Funny Hawkeye fan comments

**SDClone** · 09-05-2009, 01:13 PM

Paki O'meara is sure tearing up the field today after being benched after the first half. He hasn't done diddly squat!!!

**Clonebydesign** · 09-05-2009, 02:42 PM

I feel sick

**Bipolarcy** · 09-05-2009, 02:49 PM

Originally Posted by Cybyassociation

Both of those statements are about as completely absurd as the original posters Hawk "friends" claims. Paki could easily be #2 on our depth charts. Stanzi would also fight for the starting position. Stanzi is a good quarterback. I dont think he would fit in at all in our system, but he is a good quarterback. I played against Paki in high school and he had crazy break away speed. Granted this is D1 football and not high school, I think Paki will still have some surprising speed. I think that as Cyclones, we are very fortunate for the Hawks to have to running back woes that they have had. I just wish they had some defensive woes, or some offensive line woes to go along with that.

Sorry, but Paki Omeara could not carry Bo Williams' jock strap and Bo is our third string back. I would rather have Beau Blankenship as a starter than Paki Omeara. I would rather have James White as our starter than Paki OMeara. I would rather have Adam Robinson (Iowa's second stringer), than Paki Omeara as a starter. I can't stress this enough. Paki Omeara SUCKS! If you had watched ANY of this game, you would have come to the same conclusion.

**TheGovernator** · 09-05-2009, 02:52 PM

Originally Posted by Bipolarcy

Sorry, but Paki Omeara could not carry Bo Williams' jock strap and Bo is our third string back. I would rather have Beau Blankenship as a starter than Paki Omeara. I would rather have James White as our starter than Paki OMeara. I would rather have Adam Robinson (Iowa's second stringer), than Paki Omeara as a starter. I can't stress this enough. Paki Omeara SUCKS! If you had watched ANY of this game, you would have come to the same conclusion.

I think the original argument was that Iowa's 3rd string RB was better than anyone on ISU's roster. I think that is definitely a possibility. Kirk struggled on the decision on who to redshirt last year; Hampton or Brinson. Brinson was battling an injury, I believe, so he redshirted while Hampton didn't. Brinson has been battling injury this year as well and has missed quite a bit of time. Thus, he is the 3rd string RB. I fully expect him to be #1 by year's end.

**jaretac** · 09-05-2009, 02:54 PM

Originally Posted by TheGovernator

I think the original argument was that Iowa's 3rd string RB was better than anyone on ISU's roster. I think that is definitely a possibility. Kirk struggled on the decision on who to redshirt last year; Hampton or Brinson. Brinson was battling an injury, I believe, so he redshirted while Hampton didn't. Brinson has been battling injury this year as well and has missed quite a bit of time. Thus, he is the 3rd string RB. I fully expect him to be #1 by year's end.

Did we just watch the same game?

**agcy68** · 09-05-2009, 02:54 PM

From R. Peterson's blog at the Register: "There’s even some booing among the alleged 70,585 at the stadium." That didn't take long...

**Psyclone Brian** · 09-05-2009, 02:59 PM

who's Paki O'meara? ...did he play today?

**CB21** · 09-05-2009, 03:06 PM

Originally Posted by TheGovernator

I think the original argument was that Iowa's 3rd string RB was better than anyone on ISU's roster. I think that is definitely a possibility. Kirk struggled on the decision on who to redshirt last year; Hampton or Brinson. Brinson was battling an injury, I believe, so he redshirted while Hampton didn't. Brinson has been battling injury this year as well and has missed quite a bit of time. Thus, he is the 3rd string RB. I fully expect him to be #1 by year's end.

**ISUAlum2002** · 09-05-2009, 03:10 PM

Originally Posted by TheGovernator

I think the original argument was that Iowa's 3rd string RB was better than anyone on ISU's roster. I think that is definitely a possibility. Kirk struggled on the decision on who to redshirt last year; Hampton or Brinson. Brinson was battling an injury, I believe, so he redshirted while Hampton didn't. Brinson has been battling injury this year as well and has missed quite a bit of time. Thus, he is the 3rd string RB. I fully expect him to be #1 by year's end.

lulz. Maybe this really IS Tommy in Des Moines. So the perpetually injured running back who hasn't played is better than anyone on ISU's roster? Wow.

**BooneCy** · 09-05-2009, 03:25 PM

Originally Posted by baller1

6. Ricky Stanzi is the best quarterback in the Big 10 and Big 12 and is just a notch below Tebow after this season.

Ricki Stanzi almost as good as Jesus? I don't know maybe he spent 5-10 minutes with him this summer and was better for it.

**TheGovernator** · 09-05-2009, 03:41 PM

Originally Posted by ISUAlum2002

lulz. Maybe this really IS Tommy in Des Moines. So the perpetually injured running back who hasn't played is better than anyone on ISU's roster? Wow.

Well ISU had a handful of better RB's that were better than Greene last year, no? The coaches were raving about Brinson, and even the Iowa defense said this guy was a handful. I think I'll take their opinon a little more seriously than someone who starts a post with "lulz" and has no idea a RB named Brinson even existed.

Originally Posted by jaretac

Did we just watch the same game?

I have no idea what you are talking about. The post you quoted had nothing to do with today's game.

**ISUAlum2002** · 09-05-2009, 03:43 PM

Originally Posted by TheGovernator

Well ISU had a handful of better RB's that were better than Greene last year, no?

What does last year have to do with anything?

I think I'll take their opinon a little more seriously than someone who starts a post with "lulz" and has no idea a RB named Brinson even existed.

I was and am quite aware of who Brinson is and what position he plays, thanks.

**jumbopackage** · 09-05-2009, 03:48 PM

Originally Posted by swammi

Last time Iowa had a great team, the were CO-champions. What is that? It means NO champion unless those two teams decide it on the field. I think the NCAA should take another look at this. If I understand it correctly, the NCAA will not sanction a championship game in a conference with 11 teams. I really believe that a conference without a championship game should be allowed only 1 BCS bowl game per year.

The NCAA does not sanction conference championships. Nor do they have any real say or involvement in the BCS. It is entirely the choice of the conferences as to how they want to decide their conference champion.

**TheGovernator** · 09-05-2009, 03:54 PM

Originally Posted by ISUAlum2002

What does last year have to do with anything?

I was and am quite aware of who Brinson is and what position he plays, thanks.

Must not understand his talent and the reason he was listed as the 3rd string guy going into the game today then. I'd almost put a wager on him being THE guy by the end of the season, but who knows if his injury will linger.

**Wx4Cy** · 09-05-2009, 06:04 PM

Originally Posted by TheGovernator

I think the original argument was that Iowa's 3rd string RB was better than anyone on ISU's roster. I think that is definitely a possibility.

Arguably one of the dumbest things I think I've ever heard. Go ahead, be a fan of your team but don't be ignorant about it. Do you realize that ISU's 3rd-string back was one of the most highly recruited RBs in the country coming out of HS? Oh wait, Florida is known for getting those poor recruits that couldn't play for UI.