New Depth Chart Released, 11-2

**2Xclone** · 11-02-2009, 11:40 AM

Interesting to see JS not on the depth chart...is he hurt?

**Ciclone** · 11-02-2009, 11:43 AM

They said Sean Smith came in for Lamaak on the radio.

Originally Posted by bawbie

Does anyone know who came into the game when Lamaak went out injured last week?

According to the participation report in the box score, the only OL that played other than the starters was Kyle Lichtenberg, which was the first game he's played in this year, I'm pretty sure. If that's true, I'm surprised they pulled his redshirt since Baysinger had appeared to done a good job filling in previously.

**WalkingCY** · 11-02-2009, 11:49 AM

Need a major upset at home: Will be great for all of us ISUers to celebrate after a hard fought W over OSU next week.....knowing our squad just put themselves in the bowl eligable category with a first year coach..I think the butt kicking to A&M will get us going again....searching to find a way to win, get hungry again to proove ourselves infront of the home crowd.........let's beat a really good squad at home!!!...... I hope it will be Party time in Ames next weekend!

**tazclone** · 11-02-2009, 11:57 AM

Interesting that Schwartz fell out of the depth chart

**tazclone** · 11-02-2009, 12:01 PM

Originally Posted by pyrocyz

Hopefully, Bo showed that he may just not be a practice player?? There are guys who can tear it up during practice all week but can't show it on the field and then there are guys who just have a second nature when if comes to time on the field. I hope that Bo can come on an be that number 2 back that we need. I love the power of the Schwartz, but break away speed is a must in the spread.

Bo's issues have been picking up the offense, blocking, and holding onto the ball. That is what has kept him off the field.

There is soooooo much more to being a RB than running the ball. Keep in mind if the plays are 50/50 run pass, the RB is doing something other than running at least 50% of the time. People always forget that

**jaretac** · 11-02-2009, 12:01 PM

Originally Posted by WalkingCY

Need a major upset at home: Will be great for all of us ISUers to celebrate after a hard fought W over OSU next week.....knowing our squad just put themselves in the bowl eligable category with a first year coach..I think the butt kicking to A&M will get us going again....searching to find a way to win, get hungry again to proove ourselves infront of the home crowd.........let's beat a really good squad at home!!!...... I hope it will be Party time in Ames next weekend!

This would be a huge win for us. If we win this game, it is possible for us to win out. Colorado at home is about as easy of a game as we are going to get in the Big12. Missouri isn't anything overly special and it should be a close game until late. If we win out, we win the North!

I don't expect to win this game, but I don't expect to lose either, looking forward to it.

**CloneIce** · 11-02-2009, 12:21 PM

Sean Smith came in when Lamaak was hurt. I think he was incorrectly left out of the participation report (they list the other #50, Willie Scott, instead.). Burris of course started.

So does anybody know if Kyle Lichtenberg actually played? Or was this just an error in the participation report? Seems weird they would burn his redshirt, especially when there are other lineman ahead of him on the depth chart.

**Im4State** · 11-02-2009, 12:33 PM

Trust me, it's weird. They did the same for ISU vs. Baylor. They did aired on FSN the week after. I watched the Baylor vs. ISU game (even though i was there).

It is A&M vs. ISU. I'll check the exact time and day and post.

I was hoping prior to the start of the year (especially after the spring game) that Bo & A-Rod would be a two-headed monster. Maybe next year after Bo learns the schemes better so AA doesn't get lit up!

If we can have both RB's producing next year together I think we can challenge the teams like Utah/UT/OU... not saying we'll win, but I think enough progess is happening that we'll be competitive. 4 more years of recruiting should allow Rhoads to really make that next step.

**MartyFine** · 11-02-2009, 12:35 PM

Originally Posted by bawbie

How can they be "replaying" it when they didn't play it to begin with?

Did the same thing with the Baylor game...

**Steve** · 11-02-2009, 12:38 PM

Originally Posted by CloneIce

So does anybody know if Kyle Lichtenberg actually played? Or was this just an error in the participation report? Seems weird they would burn his redshirt, especially when there are other lineman ahead of him on the depth chart.

He was listed by error (later removed) for one of the earlier games so I'm assuming that it's the same issue. More than likely a mistake in reading the number or confusion with a similar looking number.

**spyclone** · 11-02-2009, 01:11 PM

Originally Posted by ChrisMWilliams

Here's the story...

Notes:

- AA is starting...

- Reggie is starting...

I hope he's 100%.

THAT would help.

**CloneIce** · 11-02-2009, 02:20 PM

Originally Posted by Steve

He was listed by error (later removed) for one of the earlier games so I'm assuming that it's the same issue. More than likely a mistake in reading the number or confusion with a similar looking number.

Thanks, that's what I was hoping!

**JRE1975** · 11-02-2009, 02:31 PM

Originally Posted by bawbie

How can they be "replaying" it when they didn't play it to begin with?

At the game we noticed there were cameras all around, long tv timeouts, and everything like it was on TV. I thought it might have been on pay for view down there or something. It seemed like a lot of cameras for just replay.

**ketelmeister** · 11-02-2009, 06:50 PM

In his presser, Rhoads said AA would start, Reggie would play and Bo is the number two RB. His explaination was that Schwartz has not shown the improvement they looked for and Bo is more explosive. As ISU 22 said correctly, Williams has not been up to speed with knowing the offense, and Rhoads eluded to that. I could not tell their were some blown calls from the stands at the A and M game, but ISU 22 was correct on that. I stand corrected.
Ketel

**Rick** · 11-02-2009, 07:04 PM

Originally Posted by ketelmeister

In his presser, Rhoads said AA would start, Reggie would play and Bo is the number two RB. His explaination was that Schwartz has not shown the improvement they looked for and Bo is more explosive. As ISU 22 said correctly, Williams has not been up to speed with knowing the offense, and Rhoads eluded to that. I could not tell their were some blown calls from the stands at the A and M game, but ISU 22 was correct on that. I stand corrected.
Ketel

That is big of you to admit that. There is no doubt you are Bo's biggest supporter and probably want him to play more than he wants to play himself. The announcer's were saying that Bo was missing something and CPR said as much. I hope that litltle glimpse of the field is the flame to ingite his learning fire and he tears it up. ARob and Bo would bring back memories of Hicks/Heywood. That was fun to watch.