Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 94
  1. #61
    Speechless
    Points: 444,830, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    Al_4_State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Driftless Region
    Posts
    17,627
    Points
    444,830
    Level
    100

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Iowa at 17th is an absolute joke. Every time CFN "opens their mouth" they lose another shred of credibility...
    In 1984, I was hospitalized for approaching perfection.

  2. #62
    Pro
    Points: 39,422, Level: 61
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 928
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Cyrocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,876
    Points
    39,422
    Level
    61

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Quote Originally Posted by TarHeelHawk View Post
    I'd like to see the stats for Myers/Reisner compared to whoever it is plays TE for ISU.
    Quote Originally Posted by ajk4st8 View Post
    ISU

    Franklin 26 for 301 and 2 TDs
    Catlett 20 for 230 and 0 TDs


    Iowa

    Myers 34 for 441 and 4TDS
    Reisner 11 for for 200 and 1 TD
    Not really a fair comparison -- apples and oranges here.

    That's because Iowa does a good job of using their tight ends effectively into their offense. Lately, ISU throws the ball to a tight end about as many times as I visit the Hawkeye Nation Web site -- which is hardly ever.

  3. #63
    Pro
    Points: 39,422, Level: 61
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 928
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Cyrocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,876
    Points
    39,422
    Level
    61

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Sorry about my last post. I should have read further down. Better posters than I have made better points -- including TarHeelHawk.

  4. #64
    Recruit
    Points: 5,240, Level: 21
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 310
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    94
    Points
    5,240
    Level
    21

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Quote Originally Posted by Al_4_State View Post
    Iowa at 17th is an absolute joke. Every time CFN "opens their mouth" they lose another shred of credibility...
    It might be a bit inflated, but I'd hardly call it a joke based on some of the stats thrown around on this thread. Did you read it? Count me as another one who didn't realize that ISU was using their tight ends as much. A good tight end who can catch the ball in traffic is worth his weight in gold.

  5. #65
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 72,658, Level: 83
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 492
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    capitalcityguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    4,524
    Points
    72,658
    Level
    83

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    One way to be sure we don't get overlooked in "rankings" in the future.

    WIN SOME DAMN GAMES!!

    You see how well that works for the Hawks. How about we try that strategy for a change instead of bemoaning where they end up in various rankings?

  6. #66
    All-Star
    Points: 46,506, Level: 66
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 444
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Behind you
    Posts
    1,783
    Points
    46,506
    Level
    66

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyrocks View Post
    Not really a fair comparison -- apples and oranges here.

    That's because Iowa does a good job of using their tight ends effectively into their offense. Lately, ISU throws the ball to a tight end about as many times as I visit the Hawkeye Nation Web site -- which is hardly ever.
    Circular argument. If ISU had better TEs, maybe they'd use them more.

  7. #67
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 6,055, Level: 23
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 495
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    agronclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    des moines
    Posts
    345
    Points
    6,055
    Level
    23

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    this is dumb. iowa's offense is horrendous, and has been since the capital one bowl game. isu may lose most games, but they can at least put up 40 or 50 points against a lot of teams. iowa can only score at will against the no name teams they play the 1st couple games a season. as for auburn, "FU** auburn!

  8. #68
    Addict
    Points: 180,406, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    SplitIdentity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    7,467
    Points
    180,406
    Level
    100

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Quote Originally Posted by agronclone View Post
    this is dumb. iowa's offense is horrendous, and has been since the capital one bowl game. isu may lose most games, but they can at least put up 40 or 50 points against a lot of teams. iowa can only score at will against the no name teams they play the 1st couple games a season. as for auburn, "FU** auburn!
    That must be why Iowa averaged more points per game than ISU the last three seasons, right?
    The artist formerly known as SouthernHawk

  9. #69
    Legend
    Points: 151,308, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Aclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Des Moines, Ia.
    Posts
    10,758
    Points
    151,308
    Level
    100

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Quote Originally Posted by SplitIdentity View Post
    That must be why Iowa averaged more points per game than ISU the last three seasons, right?
    No, just that ISU's offense has been worse than horrendous. Duh.




