Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: USC and Floyd

  1. #16
    Legend
    Points: 229,966, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Cydkar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    12,864
    Points
    229,966
    Level
    100

    Re: USC and Floyd

    Quote Originally Posted by MontyBurns View Post
    What about a certain Iowa State football coach who left for a more high profile job and nearly a 100% pay increase? Where is your "Good for Gene" post???
    Gene leaving was a no-brainer. It's the way he left that makes him a dickweed.
    "Missouri is free to create an enduring basketball rivalry with Auburn."

  2. #17
    Speechless
    Points: 296,198, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUFan22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Grimes, IA
    Posts
    29,473
    Points
    296,198
    Level
    100

    Re: USC and Floyd

    Quote Originally Posted by MontyBurns View Post
    What about a certain Iowa State football coach who left for a more high profile job and nearly a 100% pay increase? Where is your "Good for Gene" post???
    The schizophrenic Hawk strikes again!

    Yup, same exact situations. I mean, Gene performed just as well as Floyd did here...


  3. #18
    Hall-Of-Famer Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,794

    Re: USC and Floyd

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclonenum1 View Post
    The big difference between the two that you seem to be missing is that Floyd actually produced some good results at ISU for ISU...Chizik not so much.

    I think most of us realized that Chizik saw ISU as a stepping stone (which I personally have no problem with) but we just expected that he would need to produce good results at ISU for ISU before he would be given the opportunity to move on.
    I'm not missing the difference at all. If Gene was using us as a steppingstone, he is going to go as soon as he gets the chance. Nowhere is it written that he has to win a certain number of games before he gets the opportunity to move on.

    And you can't blame Gene for taking the job, after all, it's not his fault that Auburn made the mistake of offering it to him. What did you expect Gene to do, tell Auburn "thanks for the offer of a bigger job and 100% raise, but I don't deserve it until I win at least 4 games at ISU"?
    Gene Smith, 1993-2000. 7 years, 6 NCAA's, 1 bowl game. Revenue sports postseason participation 50%. Good.
    Bruce Vandevelde, 2000-20005. 5 years, 4 bowl games, 2 NCAA's, 2 NIT's. Postseason participation 80%. Better.
    Jamie Pollard, 2005-. 4 years. 1 bowl game, 0 NCAA's, 0 NIT's. Postseason participation: 13%. The next big step.

    My ignore list: splitidentity, tarheelhawk,superdorf, clones_jer. That is all.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. Northern Iowa
  • August 31, 2013
  • 07:00 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19