-
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
 Originally Posted by Melvin Congradulations to the Big 10 for COVERING the Spread. I was impressed by Northwestern, but they were just OVERMATCHED. The Big 10 does not have the Talent that the Big 12 has. End of Discussion!!!!!!!
Although FAT and SLOW, the Big 10 might not be as pathetic as everyone says.
I'm still predicting 0-6 for the WORST CONFERENCE in the COUNTRY.
Melvin - just think if we were in the big 10 this year. We'd be playing on January 1st or later, no doubt. Our offense would have torn up that league and looking at the Big 10 offense, it wouldn't have taken that much of a defense to dominate the league.
-
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
Big 10 Update:
Your next Butt Wiping is Scheduled for Wednesday. Kansas vs Minnesota. This one could get ugly.
Then, Black Thursday. We have you Scheduled for (3) Blood Lettings.
USC / Iowa
Georgia / Mich St
USC / Penn St
-
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
 Originally Posted by Melvin Big 10 Update:
Your next Butt Wiping is Scheduled for Wednesday. Kansas vs Minnesota. This one could get ugly.
Then, Black Thursday. We have you Scheduled for (3) Blood Lettings.
USC / Iowa
Georgia / Mich St
USC / Penn St you sir, are an idiot
-
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
 Originally Posted by Melvin Big 10 Update:
Your next Butt Wiping is Scheduled for Wednesday. Kansas vs Minnesota. This one could get ugly.
Then, Black Thursday. We have you Scheduled for (3) Blood Lettings.
USC / Iowa
Georgia / Mich St
USC / Penn St Melvin, don't make me call your mom and tell her you are still up.
-
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
iowa may just be the only winner from the Big 11 this bowl season. The rest of the teams look outmatched.
XXXX Master Shake is under gag order XXXX -
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
 Originally Posted by bmuff iowa may just be the only winner from the Big 11 this bowl season. The rest of the teams look outmatched. Yeah... NW was, and they almost won. I agree on paper Iowa has the only favorable match up.
-
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
 Originally Posted by CyPride Melvin - just think if we were in the big 10 this year. We'd be playing on January 1st or later, no doubt. Our offense would have torn up that league and looking at the Big 10 offense, it wouldn't have taken that much of a defense to dominate the league. Are you talking about the 2008 ISU FB team. If you are that is crazy talk.
The gap in our economy is between what we have and what we think we ought to have--and that is a moral problem, not an economic one. - Paul Heyne -
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
 Originally Posted by Melvin Common Hawkeye Lovers, Let me hear ya.
The Big 10 is BIG, FAT, AND SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW.
Mizzou played about as bad as you could and the game is TIED. This game is over. MU wins by 21, not the 70 that I predicted, but they still cover. Big 10 Sucks.
Come On Hawks, Take my Bait, Spout off on HOW Northwestern will come back or how the Big 10 isn't that bad.
Yeah you could have a point about big and fat, but I thought that NW looked really fast for a jv team from the little 11!!!
And 4 the record...mizzou wouldnt be worth nuthin without that little peg-leg quarterback from texas(southlake carroll)!!!!
-
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
 Originally Posted by CyBobby Yeah you could have a point about big and fat, but I thought that NW looked really fast for a jv team from the little 11!!!
And 4 the record...mizzou wouldnt be worth nuthin without that little peg-leg quarterback from texas(southlake carroll)!!!! Yeah, he was super impressive.....where do I find that sarcasm pirate?
 Originally Posted by MNCyGuy The only answer to "who/what is GeronimusClone?" is in fact "GeronimousClone". You're like The Todd on Scrubs.  Originally Posted by Angie This is why you're my favorite  Originally Posted by MoreCowbell GC, he's obviously all man. And I don't think Ellen would go *****, even for GC... -
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
 Originally Posted by Melvin Big 10 Update:
Your next Butt Wiping is Scheduled for Wednesday. Kansas vs Minnesota. This one could get ugly.
Then, Black Thursday. We have you Scheduled for (3) Blood Lettings.
USC / Iowa
Georgia / Mich St
USC / Penn St So, Kansas is actually going to wipe Minnesota's ***?
 Originally Posted by MNCyGuy The only answer to "who/what is GeronimusClone?" is in fact "GeronimousClone". You're like The Todd on Scrubs.  Originally Posted by Angie This is why you're my favorite  Originally Posted by MoreCowbell GC, he's obviously all man. And I don't think Ellen would go *****, even for GC... -
Prospect
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
 Originally Posted by Melvin Common Hawkeye Lovers, Let me hear ya.
The Big 10 is BIG, FAT, AND SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW.
Mizzou played about as bad as you could and the game is TIED. This game is over. MU wins by 21, not the 70 that I predicted, but they still cover. Big 10 Sucks.
Come On Hawks, Take my Bait, Spout off on HOW Northwestern will come back or how the Big 10 isn't that bad. Wow nothing like living off of another teams success. I guess that's why your ISU.
-
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
People don't want to hear it, but bowl games are not about who is better. They're about who "wants" to be there. It sucks, it's unfortunate, but it's the system our university president's think is best.
The Big 10 is a victim of amazing bowl tie-ins. It's not their fault It helps them get amazing exposue. Unfortunately (for them), it usually finds them overmatched in bowl games. Once the match-up is locked in, one of two things happens (usually nothing in between)...
1) The underdog rallies the troops, plays the no respect card, and comes out and gives a valiant effort (close win or close loss) to a highly rated team.
2) They get blown out.
Vegas doesn't lie. The only Big 10 team favored is Iowa.
"But, but, but...the Big 10 plays defense!"
I don't think we can even judge the Big 10 on head-head in bowl games (win or lose). Mainly because some teams don't want to be there. You don't wan to hear it, but the only way to judge teams is the "eye ball" test. Watch all year, and make your judgement. I watch the Big 10 (as does most of the media and voters) and don't think they're as talented, fast, and skilled as the Big 12 and SEC. Sounds like a silly way to determine who is good, doesn't it? Funny thing it's exactly how we determine a national championship match-up.
"They'd write things like...Lloyd. See you around....maybe."
--Lloyd Dobler -
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
Kudos to NW coaches and players. They had a better plan and executed MUCH better. They were just a bit short on overall talent. That being said I think Pinkle is a "rich mans" Danny Mac. I think he had better talent than Mac but is not a great coach. I think he overachieved last year and seasons like this year is what Mizzou fans can expect in the future.
-
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
 Originally Posted by h2otower Wow nothing like living off of another teams success. I guess that's why your ISU. And I guess that's why "your" not an English teacher. -
Re: Big 10 Stinks - Northwestern
I don't know if I have ever been more impressed with a young coach than I am with Pat Fitzgerald. What a great coach. Bring a lot of energy to the side line, while at the same time staying under control. He has a bright future
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks