-
Re: yet another commitment
 Originally Posted by 2forISU This means someone is leaving ISU or someone is moving to another position. Totally disagree..... Depth at this position with a fast moving offense that Herman will put in will probably be more benefitial.
-
Re: yet another commitment
 Originally Posted by 2forISU This means someone is leaving ISU or someone is moving to another position. This means we have an OC who likes to put lots of receivers on the field. It does seem like overkill, but if anyone leaves, I'd think it would be a RB first, sadly.
-
Re: yet another commitment
16 wide receivers will be on the roster next year..really need that many?
-
Re: yet another commitment
 Originally Posted by 2forISU 16 wide receivers will be on the roster next year..really need that many? some aren;t scholly wideouts or mainly scout team guys.
NHL teams need to be added to the favorite teams section. -
Re: yet another commitment
 Originally Posted by 2forISU 16 wide receivers will be on the roster next year..really need that many? It does sound like a bit much but keep in mind the type of offense that Herman ran at Rice. I'm sure a couple of the receivers will redshirt but it is good to have depth at this position and will be huge in our new explosive offense.
-
Re: yet another commitment
So basically 28% of our team is made up of receivers.
-
Re: yet another commitment
This recruting season isn't even over. We could have 16+ receiver by the end of the recruting periods. Texas Tech doesn't even have that.
-
Re: yet another commitment
 Originally Posted by 2forISU This recruting season isn't even over. We could have 16+ receiver by the end of the recruting periods. Texas Tech doesn't even have that. Oh come on guys... You and I both know they'll convert many to other positions.
-
Re: yet another commitment
 Originally Posted by 2forISU So basically 28% of our team is made up of receivers. Well, we only have 10 returning receivers:
Hunter, Campbell, Carlson, Darks, Johnson, Mitchell, Mulcahey, Range, Sandvig, and Williams.
And we only have 3 WR recruits already:
Money Reynolds, Josh Lenz, and DJ Beshears.
So another committ would bring our number of wide receivers to 14. Considering the 85 scholarship limit as our "team", only 16% of the team will be receivers.
Gene Smith, 1993-2000. 7 years, 6 NCAA's, 1 bowl game. Revenue sports postseason participation 50%. Good. Bruce Vandevelde, 2000-20005. 5 years, 4 bowl games, 2 NCAA's, 2 NIT's. Postseason participation 80%. Better. Jamie Pollard, 2005-. 4 years. 1 bowl game, 0 NCAA's, 0 NIT's. Postseason participation: 13%. The next big step. My ignore list: splitidentity, tarheelhawk,superdorf, clones_jer. That is all. -
Re: yet another commitment
I thought there was 60. My math would be incorrect then. Houston Jones, Joel Zitek and Hunter Burke
-
Re: yet another commitment
-
Re: yet another commitment
no such thing as too many play makers.... our defense is still going to be bad so why not improve the offense as much as we possibly can.
-
Re: yet another commitment
 Originally Posted by 2forISU This recruting season isn't even over. We could have 16+ receiver by the end of the recruting periods. Texas Tech doesn't even have that.
Tech had 16 receivers on their roster this year.
-
Re: yet another commitment
Cannot wait to see what this offense can do!
-
Re: yet another commitment
 Originally Posted by isucyclone4 Cannot wait to see what this offense can do! im betting on 40 points a game... question is how much do we give up
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks