-
Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
ESPN - Loyola (MD) vs. Davidson - Recap - November 25, 2008
The nation's leading scorer, Stephen Curry, was held scoreless against Loyola.
Loyola installed a triangle and 2 defense with both players guarding Curry. He went to the corner and watched his team play 4 on 3 for the entire game. -
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
-
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
I couldn't believe it when I saw it, too bad they got beat by 30
"Profanity is the Crutch of Inarticulate Mother ****ers"
The Wall in the Bathroom at People's -
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
hahahaha wow, dick move on their part but they pulled it off!
-
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
It's stupid because they still let one player beat them...
-
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
I wish Curry could have gotten 1 bucket, just so they didn't have the pride(?) of saying they held him scoreless.
But yeah, Curry still beat them.
-
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
 Originally Posted by tim_redd It's stupid because they still let one player beat them... exactly. perfectly put. I hope Stephen feels good about himself today. Cause he still helped create that win for his team. Points or no points. He should get one big-*** assist. -
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
I'd still love to see one team out there cover everyone but the stud on the floor, maybe minimal pressure to just to prevent driving straight to the hoop on every possession - actually MAKE that stud beat you by scoring all the points.
Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice? Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.  -
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
I bet Curry took pride in actually having 0 points and helping his team win. 2 or 3 points would have ruined it. 
I would literally fire the Loyola coach the next day. 4 on 3 never works. I'd make a point and boot him.
-
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
He was playing for the right to say they held one player scoreless? terrible.
The coach should have made an adjustment after they started getting down. Really I'd be ****** if he were coach of a team I rooted for.
-
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
I can see maybe, maybe, giving it a try...even though it is a bad idea to play a game 3 on 4. But why in the hell would you stick with it after it was clearly not working. I really think he must have just been playing to hold Steph scoreless, and I would want him fired if I were a fan of that team. I mean, if GMac came out and said he wasn't even trying to win a game, but rather was trying to break some record or whatever, I would be so ******.
-
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
Did they win the second half?
-
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
 Originally Posted by tim_redd Did they win the second half? That is the real question! The answer is, no they did not
-
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
thats ridculous... no other teams are gonna try that. davidson has good players other than curry and if you give them a 4-on-3 every time down the court then that is just ridiculous
-
Re: Davidson's Curry held scoreless.
I wouldn't want to play for that coach. He made a silly personal goal bigger than winning the game. I'm sure his AD has taken note of that fact.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks