Kick or Receive?

FDCy83 · 08-28-2008, 05:51 PM

I would defer, but I would be thinking also that we should be leading by alot by the time the 3rd quarter starts that it doesn't matter. But I also like the idea of beating up on this team for a half, go through halftime while thier team recovers somewhat, and then take the first posestion of the 2nd half and run it right down their throats again.

LindenCy · 08-28-2008, 05:54 PM

Definitely defer.

Wesley · 08-28-2008, 06:54 PM

Originally Posted by Cybyassociation

Which will we be doing, and why would you want it that way?

Kicking their butt.

Aclone · 08-28-2008, 06:59 PM

Originally Posted by CarolinaCy

Conventional wisdom says to always defer. Screw conventional wisdom in this game. Against this team, you take the ball, shove it straight down their throat for about 10 plays before punching it in for 6. That should let them know that the big boys came to play and we ain't screwin' around.

My thought exactly. You defer when you want the best advantage. In this case, we already have the best advantage. Just come out, cram the ball down their throat--and let them decide in the scond half, when they're down four touchdowns (or more).

CloneIce · 08-28-2008, 07:08 PM

Originally Posted by CarolinaCy

Conventional wisdom says to always defer. Screw conventional wisdom in this game. Against this team, you take the ball, shove it straight down their throat for about 10 plays before punching it in for 6. That should let them know that the big boys came to play and we ain't screwin' around.

Im with you. Exactly. In conference I'd defer. Against I-AA..... put points up right away.