CycloneFanatic

Go Back   CycloneFanatic > Iowa State > Football
Forgot Password? | Sign Up!
Register Members Mark Forums Read

Notices

Please help support CF, Donate Today!

» Site Navigation
Home
08-09 Football
08-09 MBB
08-09 WBB
08-09 Wrestling
Site Rules
Photo Gallery
Social Groups
CyBookie
CF Top Stats

Donate!
CF Store

Forum Index
» Forum Menu
Forum Index
Front-Page News
Site News
Feedback/Support
Introductions
CF Tourney Pools
Betting Board
Press Releases
ISU General
Campus Life
ISU MBB
ISU WBB
ISU Football
ISU Wrestling
Big XII
In-State Rivals
General College
Pro Sports
Off Topic
Politics/Religion
Gaming & Groups
Ticket Exchange
CF Archive
Restricted Forums
Advertise Here


Post New Thread  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2008, 10:31 AM   #31
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

I saw mild improvements in both route running and some blocking last season. Which goes toward my point I've made many times - I feel we'd be having a very different chat about Todd had be been with this staff more than just one season.

ISUFan22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:31 AM   #32
Pro
 
Clones85''s Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by BryceC View Post
I think the only reason people get down on Blythe (myself included) is that I think he had the ability to be an All-Conference type player. For an abundance of reasons already stated that never happened. Both he and Meyer accomplished a lot of great things in a Cyclone uniform based on our record books, but on a national or even Big 12 level they were not great amongst their peers as their careers wore on. And I really don't think that is really debateable.

I also think that he is a victim of the Mac hype machine that really pumped him up into sounding like he is one of the best players in the nation.
He had almost 1900 yds, 18 TD's and averaged 20 yds a reception after his sophomore year. I don't think Mac's hype machine had anything to do with it.

His junior year the o line was so bad that Meyer couldn't get him the ball. Last year Meyer was so gun shy that he couldn't get him the ball
Clones85' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:32 AM   #33
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
I know the guy had mono
Mono, yes - thanks.

ISUFan22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:33 AM   #34
Addict
 
jdoggivjc's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by ISUFan22 View Post
Todd's inability to block is just one part of it. How about his lack of crisp route-running? Him virtually being a one-dimensional receiver?

How often do you hear people saying Todd is a possession receiver? A guy that will routinely go across the middle? Make key blocks for ya? Sell the play even when he's not going to get the ball?

You don't. Those things are huge in what level of quality a receiver is.
Don't forget that Todd's also never going to be confused with someone that can run. Any given advantage that he would have had over the corner that was going to cover him simply because he plays offense is gone because he can't run clean routs nor can he run in general.

Attempt #4
The ongoing story of the persistent attempts to get to the other side.


jdoggivjc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:36 AM   #35
Addict
 
jdoggivjc's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by Clones85' View Post
He had almost 1900 yds, 18 TD's and averaged 20 yds a reception after his sophomore year. I don't think Mac's hype machine had anything to do with it.

His junior year the o line was so bad that Meyer couldn't get him the ball. Last year Meyer was so gun shy that he couldn't get him the ball
And yet you forget to mention all those plays that Blythe took off ON THE FIELD when the ball wasn't going to be thrown in his direction. That and you fail to mention all those times he gave up on a play when he'd have to lay out side-to-side in order to make the play. If the ball wasn't thrown in a 3' wide x 8' tall box the guy gave up on the play.

Attempt #4
The ongoing story of the persistent attempts to get to the other side.


jdoggivjc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:40 AM   #36
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Todd's job was always safe, from the moment he stepped foot on the field for the first time to when he left. It was a known fact - no doubt at all.

The biggest benefit for our team and individual receivers this fall - not one single person's job is safe. Including Hamilton and Sumrall. We have some very nice young talent that reportedly has been shining in practice. This will only make each player better.

Todd was never really pushed like that. Complacency goes a long way toward taking a person with phenomenal potential and making them just average or good - instead of great.

ISUFan22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:43 AM   #37
Addict
 
jdoggivjc's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by ISUFan22 View Post
Todd's job was always safe, from the moment he stepped foot on the field for the first time to when he left. It was a known fact - no doubt at all.

The biggest benefit for our team and individual receivers this fall - not one single person's job is safe. Including Hamilton and Sumrall. We have some very nice young talent that reportedly has been shining in practice. This will only make each player better.

Todd was never really pushed like that. Complacency goes a long way toward taking a person with phenomenal potential and making them just average or good - instead of great.
I honestly think one of the best things that has happened to the Iowa State offense in a really long time is that Blythe has moved on. The other thing is that he took Meyer with him...

Attempt #4
The ongoing story of the persistent attempts to get to the other side.


jdoggivjc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:45 AM   #38
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

It's not that we needed these guys gone, I liked their talent in many regards.

But we need their attitude gone. I'm not saying their attitudes were poor, but they played under a different staff with very different rules. One of the biggest factors in improving from last year to this year will be attrition.

ISUFan22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:46 AM   #39
Addict
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Alright - this discussion has run it's course and is getting a little testy.

