Stat comparison ISU/Baylor

**jaretac** · 10-13-2009, 01:13 AM

Statistically, Baylor sucks! Total defense is about the same for the two teams (slightly in favor of Baylor), however, total offense is definitely in ISU's favor. ISU is also better at converting on offense and holding on defense.

Offense...............................................Defense
ISU....................................................Baylor
209 YPG.Rushing Offense...............Rushing Defense.171 YPG
191 YPG.Passing Offense...............Passing Defense.210 YPG
401 YPG.Total Offense...................Total Defense.381 YPG
26.8 PPG.Scoring Offense.............Scoring Defense.22.4 PPG
5.8 YPR.Punt return.............Punt return coverage.20.7 YPR
20.6 YPR.Kick return............Kick return coverage.22.6 YPR
6.Passes intercepted..........................Interceptions.7
8.Fumbles lost............................Fumbles recovered.4
14.Total turnovers lost..........Total turnovers recovered.11
115.9.Pass efficiency...........Pass efficiency defense.105.9
2.Sacks allowed.......................................Sacks.9
25.Tackles for loss allowed................Tackle for loss.23
40%.3rd-down conversion.......3rd-down conversion defense.41%
60%.4th-down conversion.......4th-down conversion defense.50%
90%.Red-zone offense.....................Red-zone defense.81%
20.2.1st-down offense...................1st-down defense.22.2

Offense...............................................Defense
Baylor....................................................ISU
158 YPG.Rushing Offense...............Rushing Defense.149 YPG
210 YPG.Passing Offense...............Passing Defense.241 YPG
368 YPG.Total Offense...................Total Defense.390 YPG
30.4 PPG.Scoring Offense.............Scoring Defense.23.5 PPG
8.7 YPR.Punt return..............Punt return coverage.1.2 YPR
25 YPR.Kick return..............Kick return coverage.17.9 YPR
3.Passes intercepted..........................Interceptions.7
5.Fumbles lost............................Fumbles recovered.6
8.Total turnovers lost...........Total turnovers recovered.13
134.2.Pass efficiency...........Pass efficiency defense.141.1
9.Sacks allowed.......................................Sacks.9
25.Tackles for loss allowed................Tackle for loss.31
34%.3rd-down conversion.......3rd-down conversion defense.37%
43%.4th-down conversion......4th-down conversion defense.100%
75%.Red-zone offense.....................Red-zone defense.73%
17.1st-down offense.....................1st-down defense.20.5

**sclotz** · 10-13-2009, 07:56 AM

Where are the special teams stats? If this is a close game, it may make the difference...

**baylrballa** · 10-13-2009, 10:05 AM

play a real team first please.

**Ciclone** · 10-13-2009, 10:07 AM

Originally Posted by baylrballa

play a real team first please.

We certainly won't this week.

**jaretac** · 10-13-2009, 10:09 AM

Originally Posted by baylrballa

play a real team first please.

Like Iowa or Kansas, who combined is 11-0? Oh, I see, your saying you need to play a real team first.

**baylrballa** · 10-13-2009, 10:09 AM

Originally Posted by Ciclone

We certainly won't this week.

and?

**baylrballa** · 10-13-2009, 10:11 AM

Originally Posted by jaretac

Like Iowa or Kansas, who combined is 11-0? Oh, I see, your saying you need to play a real team first.

Kansas

it's ok though, you played a marginal team, who has also played no one, close.

**benjay** · 10-13-2009, 10:17 AM

We definitely exposed Kansas's defense. I'm not sure they're a top 20 team due to that, but their offense is impressive.

Iowa is a solid football team - of course they also dominated us. Baylor hasn't had a hands down tougher schedule than us though.

**d4nim4l** · 10-13-2009, 10:21 AM

Originally Posted by baylrballa

Kansas

it's ok though, you played a marginal team, who has also played no one, close.

How about that rushing defense of yours against Kent St? At home.

**jaretac** · 10-13-2009, 10:22 AM

Originally Posted by baylrballa

Kansas

it's ok though, you played a marginal team, who has also played no one, close.

Just face it, we have played two team that are still undefeated and are ranked in the top 20. You have only played one team that was even ranked and they are in no way undefeated. Seriouslly, who have you played that is so much better?

**stateofmind** · 10-13-2009, 10:22 AM

Originally Posted by baylrballa

Kansas

it's ok though, you played a marginal team, who has also played no one, close.

BU
WF...great win with Griffin
UConn...tough loss
NWState...stat builder
Kent St...common opponent and win
#20 OU...stat declining game

ISU
NDSU...stat builder for new team
UI...stat killer, horrid game
Kent St...common oppenent and win
Army...stat builder
KSU...horrible game, no crazy stats
KU...stat killer for D and builder for O

All-in-all Balla, stats are fairly in line especially without Griffin. I don't think either team should be calling the kettle black.

**jaretac** · 10-13-2009, 10:38 AM

I will give Baylor credit for beating a decent Wake Forest, but Wake Forest is not Kansas! Wake Forest is a 4-2 team in the ACC Atlantic, one of the weakest divisions in the BCS. UConn isn't any better than Baylor and you just got creamed by a marginal Oklahoma team (if Kansas is marginal than so is Oklahoma since OU is ranked lower). We both played Kent St and ISU played better at Kent St than you did when you had them at home. I'm not saying that ISU has had a super tough schedule, but the facts are the facts, we have played to unbeaten top 20 teams, Baylor can't say that.

**kcclone33** · 10-13-2009, 11:27 AM

Ill add this... A-Rob, about 300 yards against Iowa and KU, combined.

**Bear1979** · 10-13-2009, 02:08 PM

Originally Posted by jaretac

I will give Baylor credit for beating a decent Wake Forest, but Wake Forest is not Kansas! Wake Forest is a 4-2 team in the ACC Atlantic, one of the weakest divisions in the BCS. UConn isn't any better than Baylor and you just got creamed by a marginal Oklahoma team (if Kansas is marginal than so is Oklahoma since OU is ranked lower). We both played Kent St and ISU played better at Kent St than you did when you had them at home. I'm not saying that ISU has had a super tough schedule, but the facts are the facts, we have played to unbeaten top 20 teams, Baylor can't say that.

You and I both know Oklahoma would beat Kansas handily. Wake has 2 FG losses. Kansas toughest competition so far has been Iowa State. A KU vs Wake vegas line would be -3 to -6 tops. How is Kansas a powerhouse with 1 TD wins over Southern Miss and Iowa State? Even if they "theoretically" beat Baylor (and they would easily w/out Griffin)....I'd still say Wake could hang with them.