-
06-10-2009, 03:27 PM #166
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
 Originally Posted by ClimbIowa Nicely written post, but I wasn't defending Iowa. I expect that a lot of writers think Iowa will be worse based on Greene. This guy completely glossed over King/Kroul for goodness sakes. I tried to actually answer the question. If it makes you feel better to blame me and buddy up with your Clone brethren, go for it. But my intentions had nothing to do with defending the Hawks. It seems pretty clear that the writer doesn't think much of Iowa this year. Right. Sorry, not buying it. You came out attacking ISU's schedule. Why? Just because one Cyclone fan had said they would rather have another school's schedule than have Kent State on the road? Sorry, I just can't accept that would draw an Iowa fan such as yourself into the discussion. Now, the earlier post that mentioned that the writer must not have thought much of Iowa........I could see where that might draw you out, and thus you attack ISU's schedule. Why attack ISU's schedule? Most fans know it is weak, although for a 2 and 10 team it looks tough enough. After ISU's experience with teams like Toledo, UNLV, UNI and others over the last few years, most any schedule looks tough. Just not sure why you had to jump into the thread, except for the fact that the writer had mentioned Iowa in the blog, and one Cyclone fan had mentioned Iowa in their post.
-
06-10-2009, 03:30 PM #167
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
 Originally Posted by DaddyMac and Army... and that "division II" school
Be an adult and tell it like it is - you're just taking a shot at ISU's schedule on the whole. It has nothing to do with any one team - as evidenced by your initial post.
You can throw all about what I said about KS and NU's home slate. But it doesn't change what you said.
This is correct. We have a troll in our midst.
RIP Janice
b. April 2012 d. April 2012
9 posts
May perpetual light shine upon him. -
06-10-2009, 03:33 PM #168
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
 Originally Posted by Dryburn Right. Sorry, not buying it. You came out attacking ISU's schedule. Why? Just because one Cyclone fan had said they would rather have another school's schedule than have Kent State on the road? Sorry, I just can't accept that would draw an Iowa fan such as yourself into the discussion. Now, the earlier post that mentioned that the writer must not have thought much of Iowa........I could see where that might draw you out, and thus you attack ISU's schedule. Why attack ISU's schedule? Most fans know it is weak, although for a 2 and 10 team it looks tough enough. After ISU's experience with teams like Toledo, UNLV, UNI and others over the last few years, most any schedule looks tough. Just not sure why you had to jump into the thread, except for the fact that the writer had mentioned Iowa in the blog, and one Cyclone fan had mentioned Iowa in their post. I made a similar post ripping Kent State in another thread just moments before this one. This thread popped up and it was right on topic so I posted. So good try, but get a few more facts next time. Of course, I'm sure you'll still believe you're right. So be it.
-
06-10-2009, 03:34 PM #169
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
 Originally Posted by Dryburn Right. Sorry, not buying it. You came out attacking ISU's schedule. Why? Just because one Cyclone fan had said they would rather have another school's schedule than have Kent State on the road? Sorry, I just can't accept that would draw an Iowa fan such as yourself into the discussion. Now, the earlier post that mentioned that the writer must not have thought much of Iowa........I could see where that might draw you out, and thus you attack ISU's schedule. Why attack ISU's schedule? Most fans know it is weak, although for a 2 and 10 team it looks tough enough. After ISU's experience with teams like Toledo, UNLV, UNI and others over the last few years, most any schedule looks tough. Just not sure why you had to jump into the thread, except for the fact that the writer had mentioned Iowa in the blog, and one Cyclone fan had mentioned Iowa in their post. Well stated.
Except that nobody said a peep about iowa til this joker jumped in. All that was said was by Lebron that ISU has a chance to go 4-0 after being 2-10 last season. Which is nothing more than the truth.
-
06-10-2009, 03:35 PM #170
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
 Originally Posted by ClimbIowa I made a similar post ripping Kent State in another thread just moments before this one. This thread popped up and it was right on topic so I posted. So good try, but get a few more facts next time. Of course, I'm sure you'll still believe you're right. So be it. Try posting in the correct thread next time.
-
06-10-2009, 03:39 PM #171
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
 Originally Posted by weR138 This is correct. We have a troll in our midst. Nope. I'm amazed at the amount of bitterness coming from you guys, but that's a different topic.
I said Kent State sucks. They do. I'd chalk all the angry responses up to venting, but there's more to it. Kent State has sucked the last two years. It's obvious to everyone. But you won't find many Clone fans in this thread agreeing with that simple point. Iowa's schedule always has some junk teams too. That's college football, but Clone fans are fighting tooth and nail to get away from the point that 7 wins in two years by a MAC team indicates a bad team (even if they play ISU tough).
-
06-10-2009, 03:42 PM #172
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
 Originally Posted by ClimbIowa Nope. I'm amazed at the amount of bitterness coming from you guys, but that's a different topic.
I said Kent State sucks. They do. I'd chalk all the angry responses up to venting, but there's more to it. Kent State has sucked the last two years. It's obvious to everyone. But you won't find many Clone fans in this thread agreeing with that simple point. Iowa's schedule always has some junk teams too. That's college football, but Clone fans are fighting tooth and nail to get away from the point that 7 wins in two years by a MAC team indicates a bad team (even if they play ISU tough). ???  EVERYBODY THINKS KENT STATE SUCKS!!! WE DON'T TALK ABOUT IT BECAUSE EVERYONE HAS CONCEDED THAT POINT!!! IN FACT, THE ONLY PERSON THAT SEEMS TO THINK THAT IOWA STATE FANS DON'T THINK KENT STATE SUCKS IS...
...WAIT FOR IT...