Some think Todd's play/effort/skills were adequate, some don't. And Brett is getting drug in as well.

Regardless, they both were fine players for ISU. The both played four years, never left the program, never got in any notable trouble that I can recall, and never put themselves or the program in a bad light.
DaddyMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:47 AM   #40
Addict
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Clones85' - I don't think anybody is saying he was terrible. I think people are expressing disappointment in that he could have been much better. He was a very solid ISU WR. However, in my mind, and I could be completely wrong, he just never really blew me away with the exception of a few games. The A&M game was amazing. The CU game was amazing last season. The OT's against Toledo were great. Todd was also plagued by inconsistency throughout his career including the 2005 season which was his only All-Conference year.

How much of that was his fault is debateable, but I don't think it's all the O-Line's fault or Meyer's fault as you make it out to be. Some games he was great and I'll never forget him for that. Some games he was almost non-existent, but ultimately he was never as good as he probably could have been and he will likely never play a down in the NFL. He had a great career as a Cyclone but it will ultimately be forgotten by the masses as the team never won a lot and he never really made a name for himself as a great player nationally.
BryceC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:47 AM   #41
Addict
Donor 
 
isucyfan's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by DaddyMac View Post
Alright - this discussion has run it's course and is getting a little testy.

Some think Todd's play/effort/skills were adequate, some don't. And Brett is getting drug in as well.

Regardless, they both were fine players for ISU. The both played four years, never left the program, never got in any notable trouble that I can recall, and never put themselves or the program in a bad light.
Totally agree.

While they may not have reached the potential we thought they could, and didn't take the program to new heights, they were great kids that did a lot as Cyclones.

I am not going to badmouth them for that.
isucyfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:49 AM   #42
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by BryceC View Post
Clones85' - I don't think anybody is saying he was terrible. I think people are expressing disappointment in that he could have been much better. He was a very solid ISU WR. However, in my mind, and I could be completely wrong, he just never really blew me away with the exception of a few games. The A&M game was amazing. The CU game was amazing last season. The OT's against Toledo were great. Todd was also plagued by inconsistency throughout his career including the 2005 season which was his only All-Conference year.

How much of that was his fault is debateable, but I don't think it's all the O-Line's fault or Meyer's fault as you make it out to be. Some games he was great and I'll never forget him for that. Some games he was almost non-existent, but ultimately he was never as good as he probably could have been and he will likely never play a down in the NFL. He had a great career as a Cyclone but it will ultimately be forgotten by the masses as the team never won a lot and he never really made a name for himself as a great player nationally.
+1

ISUFan22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:49 AM   #43
Pro
 
Clones85''s Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
And yet you forget to mention all those plays that Blythe took off ON THE FIELD when the ball wasn't going to be thrown in his direction. That and you fail to mention all those times he gave up on a play when he'd have to lay out side-to-side in order to make the play. If the ball wasn't thrown in a 3' wide x 8' tall box the guy gave up on the play.
Wrong. How many times did Meyer throw the ball high and Blythe went up to get it? Only to get hammered? This post lacks knowledge

Originally Posted by ISUFan22 View Post
Todd's job was always safe, from the moment he stepped foot on the field for the first time to when he left. It was a known fact - no doubt at all.

The biggest benefit for our team and individual receivers this fall - not one single person's job is safe. Including Hamilton and Sumrall. We have some very nice young talent that reportedly has been shining in practice. This will only make each player better.

Todd was never really pushed like that. Complacency goes a long way toward taking a person with phenomenal potential and making them just average or good - instead of great.
He was never really pushed but yet put up numbers that put him in the top 10 nationally in YPC. Top 20 in TD's, and Top 20 in yards in the country as a freshman and sophomore?

The people that downplay his success mind boggle me. He was a Cyclone. We should be embracing him, not nit picking at everything he didn't do as well as we would have liked
Clones85' is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:53 AM   #44
Speechless
Donor 
 
ISUFan22's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by Clones85' View Post
Wrong. How many times did Meyer throw the ball high and Blythe went up to get it? Only to get hammered? This post lacks knowledge
Things are getting testy, no doubt. From just one side.


Originally Posted by Clones85' View Post
He was never really pushed but yet put up numbers that put him in the top 10 nationally in YPC. Top 20 in TD's, and Top 20 in yards in the country as a freshman and sophomore?
Again, many of us are disappointed that after those seasons, the guy was very quiet both compared to those years and nationally. He came out of the gate strong but finished poorly.

Originally Posted by Clones85' View Post
The people that downplay his success mind boggle me. He was a Cyclone. We should be embracing him, not nit picking at everything he didn't do as well as we would have liked
Loved Todd, a lot. Still do. But I don't blindly worship the players I love. They're often the ones I'm harder on, because I know they can be better. Todd is a perfect example of such.

ISUFan22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:55 AM   #45
Bench Warmer
 
ISUCLONES15's Avatar
 
Re: Blythe is waived

Originally Posted by Clones85' View Post
He was a Cyclone. We should be embracing him
+1 and end of discussion!
ISUCLONES15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post New Thread  Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Threaded Mode