    "Hey! I'm building something here!"
    --unattributed quote



  10. #70
    Addict
    Points: 180,406, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    SplitIdentity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    7,467
    Points
    180,406
    Level
    100

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Quote Originally Posted by Aclone View Post
    No, just that ISU's offense has been worse than horrendous. Duh.
    I was thinking, I wonder if anybody would notice if we just switched the allowed points and the points scored last year. The numbers would be pretty respectable then! :(

    I just purchased my student tickets.
    The artist formerly known as SouthernHawk

  11. #71
    Rookie
    Points: 8,810, Level: 28
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 540
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    372
    Points
    8,810
    Level
    28

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Iowa's O-line is the reason we are rated that high on offense. RB's don't really matter when they aren't getting touched until 5 yards downfield. It's the Freddie Russel effect. 17th does seem pretty high though, I would guess more around the 35 range fits better.

  12. #72
    All-Star
    Points: 26,951, Level: 50
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 599
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    CykoAGR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Waukee, IA
    Posts
    1,407
    Points
    26,951
    Level
    50

    Re: Cyclone offence rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Quote Originally Posted by joefrog View Post
    So Iowa is going to be much better an offense without Shonn Greene? Really? Top 20? Give me a break.

    Iowa's offense will be good for 5 reasons:

    Left Tackle
    Left Guard
    Center
    Right Guard
    Right Tackle


    Put any D1 running back behind that offensive line and he looks as good as Shonn Greene did last year.


    I hate to argue for the Hawks but IMO this is why they are ranked so high.

  13. #73
    Rookie
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    532

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Quote Originally Posted by ajk4st8 View Post
    Returning ISU WR stats

    Darks 49 catches for 477 1 TD
    Jones 32 catches for 384 0 TD
    Hamilton 26 catches for 301 3 TD
    SJ 18 catches for 188 3 TD

    IOWA WRs

    DJK 44 catches for 639 and 3TDs Long 59
    Stross 13 for 109 and 1 TD DID not play in 25% of his teams games
    Sandeman 6 for 76 and 2 TD

    So yeah when you look at it like that..... they dont return much. We did throw the ball 120 times more than Iowa did last yaer. I kept thinking Brodell is back, which made Iowa clearly the leader in returning WRs.
    When you look at career production, Iowa's group of WR/TEs has better production than ISU's WR/TEs. Not that that means much ... however, it is a fact.

  14. #74
    Pro
    Points: 39,422, Level: 61
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 928
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Cyrocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,876
    Points
    39,422
    Level
    61

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Quote Originally Posted by heitclone View Post
    ISU's TEs are a lot more productive than non Clone fans realize.
    Quote Originally Posted by TarHeelHawk View Post
    Thats what I was thinking; those are pretty comparable numbers.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gonzo View Post
    Circular argument. If ISU had better TEs, maybe they'd use them more.
    I said nothing about the quality of players, so there is no need to be insulting. I made the simple observation that ISU doesn't use its tight ends as much as Iowa.

    But as you can see, heitclone AND TarHeelHawk both made good points.

  15. #75
    Rookie
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    532

    Re: Cyclone offense rated behind Iowa, Auburn

    Quote Originally Posted by homerHAWKeye777 View Post
    When you look at career production, Iowa's group of WR/TEs has better production than ISU's WR/TEs. Not that that means much ... however, it is a fact.
    Take a gander at the following career numbers of the "proven" guys from each squad ....

    ISU's WRs/TEs:

    Hamilton (SR) - 77 receptions, 903 yards, 4 TDs
    Jones (SR) - 33 receptions, 390 yards, 0 TDs
    Darks (SO) - 49 receptions, 477 yards, 1 TD
    Johnson (SO) - 18 receptions, 188 yards, 3 TDs
    Franklin (JR) - 15 receptions, 258 yards, 2 TDs
    Catlett (SR) - 41 receptions, 342 yards, 2 TDs
    Reynolds (JR) - nothing yet

    Iowa's WRs/TEs:

    DJK (JR) - 82 receptions, 1121 yards, 5 TDs
    Stross (SR) - 42 receptions, 570 yards, 6 TDs
    Sandeman (JR) - 10 receptions, 131 yards, 2 TDs
    Chaney (JR) - 21 receptions, 229 yards, 1 TD
    McNutt (SO) - 1 reception, 11 yards, 0 TDs
    Moeaki (SR) - 46 receptions, 566 yards, 7 TDs
    Reisner (JR) - 13 receptions, 231 yards, 1 TD
    Davis (TR FR) - nothing yet
    Last edited by homerHAWKeye777; 08-14-2009 at 01:29 PM.

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19