Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39
  1. #31
    Legend
    Points: 140,811, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    cybsball20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    12,382
    Points
    140,811
    Level
    100

    Re: Officiating Blunder at end of CU game

    Quote Originally Posted by mwitt View Post
    The referees botched a pretty bad intentional grounding that would have been on CU earlier in the game, too. Not a good officiated game, but it didn't cost us a win.

    Very true, that was a BRUTAL non call...

    Follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/MarkHanrahan20

    Check out my blog
    http://markhanrahan.com

    and tune into "Extra Innings" Thursdays at 6pm on 1460kxno

  2. #32
    Legend Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    DaddyMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    14,375

    Re: Officiating Blunder at end of CU game

    In fact, unless I missed something that was a TEXTBOOK PI call.

    I have no idea what they could've seen that made that play legal.

    BTW - I HATE the out of the pocket, non-PI rule.

  3. #33
    All-Star
    Points: 19,391, Level: 42
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 459
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Quad Cities
    Posts
    1,256
    Points
    19,391
    Level
    42

    Re: Officiating Blunder at end of CU game

    Our defense problem is not enough B12 quality players. The first group and part of the second are there but we need more. We can't spell our guys during the game and they are gassed by the end. If GC keeps getting quality recruits this problem will fix itself and Bolt will look like a genius. If not, he will be CF fodder!

  4. #34
    Starter
    Points: 10,604, Level: 31
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 646
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran10000 Experience Points
    Benny34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    732
    Points
    10,604
    Level
    31

    Re: Officiating Blunder at end of CU game

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    Our defense problem is not enough B12 quality players. The first group and part of the second are there but we need more. We can't spell our guys during the game and they are gassed by the end. If GC keeps getting quality recruits this problem will fix itself and Bolt will look like a genius. If not, he will be CF fodder!

  5. #35
    Speechless
    Points: 425,510, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    jdoggivjc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sterling Heights, MI
    Posts
    28,533
    Points
    425,510
    Level
    100

    Re: Officiating Blunder at end of CU game

    Personally, that last play of the game I really thought MacF was getting WAY too cute. There are certain times in the game when running a cutesy play like the option is acceptable - on the half yard line with three seconds to go is not one of those times. Way too many things can, and did, go wrong. Why not count on the offensive line to get one yard and sneak Arnaud? Or, if you're afraid of Arnaud getting hurt, why not blast it inside with Scales? Or, if you HAD to take it outside, why not fake the handoff to Scales and roll Arnaud out? At least then you'd be drawing the defenders into the offensive line.

    I think it's time that Arnaud be allowed to audible at the line of scrimmage. He had to be thinking "Wow, they've overloaded the right side, this option play ain't gonna work (turns to look at the sidelines) WHAT? They're not changing the play? WTF?"

    I'm not usually one to question the playcalling decisions of coaches, because they've spent years perfecting their craft and are getting paid a hell of a lot more than I to do it. But that was so obviously the WRONG call.

    I haven't lost faith in Chizik yet - way too early for that. But I am losing faith in MacF. Granted, not all of the pieces are there yet, but playcalling has been atrocious at times. Too early for me to make a sane call on Bolt right now - he has way too many holes in the lineup.
    Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice?
    Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.



  6. #36
    Starter
    Points: 18,081, Level: 41
    Level completed: 4%, Points required for next Level: 869
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran10000 Experience Points
    bufante's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    DMI
    Posts
    942
    Points
    18,081
    Level
    41

    Re: Officiating Blunder at end of CU game

    Anyone wonder why we didn't get a first down just a few seconds earlier? Or even that we didn't have that play reviewed? We had to burn a timeout that we otherwise would not have had to do. That hurt a lot.

    Either way, I think when you have 1 play to run, to get about a yard, you run your best play (statistically) that you can. I am willing to bet the option is not one of our top plays.

    Oh well, I did like the tight end play in that drive, took a while to develop, but looked great.
    I love me some Jethros BBQ!
    Twitter: bufantes

  7. #37
    Legend Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    DaddyMac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    14,375

    Re: Officiating Blunder at end of CU game

    Quote Originally Posted by bufante View Post
    Anyone wonder why we didn't get a first down just a few seconds earlier? Or even that we didn't have that play reviewed? We had to burn a timeout that we otherwise would not have had to do. That hurt a lot.
    It appeared to be close enough to warrant a measurement.

    However the play that baffles me a bit more is our second timeout with 0:40 to go. ARob had just rattled off a 27 yard rush for a 1st down. And we burn a TO? The clock stops with the 1st down. We can't get up there and run a legit play from the CU 14?

    Seemed like a waste of TO to me.

    Could have used that TO after the Darks reception. Probably had time to run two plays and take our time in doing so.

  8. #38
    Rookie
    Points: 11,751, Level: 32
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 199
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsCreated Album pictures
    RotatingColumn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sioux City
    Posts
    461
    Points
    11,751
    Level
    32

    Re: Officiating Blunder at end of CU game

    The last time I saw a call like that..? .. 2002 Florida State game, option right called by non other than STEVE Fricken BRICKEY.

    that's all I have to say.. movin on.

  9. #39
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 56,380, Level: 73
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 670
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    WalkingCY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    4,463
    Points
    56,380
    Level
    73

    Re: Officiating Blunder at end of CU game

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
    Personally, that last play of the game I really thought MacF was getting WAY too cute. There are certain times in the game when running a cutesy play like the option is acceptable - on the half yard line with three seconds to go is not one of those times. Way too many things can, and did, go wrong. Why not count on the offensive line to get one yard and sneak Arnaud? Or, if you're afraid of Arnaud getting hurt, why not blast it inside with Scales? Or, if you HAD to take it outside, why not fake the handoff to Scales and roll Arnaud out? At least then you'd be drawing the defenders into the offensive line.

    I think it's time that Arnaud be allowed to audible at the line of scrimmage. He had to be thinking "Wow, they've overloaded the right side, this option play ain't gonna work (turns to look at the sidelines) WHAT? They're not changing the play? WTF?"

    I'm not usually one to question the playcalling decisions of coaches, because they've spent years perfecting their craft and are getting paid a hell of a lot more than I to do it. But that was so obviously the WRONG call.

    I haven't lost faith in Chizik yet - way too early for that. But I am losing faith in MacF. Granted, not all of the pieces are there yet, but playcalling has been atrocious at times. Too early for me to make a sane call on Bolt right now - he has way too many holes in the lineup.
    agree totally here.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19