Gene DeFilippo backpedaled quickly — an old quarterback executing one more scramble — after suggesting last month that one of the most stunning shifts in the recent wave of realignment in college sports had been scripted by ESPN
The Boston College athletics director apologized, saying he'd misspoken when he told The Boston Globe
that the cable television titan "told us what to do" before the Atlantic Coast Conference
chose Pittsburgh and Syracuse as new members, plundering the neighboring Big East.
His retreat did little to quell conspiracy theories. Questions continue to bubble about whether ESPN — the 32-year-old network that has become a defining force in sports and the culture around them — has been a key behind-the-scenes player at a time of high-profile realignment in college sports. Fueled largely by schools seeking more money and security in their conference arrangements, the scramble has touched at least a half-dozen leagues and threatened several traditional For all that ESPN has lent to the growth of major-college athletics — through on-air exposure and with rights-fees payouts that schools have fed into stadium improvements, luxurious locker rooms and huge contracts for top coaches — there's an undercurrent of concern about the influence of the self-proclaimed Worldwide Leader in Sports.
It's not just that its tentacles are everywhere: They're everywhere at once.
As a TV rights holder, ESPN is a business partner to a wide array of conferences and schools (its total college outlay will average more than $700 million annually by next year).
And as a leading broadcast, print and online news outlet, ESPN also reports the news it's often a party to making.
"We've created … I was going to say a blurry line, but I don't think there is any line anymore as to who's in charge," says Andy Geiger
, a former athletics director at Ohio State University
"We're doing business with an entertainment company whose only way of surviving involves the number of eyeballs watching the screen," he says. "That is the driving force in what I see as all the decisions being made."
DeFilippo gave at least momentary voice to suspicions that ESPN, the sole TV rights holder in the ACC
, is nudging realignment in the direction of its choice — a notion ESPN dismisses as myth.
"These (realignment) decisions lie entirely within the conferences and the universities," says Burke Magnus, ESPN's vice president for college sports programming.
"We haven't been advocates of change in this realm because our business interests are best served by stability."
ESPN has, however, been a focus of public discontent in the Big 12, which a year ago saw Colorado defect to the Pac-12 and Nebraska to the Big Ten.
The network's 20-year, $300 million partnership with Texas in The Longhorn Network
(LHN) rankled some of the Big 12's remaining schools, primarily because of ESPN's initial interest in using LHN to carry high school and other games that league rivals considered out of bounds.
The Longhorn Network gave Texas A&M a final excuse to bolt the Big 12, too.
The Aggies are bound for the Southeastern Conference
, effective next year. Big 12 colleague Missouri appears headed down the same path to the SEC.