YOU!!! Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice? Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.  -
06-10-2009, 03:43 PM #173
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
[QUOTE=DaddyMac;1093033]and Army... and that "division II" school
Be an adult and tell it like it is - you're just taking a shot at ISU's schedule on the whole. It has nothing to do with any one team - as evidenced by your initial post.
This is troll talk CI. You came to do one thing, run down ISU football.
RIP Janice
b. April 2012 d. April 2012
9 posts
May perpetual light shine upon him. -
06-10-2009, 03:43 PM #174
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
 Originally Posted by ClimbIowa Nope. I'm amazed at the amount of bitterness coming from you guys, but that's a different topic.
I said Kent State sucks. They do. I'd chalk all the angry responses up to venting, but there's more to it. Kent State has sucked the last two years. It's obvious to everyone. But you won't find many Clone fans in this thread agreeing with that simple point. Iowa's schedule always has some junk teams too. That's college football, but Clone fans are fighting tooth and nail to get away from the point that 7 wins in two years by a MAC team indicates a bad team (even if they play ISU tough). WOW!
I'm pretty sure I've seen nary a single Cyclone poster who's DENIED that fact.
What I do see is a hawk troll getting his jollies off whilst making himself out to be an arse.
My suggestion is the mods shut this one down - the OP can try again and perhaps we can get through it without such trollish behavior (doubtful)  Originally Posted by ClimbIowa I said Kent State sucks. And Army, and "that division II school". You keep avoiding this fact, which speaks to your intentions.
Last edited by DaddyMac; 06-10-2009 at 03:46 PM.
-
06-10-2009, 03:48 PM #175
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
[quote=weR138;1093090]  Originally Posted by DaddyMac and Army... and that "division II" school
Be an adult and tell it like it is - you're just taking a shot at ISU's schedule on the whole. It has nothing to do with any one team - as evidenced by your initial post.
This is troll talk CI. You came to do one thing, run down ISU football. No. I've "told it like it is". I came to insult Kent State and by proxy anyone that thinks Kent State is a decent team. Since none of you have believe Kent State is decent (even after the loss at the beginning of Chiz's tenure ) I don't see what the uproar is about.
I cheer against ISU football once a year. I prefer watching ISU basketball. I've got nothing against ISU. Granted, the people on this site are trying to change that opinion, but I know too many good Clone fans to let you fellas tarnish my opinion of the institution.
-
06-10-2009, 03:50 PM #176
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
[quote=ClimbIowa;1093103]  Originally Posted by weR138
No. I've "told it like it is". I came to insult Kent State and by proxy anyone that thinks Kent State is a decent team. Since none of you have believe Kent State is decent (even after the loss at the beginning of Chiz's tenure  ) I don't see what the uproar is about.
I cheer against ISU football once a year. I prefer watching ISU basketball. I've got nothing against ISU. Granted, the people on this site are trying to change that opinion, but I know too many good Clone fans to let you fellas tarnish my opinion of the institution. Why the hell would you even come to an Iowa State fan site to insult Kent St? That might be the most ridiculous assertion I have ever heard in my life - going to a rival's fan site to insult a team that they play later that year. That makes about as much sense as Iowa fans thinking they're going to win the national championship every single year...
Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice? Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.  -
06-10-2009, 03:52 PM #177
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
 Originally Posted by DaddyMac WOW!
I'm pretty sure I've seen nary a single Cyclone poster who's DENIED that fact.
What I do see is a hawk troll getting his jollies off whilst making himself out to be an arse.
My suggestion is the mods shut this one down - the OP can try again and perhaps we can get through it without such trollish behavior (doubtful)
And Army, and "that division II school". You keep avoiding this fact, which speaks to your intentions. No. Army and NDS 'sucking' is relevant to the point that ISU's 11th ranking makes sense coming from this writer. He obviously doesn't think Iowa will be that good and since the other three teams are weak opponents, you got placed 11th.
It should be shut down. I got quickly coerced into being a smart-***, but the level of vitriol and personal attacks coming from the Clones in this thread probably should lead to its demise.
-
06-10-2009, 03:52 PM #178
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
[QUOTE=ClimbIowa;1093103][quote=weR138;1093090]
No. I've "told it like it is". I came to insult Kent State and by proxy anyone that thinks Kent State is a decent team. Since none of you have believe Kent State is decent (even after the loss at the beginning of Chiz's tenure ) I don't see what the uproar is about.
I cheer against ISU football once a year. I prefer watching ISU basketball. I've got nothing against ISU. Granted, the people on this site are trying to change that opinion, but I know too many good Clone fans to let you fellas tarnish my opinion of the institution.[/quote]
Which institution?
RIP Janice
b. April 2012 d. April 2012
9 posts
May perpetual light shine upon him. -
06-10-2009, 03:52 PM #179
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
 Originally Posted by DaddyMac WOW!
I'm pretty sure I've seen nary a single Cyclone poster who's DENIED that fact.
What I do see is a hawk troll getting his jollies off whilst making himself out to be an arse.
My suggestion is the mods shut this one down - the OP can try again and perhaps we can get through it without such trollish behavior (doubtful)
And Army, and "that division II school". You keep avoiding this fact, which speaks to your intentions. Why have a mod shut it down when we need a mod to just ban this fruit loop and then we can get it back on topic.
-
06-10-2009, 03:53 PM #180
Re: ESPN blog ranks ISU's non-con 11th toughest in B12
[quote=jdoggivjc;1093105]  Originally Posted by ClimbIowa
Why the hell would you even come to an Iowa State fan site to insult Kent St? That might be the most ridiculous assertion I have ever heard in my life - going to a rival's fan site to insult a team that they play later that year. That makes about as much sense as Iowa fans thinking they're going to win the national championship every single year... You're not reading my posts (just like the first page). I've answered that question and many relevant tangents.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks