Advertise Here » Site Navigation | | Home | | 08-09 Football | | 08-09 MBB | | 08-09 WBB | | 08-09 Wrestling | | Site Rules | | Photo Gallery | | Social Groups | | CyBookie | | CF Top Stats |
| | Donate! | | CF Store |
| | Forum Index | | » Forum Menu | | Forum Index | | Front-Page News | | Site News | | Feedback/Support | | Introductions | | CF Tourney Pools | | Betting Board | | Press Releases | | ISU General | | Campus Life | | ISU MBB | | ISU WBB | | ISU Football | | ISU Wrestling | | Big XII | | In-State Rivals | | General College | | Pro Sports | | Off Topic | | Politics/Religion | | Gaming & Groups | | Ticket Exchange | | CF Archive | | Restricted Forums | | | » 2008 Iowa State Football | | ISU vs Kent State: |
 | |
04-21-2008, 05:42 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Lost in La Mancha
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,706
Credits: 9,303 | Re: BCS: Illegal Enterprise? Originally Posted by jdoggivjc Yeah, well I do remember it - ala Georgia they decided to make an example out of hapless Illinois. Now I tend to like Illinois simply because they're one of Iowa's real rivals (not imaginary Michigan/OSU/PSU rivalries that they like to trumpet up), but of course they belonged in the BCS even less than Hawaii did. Really, if they wanted to do it right, they would have done USC-Georgia and Illinois-Hawaii. However, with the Rose Bowl demanding that it stick to its "so-called" tradition... I wish it was Illinois vs. Hawaii, then I probably wouldn't have lost my 700K on the game. I'm going to write my congressman and let them know I'm upset about it too because I lost some Cycredits because of it.
| "If you can't hear me, it's because I'm in parentheses." |
| |
04-22-2008, 09:05 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Pro
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,097
Credits: 13,826 | Re: BCS: Illegal Enterprise? Originally Posted by jdoggivjc Yeah, well I do remember it - ala Georgia they decided to make an example out of hapless Illinois. Now I tend to like Illinois simply because they're one of Iowa's real rivals (not imaginary Michigan/OSU/PSU rivalries that they like to trumpet up), but of course they belonged in the BCS even less than Hawaii did. Really, if they wanted to do it right, they would have done USC-Georgia and Illinois-Hawaii. However, with the Rose Bowl demanding that it stick to its "so-called" tradition... It's not "so-called". They've been inviting Pac-10 teams since the game began in 1916, and the Pac-10/Big-10 tradition has been going since WWII.
The game didn't mean anything anyway, so who cares who goes? It's like arguing over the seeding in the NIT. Let the bowl games keep their tradition. It's one of the many great things about college football.
|
You mean we have unlimited juice?
This party is going to be off....THE HOOK!
|
| |
04-23-2008, 10:26 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Addict
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Eldridge, IA
Posts: 8,078
Credits: 500,276 Year: 2003 NFL: Falcons NBA: Magic MLB: Twins | Re: BCS: Illegal Enterprise? Originally Posted by jumbopackage It's not "so-called". They've been inviting Pac-10 teams since the game began in 1916, and the Pac-10/Big-10 tradition has been going since WWII.
The game didn't mean anything anyway, so who cares who goes? It's like arguing over the seeding in the NIT. Let the bowl games keep their tradition. It's one of the many great things about college football. They didn't seem to care too much about tradition when they sold out to the BCS, only until 2002 when they lost both Iowa and USC to the Orange Bowl. Only up to that point did they start complaining - basically they wanted have their cake and eat it too.
The time the Rose Bowl began caring more about the BCS money was the time I began not giving a rip about their "so-called" tradition.
|
My Roman Villas:
Friley-Godfrey (-66|126)
Helser-Woodrow (-61|122)
Roberts-Harriman (-74|133)
Welch-Ayres (-73|133) |
| |
 | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.