Deace & Miller, you don't get it OSU over Iowa.

**hawkadoodledoo** · 11-20-2009, 01:13 PM

Originally Posted by Cyrocks

Indiana BETTER than Colorado?

Okie State without ISU turning the ball over 6 times is is worse than Iowa winning by just six more points?

And I would say Michigan = Baylor and Michigan State = Texas A&M

Iowa beating Indiana by 18 is better than Okie St beating Colorado by 3.

I like these cool faces too. I also love woulda, coulda, shoulda too. Iowa without turning the ball over 3 times against OSU wins. They also win, if they don't turn it over against NU 4 times. So really we should be undefeated. You see how dumb that sounds now? Michigan = Baylor without their QB? With Robert Griffin, maybe. Mich St. = A&M? Seriously? You're reaching now.

**hawkadoodledoo** · 11-20-2009, 01:16 PM

Originally Posted by Cyrocks

Texas vastley >>>>> Ohio State

Ohio State LOST to Purdue. Texas undefeated.

Losing to Texas at home by 27 is a better loss than losing by 3 in OT to OSU, at the shoe? That's all I'm asking you to answer.

**isufbcurt** · 11-20-2009, 01:17 PM

Originally Posted by hawkadoodledoo

Iowa beating Indiana by 18 is better than Okie St beating Colorado by 3.

I like these cool faces too. I also love woulda, coulda, shoulda too. Iowa without turning the ball over 3 times against OSU wins. They also win, if they don't turn it over against NU 4 times. So really we should be undefeated. You see how dumb that sounds now? Michigan = Baylor without their QB? With Robert Griffin, maybe. Mich St. = A&M? Seriously? You're reaching now.

Michigan St has proven since the Iowa game that they are not that good.

**hawkadoodledoo** · 11-20-2009, 01:22 PM

Originally Posted by isufbcurt

Michigan St has proven since the Iowa game that they are not that good.

And A&M losing to Colorado, Oklahoma by 55!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, and KSU by 48 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hasn't?

**TedKumsher** · 11-20-2009, 01:23 PM

Originally Posted by Clark

These stats are a bit misleading aren't they? They include the automatic picks the Big 12 receives. As far as I can tell there has only been one time a Big 12 team has been picked as an at-large team and that was Texas last year.

If I am reading this site correctly:

Bowl Championship Series - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

then the Big 12 has had 2 BCS teams in '02 (Colorado), '04 (KSU), '05 (Texas), '08 (Kansas), '09 (Texas). And I *think* that the only way to have 2 BCS teams is to get an at-large bid.

**Cyrocks** · 11-20-2009, 01:28 PM

Originally Posted by hawkadoodledoo

Losing to Texas at home by 27 is a better loss than losing by 3 in OT to OSU, at the shoe? That's all I'm asking you to answer.

I thought I did answer you.

Ohio State is not very good. They lost to a team with a LOSING record. Texas will be playing for a national title.

**dhow** · 11-20-2009, 02:04 PM

Originally Posted by Cyrocks

Hmmm, no Oklahoma State won.

Had Colorado won, then, yeah!

That's why you can't play the who played who comparing like opponents game, since OSU killed ISU, but yet Colorado played better against OSU than ISU.

People can imagine what they think would happen if two teams were to play, but without playing, it's just pointless.

**clonin** · 11-20-2009, 02:10 PM

Ben Bruns has weighed in via Twitter...

"Big Ten - forget two BCS bids, you aren't good enough."

**WalkingCY** · 11-20-2009, 02:13 PM

Big 11 BLOWS.

Iowa Blows. GO GOPHERS!

**hawkadoodledoo** · 11-20-2009, 02:20 PM

Originally Posted by Cyrocks

I thought I did answer you.

Ohio State is not very good. They lost to a team with a LOSING record. Texas will be playing for a national title.

Yeah, I get Texas is better, no arguing that. I'm just arguing that losing to OSU on the road in OT is a better loss than getting blown out by Texas at home by 27. It's all in fun and won't matter if 1 or both teams choke before the year is over. Good day.

**wonkadog** · 11-20-2009, 03:19 PM

Originally Posted by chuckd4735

Not all of us are avid Hawkeye haters...

Well go live east of Grinnell for about 5 years and come back and report to us how you feel at that time. Isn't there some sort of pledge people have to sign to register on this site?

**Prone2Clone** · 11-20-2009, 04:15 PM

Originally Posted by chuckd4735

...they are an injured QB away from possibly being undefeated.

And about a dozen lucky breaks pulled out of Herky's ear away from being 4-7.

**chuckd4735** · 11-20-2009, 04:34 PM

Originally Posted by Cyrocks

I don't entirely disagree with you.

However, Oklahoma State did win at Georgia in the season opener while Iowa was struggling at home against UNI.

Georgia's other losses were to No. 1 Flordia, No. 4 LSU and at Tennessee.

They did win at Arkansas, beat Arizona State and beat South Carolina.

So I say Georgia was a pretty decent win.

The Georgia game was in Stillwater...

**iowaboy** · 11-20-2009, 04:52 PM

Iowa would physically out muscle Okie St. all day long. Iowa would rush 4 and drop 7. Forget the passing game. Would Ohio State beat Okie State? Yes! Too many athletes even though Tressel does less with more.

**SC Cy** · 11-20-2009, 05:04 PM

Originally Posted by iowaboy

Iowa would physically out muscle Okie St. all day long. Iowa would rush 4 and drop 7. Forget the passing game. Would Ohio State beat Okie State? Yes! Too many athletes even though Tressel does less with more.

Wow. Apparently last night's game is the only OSU game you saw all year. I know what's coming, you've seen them play a handful of times this year...blah blah blah. OSU's defense is the biggest ISU played all season and would physically manhandle Iowa. And no, Iowa could not stop OSU with Robinson out there. 34-10 wouldn't be a stretch for this game.