-
Re: Which is going to be better?
 Originally Posted by CyValley Seems as though Coach Rhoads has been reading your mind . . . or maybe you've been reading his?!
Maybe I'll be attacked for admitting this prejudice (and maybe I should be) . . . but so far, the staff is variiously experienced, young (Bliel is 49, the oldest so far, I think), and fit. I dislike seeing overweight coaches on the field, seems like it reveals a lack of self-discipline, and football is a game of discipline.
This staff is lookin' good (double meaning intended).
(I loath childish namecalling. Those here who immaturely label the overweight say more about themselves than they say about the target of their infantile remarks.) I love your avatar. Seriously.
Seems like the right time for some positive vibes heading into the new year.
-
Re: Which is going to be better?
 Originally Posted by Wesley You can never aniticipate when you might be Chizzed. Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gldlyTjXk9A]YouTube - Spanish inquisition[/ame]
"Dog Eat Dog"
Read the news
Someone win,
Someone lose -
Re: Which is going to be better?
Surprised Walt Harris hasn't been a name that has been circulated. As far as I know, he hasn't coached since being let go at Stanford. He was a solid offensive coordinator under Johnny Majors in the 80's while at Tennessee. He has also coached some pretty talented receivers when he was at Pitt (Larry Fitzgerald and Antonio Bryant).
Also, Shane Montgomery would be another name to throw around as Offensive Coordinator. He was the former coach at Miami (OH) and was recently let go from that position. He is a possible candidate because taking the OC spot at ISU would actually pay him more than what he was making as HC in Oxford. He was the quarterbacks coach/offensive coordinator when Big Ben was there along with the prolific offenses under mobile QB Josh Betts.
Tony Alford at Louisville may get a look. He has been a running backs coach for 13 years and his record speaks for itself. Coached at ISU in two different tenures.
The most exciting pick for me would be Tony Franklin. I don't care that he got canned halfway through his first full year at Auburn. The guy is an offensive genius. Auburn's best option at QB was a Juco transfer that didn't have a clue how to run the offense. He is going to put points up on the board, especially since the talent at ISU is in place (mobile qb-Arnaud, Tiller; WR options-Johnson, Darks, Hamilton, Jones, Carlson, etc.; balanced backfield-Robinson/Williams, Schwartz
-
Re: Which is going to be better?
 Originally Posted by cyco2000 I love your avatar. Seriously. I really appreciate that, cyco2000. A painting loaded with meaning, I agree. Thank God there are some here who understand and value critical moments in time.
Although, just this minute I was just going to replace it with my good pal, The Cat. . . ;-)
Last edited by CyValley; 12-31-2008 at 12:53 PM.
-
Re: Which is going to be better?
I'm ecstatic with our hires thusfar.. Great recruiters/coaching experience/Iowa ties/ISU coaching ties/etc... Although we have yet to see who our OC/DC will be, which will make or break the staff(obviously).. To all the pessimists, why AREN'T you happy with the hires thusfar??? I'm pretty tired of the posters on most of these coaching threads throwing out one-liners expressing their displeasure of our recent hires.. Would any of you like to explain WHY you don't like the hires??
Last edited by Drizzle; 12-31-2008 at 01:12 PM.
-
Re: Which is going to be better?
 Originally Posted by Drizzle I'm ecstatic with our hires thusfar.. Great recruiters/coaching experience/Iowa ties/ISU coaching ties/etc... Although we have yet to see who our OC/DC will be, which will make or break the staff(obviously).. To all the pessimists, why AREN'T you happy with the hires thusfar??? I'm pretty tired of many posters on here throwing out one-liners expressing their displeasure of our recent hires.. Would any of you like to explain WHY you don't like the hires?? As long as we win games, I don't care if Walden, Criner, Duncan, and McCarney are walking the sidelines.
-
Re: Which is going to be better?
 Originally Posted by CyValley I really appreciate that, cyco2000. A painting loaded with meaning, I agree. Thank God there are some here who understand and value critical moments in time.
Although, just this minute I was just going to replace it with my good pal, The Cat. . . ;-) I would echo cyco's comment. Very neat avatar. I assume that is Washington at Valley Forge??? Believe it or not, I was just telling my wife I would like a print of The Prayer at Valley Forge for my office. It's a very serene yet powerful painting. Obviously a VERY critical moment for the Continental Army early in the war. -
Re: Which is going to be better?
 Originally Posted by cyco2000 As long as we win games, I don't care if Walden, Criner, Duncan, and McCarney are walking the sidelines. Grate er Great Post Cyco...I got a chuckle when I read your post..My sentiments are the same...I dont care who walks the sideline as long as ISU WINS!!!!!!!!!!!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks