Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
  1. #1
    All-Star
    Points: 24,049, Level: 47
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 501
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,809
    Points
    24,049
    Level
    47

    SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    Say hello to watching 2 or 3 loss SEC and Big 10 teams play in the BCS every year because of their massive fanbases' ability to generate money for the bowl games that teams like Stanford and UConn can not.

    Slive: BCS 2-team conference limit reconsidered - College Football - Rivals.com

  2. #2
    Starter
    Points: 14,351, Level: 36
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 499
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    675
    Points
    14,351
    Level
    36

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    I think they need to end automatic qualifiers and pick the best team period.

  3. #3
    All-Star
    Points: 24,049, Level: 47
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 501
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,809
    Points
    24,049
    Level
    47

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    Quote Originally Posted by NebrClone View Post
    I think they need to end automatic qualifiers and pick the best team period.
    SEC will argue their 4th place team with 3 losses is better than a 1 loss 2nd place Pac 12 team.

  4. #4
    Addict
    Points: 177,549, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    jbhtexas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Arlington, TX
    Posts
    9,845
    Points
    177,549
    Level
    100

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    Quote Originally Posted by cyman05 View Post
    Say hello to watching 2 or 3 loss SEC and Big 10 teams play in the BCS every year because of their massive fanbases' ability to generate money for the bowl games that teams like Stanford and UConn can not.

    Slive: BCS 2-team conference limit reconsidered - College Football - Rivals.com
    Of course this was coming...
    "Don't worry Boss...they can't do nothin' 'til they're through sparklin'..."

    Avatar - America's new superhero...Cenex Guy

  5. #5
    All-Star
    Points: 24,049, Level: 47
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 501
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,809
    Points
    24,049
    Level
    47

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    Here are what the 10 BCS spots will look like most years.

    1. SEC
    2. SEC
    3. SEC
    4. Big10
    5. Big10
    6. Big12
    7. Big10 or Big 12
    8. ACC
    9. Pac12
    10.Big Country


    Fanbases from the other conferences just can't compete with the sheer number of fans that the SEC and Big10 bring to the table.

  6. #6
    Legend
    Points: 219,914, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Cyclonestate78's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    10,186
    Points
    219,914
    Level
    100

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    It's always something with these freaking guys. Seriously.... let's rewrite conference ties so we can add some schools and renegotiate our tv contracts to get more money. Let's rewrite the BCS rules so we can get more teams into the BCS and make more money. What will it be next? Ban independent schools from the BCS to force Notre Dame into a conference so that conference can make more money? These idiots are ruining college football!!!!!!!

  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 376,469, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    alarson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    18,750
    Points
    376,469
    Level
    100

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    Maybe they shouldve taken the 2 team limit into account before expanding. Split and go back to conferences of 8-10 if you want to maximize BCS opportunities.

  8. #8
    All-Star
    Points: 24,049, Level: 47
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 501
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,809
    Points
    24,049
    Level
    47

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    I think the reasons for SEC expansion are multi-faceted

    1. Rip up existing TV contracts to renegotiate for more $$$
    2. Get more teams into BCS for more $$$
    3. Get into Texas for recruiting
    4. Destroy other conferences (Big East and they assume one day Big 12) to help consolidate number of major conferences to drive up TV rights for more $$$

  9. #9
    Speechless
    Points: 376,469, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    alarson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    18,750
    Points
    376,469
    Level
    100

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    Quote Originally Posted by cyman05 View Post
    Fanbases from the other conferences just can't compete with the sheer number of fans that the SEC and Big10 bring to the table.
    If they do expand beyond the 2 team limit, outside of the 1 auto-qualifier it should have to go purely by BCS ratings and not be up to the bowls which ones get selected, just to prevent crap like this.

    The big 10 this year shouldnt have more than 1 team in the BCS this year, but i'm sure they'll push for it, just like they pushed for a Michigan-OSU rematch a couple years ago.

  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 70,505, Level: 82
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 945
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Incyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,249
    Points
    70,505
    Level
    82

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    Quote Originally Posted by alarson View Post
    If they do expand beyond the 2 team limit, outside of the 1 auto-qualifier it should have to go purely by BCS ratings and not be up to the bowls which ones get selected, just to prevent crap like this.

    The big 10 this year shouldnt have more than 1 team in the BCS this year, but i'm sure they'll push for it, just like they pushed for a Michigan-OSU rematch a couple years ago.
    Largely agree with this. Have your 6 BCS (or 5 depending on Big East) auto-qualifiers and give the remaining spots to the top rated BCS teams.

    Also, bring in the Cotton Bowl and expand the BCS to 12.
    “Science investigates; religion interprets. Science gives man knowledge, which is power; religion gives man wisdom, which is control. Science deals mainly with facts; religion deals mainly with values. The two are not rivals. They are complementary.”

    Martin Luther King Jr.

  11. #11
    All-Star
    Points: 24,049, Level: 47
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 501
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,809
    Points
    24,049
    Level
    47

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    Quote Originally Posted by alarson View Post
    Maybe they shouldve taken the 2 team limit into account before expanding. Split and go back to conferences of 8-10 if you want to maximize BCS opportunities.
    If you have the power of the SEC, you don't expand with the assumption that you're going to play within the rules, but you expand with the assumption that you get to change the rules as you go.

    As long as their #3 team is ranked in the top 14 of the BCS, they will receive an at-large bid every year. They'll probably want to change the rule about being ranked in the top 14 to receive an at-large bid to the top 18 or 20 though.

  12. #12
    Legend
    Points: 219,914, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Cyclonestate78's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    10,186
    Points
    219,914
    Level
    100

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    Quote Originally Posted by alarson View Post
    Maybe they shouldve taken the 2 team limit into account before expanding. Split and go back to conferences of 8-10 if you want to maximize BCS opportunities.
    Exactly. These guys want to play by their own set of rules and if the NCAA rules, BCS rules, or anything else gets in their way they just make up new rules as they go along.


    BREAKING NEWS:

    This just in.... the new interim commissioner of the Big XII conference in an effort to be more competitive against the SEC who has won the last 5 National Championships has petitioned the NCAA to allow only Big XII schools to up their limit of scholarships per year from 85 to 170. Included in the petition to the NCAA was the request that Big XII schools also be allowed to offer recruits signing bonuses not to exceed $20,000 and weekly scholarship bonuses of no more then $1,000 as well as forcing all SEC schools to be required to play a minimum of 2 non conference games per year in the northern states in late November or December. The most controversial request of all was the request that all SEC schools would have any loss count as 2 losses against them to help ensure that a 1 loss SEC team can't buy their way into the National Championship game ever again. At this time the NCAA has had no comment as they are too busy investigating multiple SEC schools for major NCAA violations. Updates to follow.

  13. #13
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 132,867, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    clonedude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,412
    Points
    132,867
    Level
    100

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    Unreal. Some of these conferences are just deadset on ruining college football, aren't they?

    If you want a better chance of getting a BCS bid, then don't expand your conference. Pretty simple.

  14. #14
    Pro
    Points: 47,408, Level: 67
    Level completed: 33%, Points required for next Level: 942
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    bostrem00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,482
    Points
    47,408
    Level
    67

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    The big 10 should never have more than 1 team....look at the all time record of bcs teams....

  15. #15
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 75,997, Level: 85
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 553
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    tm3308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Corydon/Iowa City, IA
    Posts
    3,531
    Points
    75,997
    Level
    85

    Re: SEC to push to end 2 team BCS limit

    I don't like this at all. I do think that the Big East doesn't compete well with the other 5 conferences anymore (particularly if WVU ends up being the SEC's 14th team), but I don't like the idea of letting more than 2 teams from any one conference in.

    It shouldn't be solely based on money. If that's the tie-breaker between two pretty even teams, that's one thing. But that's not what we're talking about here.
    “Hawks tell us we have no future, and we let you know what we think of Hawk fans, which is a lower opinion all the time.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

    “With the exception of tm3308. He is a good contributor on this site. It is almost to the point that I question if he is actually a hawk fan. ” -- Cyclonestate78 7/25/2011

    “He broke the mold. If he wrote the OP, I would have read the whole thing.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437