UNI 79, Pennbrook 44

[Cydkar]

Even after a very short turnaround UNI didn't give them near the beat down we did.

That should be Pembrook...whatever.

[IcSyU]

Pembroke I had to be a jerk about it.

[SeattleClone]

Let's see, we beat them by 52, UNI beat them by 35, so that means we should beat UNI by 17!

[Haverhill]

Let's see, we beat them by 52, UNI beat them by 35, so that means we should beat UNI by 17!

Lets just hope we beat them by 1...

[06Panther]

We don't play the style that would produce 100 points.

[Erik4Cy]

Last years game was really great matchup and enjoyed every second of it but ISU should prolly win this years matchup by 7-12 points.

[Cydkar]

Let's see, we beat them by 52, UNI beat them by 35, so that means we should beat UNI by 17!

Youi need to add about 4 points for home court. :)

[SplitIdentity]

We all know how well the transitive property works in sports...

[Cydkar]

We don't play the style that would produce 100 points.

Comparing scores is fruitless but it's all we got right now. I expect ISU to win in a very close game because it's at Hilton.

[atlantacyclone]

We all know how well the transitive property works in sports...

In that case, we just beat OU in football! .... but were also beaten by about every team in the NCAA....

[06Panther]

Comparing scores is fruitless but it's all we got right now. I expect ISU to win in a very close game because it's at Hilton.

I don't necessarily disagree with you.


I don't know what ISU did in their game, but we roted 4-5 guys in at a time like it was hockey. So this game, being an exhibition, was not played like we would if it was a real game FWIW.

The defense for UNI looked really great all game long. The offense was pretty bad in the first half but picked up in the second half.

[CloneState1028]

I don't necessarily disagree with you.


I don't know what ISU did in their game, but we roted 4-5 guys in at a time like it was hockey. So this game, being an exhibition, was not played like we would if it was a real game FWIW.

The defense for UNI looked really great all game long. The offense was pretty bad in the first half but picked up in the second half.

They had to be exhausted by then (UNC-P). That's why your second half was so much better. 30-23 at half, right?

[chadm]

They had to be exhausted by then (UNC-P). That's why your second half was so much better. 30-23 at half, right?

They played Friday then Sunday.

ISU starting this Friday, plays Friday/Sunday/Tuesday

[Cydkar]

I don't necessarily disagree with you.


I don't know what ISU did in their game, but we roted 4-5 guys in at a time like it was hockey. So this game, being an exhibition, was not played like we would if it was a real game FWIW.

The defense for UNI looked really great all game long. The offense was pretty bad in the first half but picked up in the second half.

We played everybody on the team plenty of minutes but as for rotations I didn't pay enough attention. I can confidently say ISU didn't play this like a real game either. I thought you guys would blow them out since they played us less than a day prior but it really doesn't matter.

If UNI struggled then it might be an issue. ISU struggled against inferior teams in the very recent past. Not the case so far this year (early).

[CycloneErik]

They played Friday then Sunday.

ISU starting this Friday, plays Friday/Sunday/Tuesday

I think we have a little bit more depth, and quality depth, than UNC-Pembrooke.

I will award myself the Order of Captain Obvious badge for my little insight.