| Please help support CF, Donate Today! | » Site Navigation | | Home | | 08-09 Football | | 08-09 MBB | | 08-09 WBB | | 08-09 Wrestling | | Site Rules | | Photo Gallery | | Social Groups | | CyBookie | | CF Top Stats |
| | Donate! | | CF Store |
| | Forum Index | | » Forum Menu | | Forum Index | | Front-Page News | | Site News | | Feedback/Support | | Introductions | | CF Tourney Pools | | Betting Board | | Press Releases | | ISU General | | Campus Life | | ISU MBB | | ISU WBB | | ISU Football | | ISU Wrestling | | Big XII | | In-State Rivals | | General College | | Pro Sports | | Off Topic | | Politics/Religion | | Gaming & Groups | | Ticket Exchange | | CF Archive | | Restricted Forums | | Advertise Here |
 | |
08-29-2008, 10:56 AM
|
#16 | | Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 566
Credits: 5,056 | Re: Total plays: 62 for SDSU, 61 for ISU..less football | | Originally Posted by JonDMiller and that is a bad thing.
I think I am going to really hate the rule change regarding the clock by the end of the year. Amen!
I always hate these rule changes that are designed to speed up the game. I love football! Why shorten it? These NCAA execs need to quit trying to squeeze an extra few minutes of advertising revenue out, and just let college football play the way it is supposed to.
More football would be better! Not less.
| | |
| |
08-29-2008, 11:01 AM
|
#17 | | Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 575
Credits: 77,009 Year: 2004 Degree: Trans & Log | Re: Total plays: 62 for SDSU, 61 for ISU..less football | | Originally Posted by Ames no one told me I was dumb. It is just assumed.
|
"No, it's the opposite -- it's like my heart is getting hard." -GOB Bluth |
| |
08-29-2008, 11:02 AM
|
#18 | | Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: hiawatha, ia
Posts: 779
Credits: 913,743 | Re: Total plays: 62 for SDSU, 61 for ISU..less football | |
Plus ISU was not in any hurry, they ran the clock down on almost every play calling audibles. I think GC knew that if they wanted to score 60+ points and embarass SDSU they could. He took the conversative route and ran the ball and ate up the clock.
I would guarentee that there are a lot more plays next week.
| | |
| |
08-29-2008, 11:03 AM
|
#19 | | Hall-Of-Famer
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Altoona, Ia.
Posts: 3,985
Credits: 210,421 NFL: Vikings MLB: Cardinals | Re: Total plays: 62 for SDSU, 61 for ISU..less football | | Originally Posted by CloneIce Amen!
I always hate these rule changes that are designed to speed up the game. I love football! Why shorten it? These NCAA execs need to quit trying to squeeze an extra few minutes of advertising revenue out, and just let college football play the way it is supposed to.
More football would be better! Not less. If it ain't broken, why fix it? That's what they need to learn.
| | |
| |
08-29-2008, 11:07 AM
|
#20 | | Walk On
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 172
Credits: 810,190 Year: 2003 Degree: B.S. in Mech. E. MLB: Cardinals | Re: Total plays: 62 for SDSU, 61 for ISU..less football | |
If you wanna speed up the game, then get rid of the TV timeouts... but we all know there is no way that is ever going to happen.
| | |
| |
08-29-2008, 12:17 PM
|
#21 | | Bench Warmer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 255
Credits: 816,679 | Re: Total plays: 62 for SDSU, 61 for ISU..less football | | Originally Posted by CloneIce I always hate these rule changes that are designed to speed up the game. I love football! Why shorten it? See Major League Baseball.
|
May my postings be polite and not misunderstood. (And hopefully funny on occasion.)
|
| |
 | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.