-
Well you guys were right the Big 10......
Blows..............and the Big 12 looks solid. Now being fair I already thought Minne and Wiscy stunk and NW played about how I thought, as I wasn't high on Mizzou. MSU also played waaayyy better than I thought they would, but PSU really disappointed me. USC on the Big stage it seems is just nearly impossible to beat and PSU just wasn't good enough to even make it respectable. Now what I have gleaned from watching football all year is that QB play and strong defense (being able to pressure strong QB’s and tackle in space) is paramount to win in college ball anymore. With strong QB play coming in even above strong D.
The good news is ISU returns a ton of young players and what I think is a pretty darn good QB. Plus they have what appears to be some very exciting young skill guys on the edges and in the D-backfield. And even better……… …..Iowa returns a ton of young talent and a “decent” QB who might get better as a Jr and a very strong D that got quite a bit of experience from the 2nd team D-linemen with one even getting Big 10 POW and a DE in Binns who may be the best pass rusher it seemed.
It will be an exciting competitive game next year in Ames no matter whether we both have new coaches or not.... Chad
Last edited by cmhawks99; 01-02-2009 at 03:42 PM.
-
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
I can live with 1-5 and an Iowa win
what does 6-1 and no ISU bowl game get Isu?
-
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by troyrew I can live with 1-5 and an Iowa win
what does 6-1 and no ISU bowl game get Isu?
lol...you like the Raiders
-
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by cmhawks99 Blows..............and the Big 12 looks solid. Now being fair I already thought Minne and Wiscy stunk and NW played about how I thought, as I wasn't high on Mizzou. MSU also played waaayyy better than I thought they would, but PSU really disappointed me. USC on the Big stage it seems is just nearly impossible to beat and PSU just wasn't good enough to even make it respectable. Now what I have gleaned from watching football all year is that QB play and strong defense (being able to pressure strong QB’s and tackle in space) is paramount to win in college ball anymore. With strong QB play coming in even above strong D.
The good news is ISU returns a ton of young players and what I think is a pretty darn good QB. Plus they have what appears to be some very exciting young skill guys on the edges and in the D-backfield. And even better………  …..Iowa returns a ton of young talent and a “decent” QB who might get better as a Jr and a very strong D that got quite a bit of experience from the 2nd team D-linemen with one even getting Big 10 POW and a DE in Binns who may be the best pass rusher it seemed.
It will be an exciting competitive game next year in Ames no matter whether we both have new coaches or not.... Chad Yeah, and I don't think losing Greene is that big of a hit... Hampton looks like he'll fill in just fine. Heck, maybe it's not the backs but the OL play that needs credit.
As for ISU- some rush ends and immovable DT's should have our athletic young secondary performing just fine. Our WRs look promising- lots of hype around the incoming Reynolds. Tiller vs. Arnaud might be an interesting story this summer. The most interesting Q for me is if/ how Bo Williams fits in w/ the rest of our running back group.
-
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by troyrew I can live with 1-5 and an Iowa win
what does 6-1 and no ISU bowl game get Isu? lol....and the cardinals! -
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by acrozier22 lol....and the cardinals!  The Cardinals have won 10 World Series since the last time the Cubs have even been there.
-
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by cmhawks99 Blows..............and the Big 12 looks solid. Now being fair I already thought Minne and Wiscy stunk and NW played about how I thought, as I wasn't high on Mizzou. MSU also played waaayyy better than I thought they would, but PSU really disappointed me. USC on the Big stage it seems is just nearly impossible to beat and PSU just wasn't good enough to even make it respectable. Now what I have gleaned from watching football all year is that QB play and strong defense (being able to pressure strong QB’s and tackle in space) is paramount to win in college ball anymore. With strong QB play coming in even above strong D.
The good news is ISU returns a ton of young players and what I think is a pretty darn good QB. Plus they have what appears to be some very exciting young skill guys on the edges and in the D-backfield. And even better………  …..Iowa returns a ton of young talent and a “decent” QB who might get better as a Jr and a very strong D that got quite a bit of experience from the 2nd team D-linemen with one even getting Big 10 POW and a DE in Binns who may be the best pass rusher it seemed.
It will be an exciting competitive game next year in Ames no matter whether we both have new coaches or not.... Chad Who are you talking "we"? You are a Hawk fan who went to ISU. There is no "we" for you, unless you are talking about going to the bathroom.
"Dog Eat Dog"
Read the news
Someone win,
Someone lose -
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by joefrog Who are you talking "we"? You are a Hawk fan who went to ISU. There is no "we" for you, unless you are talking about going to the bathroom. I do not believe he meant it as a posessive "we."
-
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by acrozier22 lol....and the cardinals!   Originally Posted by cardinal&gold The Cardinals have won 10 World Series since the last time the Cubs have even been there. A cubs fan making fun of the Cardinals success? FTW the Cards are the 2nd most winning-est team, 2nd only to the evil Yankee empire.
-
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by herbicide A cubs fan making fun of the Cardinals success? FTW the Cards are the 2nd most winning-est team, 2nd only to the evil Yankee empire. #1 is evil, but #2 isn't?! -
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by ISU4ME I do not believe he meant it as a posessive "we." I agree. And I'd love to see some objective commentary/ debate on his objective post... rather than this turn into another "hawks r dumb, Big 10 stinks, go back to your hawk board" thread. Those are getting really old already.
-
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by Palmer lol...you like the Raiders
Don't judge Raiders fans.... were some of the most loyal you will find in sports lol
-
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by ISU4ME I do not believe he meant it as a posessive "we." Ah, so was he using the royal we?
The Dude: We dropped off the damn money...
The Big Lebowski: We?
The Dude: I! The Royal "we"! You know, the editorial..
"Dog Eat Dog"
Read the news
Someone win,
Someone lose -
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by CP44 Don't judge Raiders fans.... were some of the most loyal you will find in sports lol 2nd only to Lions fans. Now where is my paper sack? -
Re: Well youn guys were right the Big 10......
 Originally Posted by CP44 Don't judge Raiders fans.... were some of the most loyal you will find in sports lol iowa state fans have to be up there pretty high
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules | | |
Bookmarks