional receiver?

How often do you hear people saying Todd is a possession receiver? A guy that will routinely go across the middle? Make key blocks for ya? Sell the play even when he's not going to get the ball?

You don't. Those things are huge in what level of quality a receiver is.

ISUFan22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:26 AM   #27
Addict
 
Re: Blythe is waived

I think the only reason people get down on Blythe (myself included) is that I think he had the ability to be an All-Conference type player. For an abundance of reasons already stated that never happened. Both he and Meyer accomplished a lot of great things in a Cyclone uniform based on our record books, but on a national or even Big 12 level they were not great amongst their peers as their careers wore on. And I really don't think that is really debateable.

I also think that he is a victim of the Mac hype machine that really pumped him up into sounding like he is one of the best players in the nation.
BryceC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:29 AM   #28
Pro
 
Clones85''s Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by ISUFan22 View Post
Todd's inability to block is just one part of it. How about his lack of crisp route-running? Him virtually being a one-dimensional receiver?

How often do you hear people saying Todd is a possession receiver? A guy that will routinely go across the middle? Make key blocks for ya? Sell the play even when he's not going to get the ball?

You don't. Those things are huge in what level of quality a receiver is.
His lack of route running caught him 176 passes and 31 TD's.

Listen you obviously are pretty set in your ways. I will just say ask this. Do you remember Blythe running in's or posts, catching the ball, getting drilled, holding onto the ball, and getting up? You should because he did it many times.

I am not saying that Todd was the greatest blocker in the world but he is not nearly as bad as you make him out to be. Go back and watch the Toledo game last year. How bout the Nebraska game. He had some key blocks in that game
Clones85' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:30 AM   #29
Addict
 
jdoggivjc's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by ISUFan22 View Post
I wouldn't call Todd injury prone at all. He had the pancreas issue, which is not a football injury. The only other one that I can recall was his ACL before the sophomore season.

He simply didn't develop beyond that year and failed to do the little things right.
I know the guy had mono- I don't know if that's the pancreas problem you're referring to. That being said, mono's not an injury-prone either. Then again, if he focused more on football prep and less on playing suckface...

Attempt #4
The ongoing story of the persistent attempts to get to the other side.


jdoggivjc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:31 AM   #30
Addict
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by Clones85' View Post
His lack of route running caught him 176 passes and 31 TD's.

Listen you obviously are pretty set in your ways. I will just say ask this. Do you remember Blythe running in's or posts, catching the ball, getting drilled, holding onto the ball, and getting up? You should because he did it many times.

I am not saying that Todd was the greatest blocker in the world but he is not nearly as bad as you make him out to be. Go back and watch the Toledo game last year. How bout the Nebraska game. He had some key blocks in that game
Todd's size garnered him those stats.

His route running was marginally better than mine. His cuts had more curves than Carmen Electra.

He was a fine receiver who was bigger and stronger than most of the defenders playing him. And he could hold on to the ball well. But I would submit that if his route running was better, his stats could have been much, much better.

Last edited by DaddyMac; 08-26-2008 at 10:34 AM.
DaddyMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Post New Thread  Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.